User talk:Tgambesc

Welcome!

Hello, Tgambesc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Darren-M (talk) 00:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Darren. I will be sure to review those links before I submit for a review. Tgambesc (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr. (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please examine this draft very carefully, when you will see that there are at least two articles here, perhaps more. If you are writing a biography please write that article, and do not digress into other topics in detail. They can be mentioned, of course they can

Looks at flowery language. Remove it. Example: "was a humble man who had strong devotion to family, God, and country" You are not writing his eulogy, you are writing his biography.

Treat him as though he were living. For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. I know he is deceased, but strive to hit that standard.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 16:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tgambesc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 16:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Writing a biography of a family member is hard. A small and well referenced article where others build it is likely tobe better than a weighty piece saying all that the family wishes to say. Please be pragmatic and restrained Fiddle Faddle 16:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Faddle I will definitely head over there after another round of revisions. Thanks--Tgambesc (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 20:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft may have been rejected

There is a route forward since it appears that your rejected draft will go nowhere

You may write and submit for review a substantially different draft. If you do so then please get it right before you even consider submitting it. WP:42 expresses in summary that which must be present.

Please deploy {{connected contributor}} on the talk page of any such draft that you create. It is essential that your WP:COI is stated on the talk page.

If you are writing the gentleman's biography do not stray into other topics.

Recognise that not everyone passes WP:N and that your task may be impossible. Learn when to cut your losses. Fiddle Faddle 23:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr. (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Genealogy in a self-published website is not an acceptable source. Stuff the subject wrote isn't allowable as sourcing. Places where the subject worked aren't truly independent of the subject. One source says that it "does not attempt to recapitulate all of the different published discussions... It is dedicated to presenting the view of Dr. Joseph M. Gambescia which needs to enter the stream of discussion about this important topic." which doesn't sound so objective to me. In all, no real case for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr.

Hello, Tgambesc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr.

Hello, Tgambesc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Marion Gambescia Sr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]