User talk:TheActuary

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) - - Here are a few links you might find helpful: - - *Be Bold! - *Don't let grumpy users scare you off. - *Meet other new users - *Learn from others - *Play nicely with others - *Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! - *Tell us about you - - You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. - - If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. - - We're so glad you're here! Stifle (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC) - - ==Three-Revert rule== - Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Peer review for Actuary article

Hi there. Now that Actuary has been considered one of Wikipedia's good articles, I would like to see it develop or improve, if and as necessary, to become a candidate for featured article status. Therefore, and advice, suggestions, or statements that you think it is ready for featured article candidacy would be appreciated on the peer review page here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Actuary/archive1. Thank you. -- Avi 19:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Actuary: featured article candidate

Hello, TA. As you share an interest in actuaries with me, I would request you leave a comment (support, oppose, or neutral) on the article's featured article candidacy page here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Actuary. Thank you. -- Avi 22:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Looking for name suggestions for an article on life table methods

I have content on a non-life table use of life table methods (actually on a method to calculate birth control failure rates) that I would like to put in an article somewhere. I initially added this to the life table article, however I was corrected and learned that life table methods are not the same things as life tables. The other editors on the life table page, however, were unable to help me find an appropriate article (or article title) in which to place my information.

I'm posting on your page because you are listed as an actuary. Article titles that have been suggested so far are life table methods, life contingencies, and decrement table. My knowledge of these methods and their use is too sketchy to make an appropriate decision on article title, so I'm hoping you can give me some insight. Lyrl ^Talk _Contribs 01:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Deletion review

You voted Keep at the article's AfD. You may wish to make your voice heard at its deletion review. Thank you. -- Avi 21:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Jerry Newton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerry Newton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Newton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)