User talk:Thatperson

Welcome

Hello, Thatperson, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bloxham

Do you have a source for the claim that Bloxham's church spire is the highest in Oxfordshire? It isn't mentioned on the Bloxham Website, and I haven't been able to find any other confirmation. (It isn't that I don't believe you – it sounds reasoable enough – but we have a policy on giving citations.) --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 12:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — that's great; I've added the link to the article and as a citation (though, as the article only says "reputedly", I've added a qualifier). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broughton Castle

Do you mean the Loughrigg page if yes I copied it from the wikipedia loughrigg fell page thats ok isnt it! I did Proton > Banbury Ha

I did > 4 > midlands today > south today > Oxfordshire > Banbury.

I did it in 5 > Cumbria > counties > Cerimonial counties > Oxfordshire > Banbury.

so can I get rid of your welcome and bloxham talk sections or not? and have you seen Loughrigg ? what do you think? I wanted to put on my personal photos I took of it but I Can't

ok I have to go now I will see you some other time I will be on tommorow about the same time see you then.

hello thatperson its me again if your on do you want a game of banbury race this time start at doctor who, p.s you should get a labour supporter babel thing. and did you know that blackbird leys is strongly labour and always has been shows the labour type !

helpful tip

hi, I notice you on the new article patrol (you beat me to Mr George Guyatt). I notice that you wrote {{db| An article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject}}. While that is 100% correct a the tag {{db-bio}} will have the same effect. If you want to know about more shortcut for speedy deletes see the list on the sidebar of the page Wikipedia:Speedy deletions. Jon513 20:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the correct way to deal with vandalism is first to leave an appropiate message on his user page see Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace for the full list. Generally he will be blocked with you having to do anything. In this case I have already reported him to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Jon513 20:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i am and what has someone put on the bottom here above this ? also ive seen your bretch hill stuff

Think of something we do about idealy a new article but a stub will do can you think of one?

do you mean kraft foods banbury or just kraft foods? p.s are you going to delete any of this junk people have written on your page or not ??

Substing talk templates

Hi, Thatperson. Just a note that it's recommended when leaving warining templates on editor's talk pages to Subst them ( so that {{test}} is added as {{subst:test}} ). Happy patrolling and editing - Peripitus (Talk) 12:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bretch Hill

Hi Thatperson, your suggestion of merging the Bretch Hill and Neithrop pages might be a good idea. I included Orchard Fields based on the fact that I grew up on the Bretch Hill estate and went to that school myself (when it was still called the Neithrop) and knew lots of other children from the estate who went there too (though admittedly this was before William Morris existed). Perhaps the main article should be Neithrop and Bretch Hill should be a subsection within it.MFlet1 12:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE Bretch Hill/Neithrop boundary: I'm not sure there's any official boundary but I tend to think of Hastings Road, Prescott Avenue and Edmunds Road as all being part of the Bretch Hill estate as they were built at the same time, and The Fairway, Withycombe Drive etc as being part of Neithrop.MFlet1 17:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, in answer to your question, I don't really know anything about the other estates as I've hardly ever visited them! MFlet1 21:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

Hi Fellow-WikiPedian, This thing came up: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where Troy Once Stood. Would you like to vote? Antiphus 20:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Following on from our atoms discussion I have just found sources which suggest that a single diseased bacterium can contain up to 5 billion atoms

Warnings

You failed to sign your warning (which was wholly justified) to User:M at the W02. It is really important that these flags should be immediately identifiable.--Anthony.bradbury 21:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 195.93.21.8 lifted.

Request handled by: _JD^talk 20:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		I, user:Noface1, I award you The Minor Barnstar for your minor edits, most of which go overlooked. Congratulations, and keep up the great work! User:Noface1[[User:Noface1\|e</font\|}13th Nov 2006. 8:57 (UTC).

banbury related articles

hi saga city two things, firstly, was it necessary to change the articles to say for example hardwick, banbury to hardwick, oxfordshire? i ask because i know you stated banbury was not a county but it might make people think hardwick is a seperate settlement withen oxfordshire, southampton has a similar arrangement of articles on estates and they have southampton as an extension for all articles. You also stated that a couple of them were unique, well someone from another town may add another grimsbury from there town, i think it would be best to insure ourselfs from that sort of thing esspecially as they are not major articles, ill wait for your response before any major edits. Thanks Thatperson 16:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

