User talk:Thane Eichenauer
Welcome!
Hello, Thane Eichenauer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
-Poli (talk • contribs) 07:53, 2005 July 27 (UTC)
Removal of POV tags
[edit]You're doing a grand job! Matt Stan 15:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Liberty Dollar
[edit]I've nominated the page "Liberty Dollar" for nomination and am notifying you accordingly since you are a contributor. BrianGCrawfordMA 23:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
G. Edward Griffin
[edit]I think that the article on G. Edward Griffin may violate copyright law as it is lifted almost word for word from the biography on the book jacket of The Creature From Jekyll Island. If this is the case most of the information should be reworded so that it does not need to be removed. As you are a major contributor to the article, I would like to hear your thoughts before I do anything. -FurciferRNB
Adoption
[edit]Hey! I saw that you offered to adopt me and teach me about wikipedia. Thank you! Where do I go from here? --Alizera 02:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Ask me questions via one of two methods #1: simply add your question or questions to my user talk page (likely the easier and best option) or #2: Goto my my user page and click on "E-mail this user" link in the left sidebar (in the box labelled 'toolbox') or go there via a link (either of which will only be an option if you have confirmed your email address via the 'email box' under 'my preferences').
Alrighty. How exactly do you start your own article from scratch instead of editting something that's already there. Also, how do these template thingies work?--Alizera
What would you suggest would be the easiest way for newbies to contribute? Like what specific tasks do you think would be easiest? --Alizera Do you ever just edit an article without knowing what the article is about? Maybe clear up grammar and such?--Alizera 23:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Why sure, so long as the article is written in comprehensible English. Thane Eichenauer 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Adoption offers
[edit]Offered to Yeyosmoka21. Thane Eichenauer 21:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey!, i got the adoption userbox! thank you so much for the request, i was starting to doubt if anyone would! well anyways i accept =]
Help!
[edit]well i started the new article Virtual Villagers 2: The Lost Children and i was wondering if you could take a look and see if i still need anything and help me with anything theres left to do. thanks
Adopt-a-user
[edit]Hi there,
I have a query regarding your experience to be an adopter as your edit count is very low. Please see the guideline criteria here Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adopter's Area. Either reply here or on my user talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 12:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay you acknowledge you have a low edit count. Generally a user with such a low edit count would not be an appropriate adopter because they did not have the experience needed to help answer the questions of their adoptees. Now sometimes users have a large amount of experience elsewhere of Wikipedia, from other Wikis, anon editing or other accounts. My question is whether you have such experience, and are confident that you will be able to help your adoptees. Cheers Lethaniol 22:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:BarryHessGrayBackgroundSmall.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Speedy deletion of Thane Eichenauer
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Thane Eichenauer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Largo Plazo (talk) 06:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Before you write an article about yourself, I suggest you read WP:Notability (people), WP:Autobiography (in particular, the section at WP:YOURSELF), and WP:RESUME for pertinent Wikipedia policies pertaining to articles of that nature.
Speedy deletion of Brent Maupin
[edit]A tag has been placed on Brent Maupin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Largo Plazo (talk) 06:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Thane Eichenauer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ThoughtAudio Review Request
[edit]I am seeking independent and neutral viewpoints on the article ThoughtAudio, which is being considered for deletion. If you have a few minutes to review it, I would appreciate your opinion on the decision to retain and improve, or to delete it. I fear that ThoughtAudio may have been targeted by the same editor that made a failed attempt to delete the wikiquote article Michael Scott Gallegos on the grounds "Not sufficiently notable." The majority of my work has been as the wikiquote editor ELApro. I have been a long time editor for Wikipedia, but have not created many articles here. I would much appreciate your advice and/or contributions with regard to this decision. ELApro (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Thane Eichenauer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Thane Eichenauer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)