User talk:TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Destroy all Diaphragms

A tag has been placed on Destroy all Diaphragms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U r verry angry go and have a cup of tea 15:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Eating, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Ok sorry, TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:GiantSnowman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 21:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:GiantSnowman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 28bytes (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked 2 weeks for harassment and sock puppetry. –MuZemike 23:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This and this were enough to block you alone on, but what were you going to do with this sock puppet, Iamjustyourimagination (talk · contribs)? Anyways, you can think about that for 2 weeks. Any further disruption will lead to an indefinite block. Regards, –MuZemike 23:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The diaphragm can has its password forgot, yes? Then the diaphragm has a remember again. The dipahragm will be goose now. GOOSE GOOSE GOOSE, goose say SORRY —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.135.191 (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Diaphragm wants to be fixing the wiki fix fix fix,, let the diaphragm fix commas plz. i can has unblokz plz plz plz? Diaphragm is be gud thank you very

Decline reason:

Not a valid unblock request. Your block has been extended to indefinite for your disruption. Step hen 22:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Been more than two weeks, pleaze let me out?? TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your account has been used for nothing but disruption, and your unblock requests have done nothing to indicate that will change. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I do indicate when can't edit? I have to sign learned you observe TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 12:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC) {{helpme}} Diaphragm would want to be fixing article page: "Sky Service (Kazakhstan)": TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can't, sorry. You're blocked.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 12:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have unblock please {{helpme}}?? I want to eddit page good, let give to the diaphragm a chance? xxx TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 17:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC) Please??? I promise no more bad vandalism TheAmazingExplodingDiaphragm (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC) Let you me out of "teh blokz" ... I wanting to edit page to add "reception" section onto page[reply]