There are well-established naming conventions for placenames throughout the world. They allow redlinks to be created with a fair degree of certainty that the article will link to them if/when it's created. This was the case with some of the Banbury articles (see, for each, "What links here"). The standard for the UK is placename alone, if not unique then it's placename followed by ceremonial county. If there are two places in a ceremonial county then it's placename followed by district. The problem that your renaming exercise caused was that all the Banbury articles formed a little self-referential pool within Wikipedia but - as the 'Banbury' affix is not standard - they were invisible to other article thus causing unecessary redlinks. The problem with that is that someone else will start an article with the 'approved' name, which in the long run leads to further problems. Can I suggest you look at "What links here" for each of the articles in question and you will see that many pick up pointers from elsewhere in Wikipedia. It is this connectivity that make Wikipedia the useful tool that it is and why following established naming conventions for places and people enhances this. I understand why you named them as you did (another editor insists on affixing the non-standard 'Huddersfield' to places there) but I hope you will understand why I brought them into mainstream Wikipedia practice. Best Wishes Saga City 21:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock please

{{unblock-auto|1=195.93.21.106|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mike mendoza". The reason given for Mike mendoza's block is: "inappropriate username (well-known person) - if this is your real name, please [[Special:|3=Samuel Blanning}}

Autoblock?

{{unblock-auto|1=195.93.21.106|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mike mendoza". The reason given for Mike mendoza's block is: "inappropriate username (well-known person) - if this is your real name, please [[Special:|3=Samuel Blanning}}

Er, that looks a bit dead... Are you autoblocked? _JD^talk 17:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked one autoblock ID thingy... Looked like the only one there, so I think you might be alright. _JD^talk 17:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How men were made to join WW1

Hi there. I have no argument with your assessment of this article, but you are not using the {{db}} template in quite the right way. There are a list of specific reasons accepted in wiki as reasons for speedy deletion; they can be found at WP:SPEEDY. Hope this helps.--Anthony.bradbury 11:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, & help

Thanks for fixing my talk page. This person is trying to start an edit war over at Bohemianism. Any assistance you can render would be appreciated. Charles T. Betz 04:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: southampton suburbs map

Hi, thanks for your message. The map I created was based loosely on a Google maps image too; I'm more than happy for you to change it to a better image if you have one. Something to note though is that there are a whole series of these images that I've uploaded; one with no suburbs highlighted, and then one for each suburb with the relevant suburb highlighted. If you have the time and inclination, it would be great if we could keep them all looking consistent. But I'm not precious about the images at all, so do feel free to go ahead and be bold. Cheers, Waggers 11:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedcubing

I put that up there because I doubt those articles will be enough on their own for the foreseeable future, but they'd greatly improve the speedcubing article as well as incubate there. I put the tag up rather than just doing it though because discussion like this is necessary and healthy towards keeping harmony on here and improving the encyclopedia as a whole. We can agree to disagree and take no action, but I hope we can find a compromise. I don't feel very strongly about the speedcubing merge, i'm just sharing my opinion. Just H 17:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your Excellent and persistent efforts to preventing and reverting vandalism in all it's forms. Congratulations Noface1 11:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noface1 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas!

In Him was life, and that life was the Light of men. John 1:4 KJV

Dear Thatperson,
Love came to a stable on that very special night to bring us out of darkness into His glorious light. May Jesus touch your life with gladness and warm your heart with love as we celebrate His birth. I hope you have a Blessed Christmas, User:Noface1 06:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you kindly for reverting the vandalism on my user page. -- Scjessey 13:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/Thatperson, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 08:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Thanks for the nice message! Hopefully see you around more. Let me know if you need anything or whatnot. Peace, delldot | talk 20:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting that user page vandalism. --Scimitar 16:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT

Hi there,

As a user looking to Adopt with the Adopt-a-User program, there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention, as well as request help with the backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

You should know that the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking. Once adoption is complete please use the templates found here on the Adoptee's and your user page.

Also numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

Furthermore a new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you have and if you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.

So I hope you get adopting soon - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 15:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion

the articles Speedcubing in the united states and speedcubing in the united kingdom have both been deleted. 18:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I put them both up for the five day deletion. Do you think if i tagged my user page for speedy deletion it would be deleted? because i want it to be deleted and i will copy and paste the code back on so it wont say i have 210 edits to it.

