Jump to content

User talk:Tennisuser123/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 6    Archive 7    Archive 8 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  ... (up to 100)


Navigating the Tennisuser123 Userspacee
User:Tennisuser123 User talk:Tennisuser123 Special:Contributions/Tennisuser123 Special:Prefixindex/User:Tennisuser123 User:Tennisuser123/Userboxes User:Tennisuser123/List of Sandboxes Special:CentralAuth
Talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:2007 Grand Prix Tennis de Lyon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:2007 Grand Prix Tennis de Lyon has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:2007 Grand Prix Tennis de Lyon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Madison Brengle

I have nominated Madison Brengle, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Brengle. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. bdodo1992 (talk) 23:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hradecká

Hello, Hradecká is on the right or left, if you know :) [1]? Thank you --Misbeliever (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the left ... I found out [2] ( she has the same watch and Wilson racquet :) --Misbeliever (talk) 04:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Francis Casey Alcantara

I have nominated Francis Casey Alcantara, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Casey Alcantara. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cow (Bull) About.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Template:Northwest Airlink Carriers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. HereFord 20:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RoundTemplate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sergei Aleksandrovich Zhukov, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Aleksandrovich Zhukov. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Durova318 20:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:3TeamRR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the "hangon" tag you put on this article - they are only used when an article has nominated for speedy deletion, and this is at Articles for deletion, a different process which usually lasts seven days. You can give your views at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STS-135. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tennisuser123! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 333 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Rafael Font de Mora - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Alla Kudryavtseva - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Anton Shkaplerov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Sergei Revin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Chase Buchanan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cruise Ship Companies

Template:Cruise Ship Companies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SIGNATURE TEST

–THANKS! Tennisuser123 (yak!!) 01:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bluecheck

Template:Bluecheck has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Acela First.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Acela First.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expedition 35

Spacefacts is not a reliable source. You will notice that expedition articles are not started until announced by NASA. I will ask you to blank the article and request its deletion or I will nominate it for deletion for the following reason. -MBK004 15:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

Hi Tennisuser123, I would like to invite you to a discussion on setting up good guidelines for tennis player notability. Please feel free to give comments and suggestions there. Thank you. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 09:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:S2407s1SeptaCar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:S2407s1SeptaCar.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:25071B.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:25071B.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 01:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:21267A.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:21267A.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 01:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:20138Amfleet.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:20138Amfleet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 02:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abrnjt5529.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abrnjt5529.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:82064Panel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:82064Panel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:HorizonAmfleetViewliner.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HorizonAmfleetViewliner.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]