User talk:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala

December 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shevdivadar; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Know How To Revert The Page

I Don't Know How To Revert The Page Loke You. somebody editing wrong information In shevdivadar page Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

I have reverted additions that you made to two Wikipedia articles today. Unfortunately, both your additions were written in poor English and had poor grammar and sentence structure which would make it very hard for a reader to follow and understand the material you have added. While I do not wish to discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia, I think you will need to improve your written English if you wish to make major additions or changes to English Wikipedia articles. Thanks. --Chewings72 (talk) 11:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nittawinoda (talk) 12:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caste affiliation

Please read the information at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists before adding any more names to lists. It is not sufficient for a source to say that a living person is a Koli - the source has to show that the person themselves says it, ie: they self-identify.

Also, I think there may be an issue regarding the workd Koli itself, which may refer to Koli people or Kori caste, which are apparently different things. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also a koli and kori. We are one , peoples call us koli and kori

Can't take your word for it, I'm afraid. Have you looked at the Kori caste article? That seems to say that they are different things, even though Kori are sometimes called Koli. - Sitush (talk) 13:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kheda have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying

Please stop copying stuff to Wikipedia from this blog. - Sitush (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Think again?

I think you should reconsider your interests here. Aside from the issues above, which impact on many of your edits, I and other people have also had to revert you because of very poor phrasing, use of inappropriate sources and a very obvious attempt to "promote" Koli people regardless of whether their alleged Koli status even mattered. Not every edit of yours has been poor - there are at least four or five that were ok, where you limited yourself to linking something (Koli people, usually, as it happens).

Please read the information below. If you continue to contribute in this tricky area of caste articles, and in particular if you maintain close to one particular topic within it, such as Koli stuff, then you are going to have to up your game, which probably involves taking things much slower, asking about things before doing them, and spending more time familiarising yourself with how things work here. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

And you have just done it again here. That is an edit of yours that I reverted previously only a few hours ago and will now have to revert again. The fact, if indeed it is a fact, that one admiral was a Koli is not significant to our article, and using a newspaper interview to support an alleged factual statement about something that happened centuries ago is not good practice - if it is significant then academic sources will have covered it. In addition, the source doesn't even say what our sentence now says following your change: the source says that one admiral was a Koli but the sentence implies that a multitude of Koli people were in charge, which tends to suggest that many of the ships were captained by them etc. I'm pinging Bishonen because this is getting silly - it took me a couple of hours to fix all of your edits since December and I'm not particularly keen on the idea of this being an ongoing situation. We all make mistakes but when someone consistently makes similar mistakes then that is a problem. - Sitush (talk) 06:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is another. We do not use Raj era sources for statements about caste/tribe affiliations etc. I know that you did not add those sources and that they do not say what the article said before your arrival, but nor do they say Chauhan, which you have left in there or Kshatriya, which you added. As I am sure you are aware, Chauhans are not Kolis, and while our article for Thakor has recently said that Thakors are Kshatriya (you edited it that way), that also is not sourced properly, it is inappropriate to assume that the same applies at some other article, and it is in fact a logical implausibility because Koli people are tribal and Kshatriya is a Hindu caste/varna concept - tribal people are not part of the Hindu caste system and so claiming such a title is pretty much rewriting history to suit some sort of personal glorification agenda. What you should have done, I think, is remove the Raj sources and all mentions of caste that are reliant on them, replacing with {{cn}}. I will do that now. - Sitush (talk) 06:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit here is wrong because the source does not say it was named after him, although it does mention him and the place. - Sitush (talk) 06:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving Wikipedia right now. You discouraged me. I'm not providing wrong information but you removed my all information. Good Bye Sitush Bitush Kitush

Whether the information is right or wrong is not the point. You have to comply with our policies and guidelines and cannot just write what you think to be correct - see, particularly, the information at WP:V. You don't have to leave, merely amend your approach. - Sitush (talk) 07:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see there are problems with the user's contributions. Even though I do believe they contribute in good faith, it's not acceptable to have a situation where a highly competent editor like Sitush has to spend hours fixing their edits, and where I can't see any learning curve. Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala, if you are indeed leaving Wikipedia (and note that you don't have to do that, as Sitush says), I won't bother you with any sanctions right now. But if you continue editing, it seems likely that I will have to limit the kinds of contributions you're allowed to make, by banning you from caste-related topics. Bishonen | talk 12:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