Midlands + stuff

[1] lol ! view the 2nd line it has a 2006 estimate for the population, why cant Banbury have this !? also view this - [2] go down to the - Leicester firsts - section and read it svery interesting especially - First roundabout in the UK - was built there ! intriguing maybe we could something like this for banbury. any thoughts ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noface1 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re: Speedcubing infobox

Hi! Thanks for your message. As I had mentioned on the article's Talk page, there were a couple of reasons why I removed the infobox. One of the main reasons was that I didn't feel it really added very much to the article -- given that the articles for other sports don't have infoboxes (for example, baseball, basketball, and hockey all lead in without an infobox), and the types of things that were included in the box you put in, it seemed a bit disorganized, distracting, and detracting from the overall streamlined look we're aiming for in the article. In addition, some of the facts were inaccurate, or felt like they weren't suitable for the lead image, and one of the first things that a reader would look at.

Please don't get me wrong -- I really appreciated the work you put into it, and the initiative that you took with it. I just felt that the article worked better without it. Please feel free to discuss it further with me, though, or take the discussion back to the article's Talk page. I hope my response was helpful! --Twilightsojourn 16:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's quite handy! Well, I competed in the 2003 World Championships, but I don't think the WCA had been formed at that point, so I'm guessing that technically, I haven't. :-( I'd like to go to the World Championships later this year, though, so I guess if I make it, I'll be able to use your userbox. :-) Thanks! --Twilightsojourn 16:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Category for Discussion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies . This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page.
VegaDark 22:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edouard Chambon

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. JuJube 20:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WCA logo.jpg

Hello Thatperson, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:WCA logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Thatperson. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not Vandalise Wikipedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page user:geniussansom on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Browning Road Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Browning Road Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Browning Road Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ironstones Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ironstones Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ironstones Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Princess Diana Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Princess Diana Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Princess Diana Park, Banbury.

Rugrats Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rugrats Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rugrats Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yellow Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Yellow Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spiceball Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spiceball Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Spiceball Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

Try to use some references for the article Honiton. Review WP:V and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orchard Fields Community School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Orchard Fields Community School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dashwood School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dashwood School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hanwell Fields Community School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hanwell Fields Community School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hill View School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hill View School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St Leonard's School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St Leonard's School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Morris School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William Morris School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hardwick, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hardwick, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruscote

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ruscote, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poet's Corner, Oxfordshire

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Poet's Corner, Oxfordshire, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wildmere Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wildmere Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tramway Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tramway Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swan Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Swan Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southam Road Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Southam Road Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Overthorpe Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Overthorpe Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beaumont Industrial Estate, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beaumont Industrial Estate, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Banbury Cross Retail Park

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Banbury Cross Retail Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Foscote Private Hospital

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Foscote Private Hospital, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Calthorpe, Oxfordshire

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Calthorpe, Oxfordshire, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Banbury Miscellaneous

A tag has been placed on Template:Banbury Miscellaneous, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Everything on this template is allready included in the miscellaneous of Template:Banbury Wards

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Banbury Miscellaneous|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another country outline moved to article space!

Topic outline of Zimbabwe is now in article space. It still needs images and some bluelinking, and is undoubtedly missing some relevant links.

Please take a look at it. You will no doubt spot things you can easily fix that I overlooked.

The Transhumanist 19:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Banbury

Hi TP. Your map of Banbury is good but it would be even better if you could list all of the areas shown on the map in the Banbury article. I guess a full list would look something like this (based on memory, as I haven't lived there for nearly 20 years!):

1) Hardwick

2) Ruscote

3) Neithrop

4) Bretch Hill

5) Poets Corner

6) Area between Broughton Rd and Bloxham Rd (not sure what you call this)

7) Easington

8) Calthorpe

9) Cherwell Heights

10) er...there isn't a 10

11) Grimsbury

12) Town centre

A-D) As shown

E-H) Not sure - never ventured to those parts very often! MFlet1 (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Banbury Estates.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Banbury Estates.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Banbury Estates.PNG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sharveet (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Thatperson! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

First ever Oxford Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Banburyshire

Template:Banburyshire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Charles (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estates of Banbury

Category:Estates of Banbury, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Thatperson,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]