User talk:Teswaren

Teswaren, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Teswaren! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Peter Ewesor, from its old location at User:Teswaren/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Teswaren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Ewesor (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

*The tone of this submission needs to be adjusted before it can be considered further. There is no need for talking up by using words like prominent and exceptional. Just write it as it is and let the reader deduce this themselves.

Kindly adjust the excessive use of citations. 2-3 citations are enough to verify one fact. Also remove external links from the body of the text.
The infobox image is listed as the draft author's "own work" and the image is not available elsewhere online suggesting that the author of this draft may have a close connection with the subject of this draft. Kindly read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures. You may ask for further guidiance at the teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Ewesor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Ewesor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 14:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello Teswaren. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Peter Ewesor, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Teswaren. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Teswaren|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Reading Beans^{Talk to the Beans} 14:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Beans, Good to read through your review. Like I have explained previously, there is no COI, I am not a paid advocate neither I am expecting any form of compensation for writing or editing my article on Peter Ewesor. Just as there is always a first time, the draft article on Peter Ewesor happened to be my first article on Wikipedia, I have adjusted my writing style according to instructions from Princess of Ara. I sincerely appreciate the corrections so far and I am ready to learn more. Teswaren (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Teswaren except abysmal then how you write an article is subjectively inconsequential, what we are looking for is notability, if notability is satisfied then anyone can help adjust your article to meet our MOS, you may want to visit the WP:TEAHOUSE for other pair of eyes to access notability. Celestina007 (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007, thanks for your input. My decision to write the article in the first place was simply due to notability. A search on him can reveal. Thanks, Teswaren (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you are saying, that is why I advised you to go the WP:TEAHOUSE where editors with true knowledge of policy may assist you. Celestina007 (talk) 15:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Ewesor (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Ewesor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Ewesor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Ewesor

Hello, Teswaren. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Ewesor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]