User talk:TheFlapsGenius

SB19

One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is to present topics from a neutral point of view. This means articles must represent each outside view fairly and proportionally, but not present any single view as true. Your edits appear to violate this principle and introduce bias to the article. Please use the talk page to discuss controversial edits—if you do not, it is likely that your edits will simply be removed by others. You should also be aware that repeatedly inserting something breaks the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Ignoring this may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --Chiya^ko92 09:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is also an excemptoon on the rule which states that:

Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language (on the Offensive Language part is what the cause of that reversal of article) official_frar (talk) 11:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Paul Soriano does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I am not sure why you deleted my addition, which was intended to provide context that I had removed earlier when removing promotional content. An edit summary would have been helpful. Reverting a user's contributions without giving a summary can be considered offensive, (I'm not offended though, don't worry) as it can be taken to mean that the edit was no better than vandalism. The default 'undo' summary isn't sufficient when reverting an edit besides clear vandalism. Mako001 (C) (T) 08:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Camarin High School, Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camarin High School, Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]