User talk:That Coptic Guy/Archives/2022/October
This is an archive of past discussions with User:That Coptic Guy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
NPP Backlog drive
I have removed you from the participants list because you don’t have the new page patroller right. Thanks, Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 11:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Forgot I even put myself on that list. Thanks. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Thank you for the barnstar! Though, honestly, I'd say you're just as good at vandal-fighting as I am... Thegreatluigi (talk) 17:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
- Hahaha, thanks Thegreatluigi - Cheers :) — That Coptic Guy (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
- @That Coptic Guy thank you. Aabid Zayn (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Aabid Zayn No problem. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing :) — That Coptic Guy (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Bold
Regarding this message [1]. There is agreement that this type of content should be removed, please see Talk:Abortion_in_Vermont#Women's_abortion_experiences where the exact same content was discussed. 2A01:4B00:9D42:6E00:FCE7:AC6D:CFC5:3126 (talk) 19:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @2A01:4B00:9D42:6E00:FCE7:AC6D:CFC5:3126: That discussion is at it pertains to THAT specific article, not the same types of articles for every state in the US. You've also added your own edits to articles unrelated to abortion as well, and respectfully, I am asking you to stop and am inviting you to discuss this on each respective article's talk page. That is what Wikipedia is about--not one person making a decision, but making it a collective decision. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Right, I will start sections on 30 articles then. I am not sure how
You've also added your own edits to articles unrelated to abortion as well,
is remotely related to the Abortion stuff: In misplaced warning message, you refer to an Abortion article, not anything else. Please point out the policy that states that I should have sought consensus for my non-Abortion-related edits before making them. I can start with one which gives me the right to: WP:BOLD. 2A01:4B00:9D42:6E00:FCE7:AC6D:CFC5:3126 (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Right, I will start sections on 30 articles then. I am not sure how
Thanks
For the reversions on all the state articles ref abortion. I noticed them before you started reverting and pointed it out to an admin but I've cancelled it. Knitsey (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Knitsey Thanks :) Appreciate your hard work on this as well. The clean-up on this one is going to be a bit arduous. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- And to user:Andrevan for the reverts. Knitsey (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- sure thing Andre🚐 19:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- And to user:Andrevan for the reverts. Knitsey (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
"Golden liquid" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Golden liquid and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Golden liquid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)