They are still doing it, Bishonen - see this, which has the added anomaly regarding the use of kshatriya as I mentioned to them up above ^^ . - Sitush (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And what the heck is the "Disbanding" section of this? I suspect that, as with many other of their larger edits, it is all a copy/paste from somewhere and it has got mangled. - Sitush (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, most of that article was copied from this, which is the same blog that this user has already be warned about copying from at multiple other articles. - Sitush (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been topic banned from caste-related pages

For persistent disruptive editing on caste pages and lack of understanding of explanations and warnings, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

You have been indefinitely banned from making any edits to pages related to caste or social groups.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 20:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Compare my warning above. I hope you understand this sanction, Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. It means that you are not allowed to edit any pages that have to do with caste or social groups. You are welcome to edit the rest of Wikipedia, but if you edit pages that have to do with caste or social groups, you will be blocked. Bishonen | talk 20:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala, you created Nana Farari a few hours ago, pushing your usual Koli POV. I fixed it, you were topic banned and now this has happened at that obscure, orphaned article. I do hope it was not you because Bishonen or any other patrolling admin will not be impressed. You cannot avoid your topic ban by editing while logged out, so if that is what you have done then please stop. - Sitush (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okkay brother He was not me

Why have you now created Rama Kirwa? He was involved with the Kolis, so it is an outright breach of your ban. The ban applies not just to articles about castes/tribes etc but to anything related to them or even mentioning them, as I thought Bishonen had made clear to you. - Sitush (talk) 12:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And yet again you have basically copied it, this time from here. It is mostly gibberish and the sources are mostly useless. I am tempted to ask for the thing to be deleted because I am fed up of trying to untangle this stuff. Not every freedom fighter or dacoit is notable, even if they were executed, and we need sources that show more than passing mentions of a person, which the ones in that article do not achieve. In fact, you have created a bunch of bad articles of a similar type this morning, copying from that blog, changing the odd word and then (mostly) adding books written by British Raj authors in the 19th century to "support" your statements, which often they do only in the flimsiest sense. I have asked for them all to be deleted. - Sitush (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, you have created a bunch of bad articles of a similar type this morning, copying from that blog, changing the odd word and then (mostly) adding books written by British Raj authors in the 19th century to "support" your statements, which often they do only in the flimsiest sense. I have asked for them all to be deleted. - Sitush (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okkay i will not tag Koli People page

It isn't about linking to the Koli people page. It is about writing about them or any other caste/tribe, whether you link or not. - Sitush (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okkay Sorry Brother I Will Never Will Do It Again. Plz Don't Delete My Articles. I Will Not Make More Article . Plz Bhaiji

Topic ban violations

You have created a whole bunch of articles that violate your topic ban. It's as if the ban encouraged you to make more caste-related edits than before! I don't know if you can't understand the warnings and bans you get, or are defying them, but it really doesn't make any difference. You have been blocked for two weeks. If you continue to edit in the area you have been banned from when you return from this block, you will be blocked indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 12:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Plzz don't delete my articles i will do nothing more.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. That code will be converted to a signature and timestamp when you save. I'm sorry, but I can't leave your articles up. They are not appropriate for Wikipedia for several reasons, which are explained by Sitush just above. Basically, you haven't used reliable sources. Also, the articles were created in violation of your topic ban. What is it you don't understand about your topic ban? I don't know how to explain it more clearly. Bishonen | talk 14:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Brother you can save my articles. Pls help me Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deccan Koli Corps moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deccan Koli Corps, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mansa Khant

The article Mansa Khant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. The sole source here is pretty much the only mention anywhere reliable, and it is a speculative and passing mention based itself on an unreliable old source. NB: article created by a member of a prolific Koli-centric sockfarm but prior to their initial detection.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 21:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nana Farari

The article Nana Farari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Article created by a member of a prolific Koli-centric sockfarm prior to their initial detection as such.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 21:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]