User talk:TennisGrandSlam

Welcome!

Hello, TennisGrandSlam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- TennisAuthority 13:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Start Box Discussion!

I was just wanting to let you know there's a discussion going on about the validity of these new template, and was wanting to give you and opportunity to respond, which here is the link Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Start_Boxes_Templates_for_Tennis_Player.3F TennisAuthority 18:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go Here to see what I got a brewing with rivalry pages!

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Go_Here_to_make_rivalry_pages.21!TennisAuthority 09:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You Wanna help?

Hello Tennis Grand Slam, do you want to flow the procedure and create some of the rivalry pages!TennisAuthority 18:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TennisGrandSlam, I am working on a laundry list of the rivalries in tennis, and would love your help, which before you pursue on be sure to tag it before it is done because someone else might be doing it!TennisAuthority 19:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd love to help! I'll try and make pages for the relatively more obscure rivalries.TennisGrandSlam (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1st Paragraph of Roger Federer Article

Hi GrandSlam. Could you check the first paragraph of the Federer article and make sure the wording reflects what numerous experts have said? For some reason, certain wiki members are fiddling with the wording to try to whitewash the facts. I appreciate your contributions to the article. Thanks. TheTennisObserver (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)TheTennisObserver[reply]

Slam, I replied to your comment on my user page. Thanks, as ever. TheTennisObserver (talk) 02:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)TheTennisObserver[reply]

JHU article quality

Please do not change the article quality yourself. The article has not been assessed as a WP:GA and certainly it's a conflict-of-interest for a very involved editor to also be assessing the quality of an article. Madcoverboy (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Center

Sorry about that, I was in a rush that day and reverted the wrong thing. The "The" in "The University of Pittsburgh Center for Public Health Preparedness" was incorrect for the article title, which is why I reverted it. I was sloppy about it, sorry. I appreciate your new CPHP article. No offense meant. CrazyPaco (talk) 16:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JHU Press

The redirect from where the list was MUST be kept, because it's required by Wikipedia's copyright license. As for the others, you need to take them to WP:RFD (where I will probably oppose their removal).. Please see WP:CSD for the only circumstances where redirects can be speedy deleted. as for the edits themselves, see the JHU Press talk p. DGG (talk) 02:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! As a newcomer to Wikipedia I was unaware of these regulations. I had deemed the redirects redundant but I don't mind keeping them if policy dictates it so.TennisGrandSlam (talk) 03:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also started a discussion on whether the journal lists should be separate--there are multiple factors involved, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals. Incidentally, i have been looking at some of the other articles on JHU & did some editing on the School of Public Health one. You might do well to read our FAQ about organisations. I want to encourage you to use a plainer style, not repeat the name of the organization, not use adjectives about how good it is--when it's as excellent as the various parts of JHU, the accomplishments speak for themselves, & not include details about how to get to the buildings that would not be of encyclopedic interest. In the positive vein, I'd encourage you to get the university to license some first rate pictures--and to put then on Commons for general use by all the Wikipedias. And I'd certainly also encourage you to write articles about anyone connected with the University that does not have them, and is obviously entitled--like being a full professor at a major university, or being a member of the National Academies--we are lacking most of the members of the Institute of Medicine. DGG (talk) 04:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you David. I really appreciate your advice. Incidentally I did leave a reply to your comment on the JHU Press page. I have plans on meaningful expansions of the articles on the schools of medicine and public health but they will probably have to wait until I can spare some more time in that regard; I agree that some quality images are sorely needed, hopfully I will be able to remedy that soon.TennisGrandSlam (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing my reversions of a blocked sockpuppeteer

Hello TGS. I noticed you undid my reversion. That's cool, the only reason I'm reverting User:Chidel's edits is that he is a blocked sockpuppeteer and, as such, his edits are reverted on sight, regardless of merit. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Per your accepted request, I have added rollback rights to your account. Ensure you only use rollback correctly, ie its intended usage of reverting vandalism only. For information on rollback see: Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback in the future, just let me or any admin know. Cheers. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nja247!TennisGrandSlam (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jhup2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jhup2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 23:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BLUE JAY HEAD-left.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BLUE JAY HEAD-left.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanic and Latino American Politics

I am a new Wikipedian and just added to the page Hispanic and Latino American Politics. I would appreciate any comments, tips, and edits to make this page better. Thank you for your help! Thisonewins (talk) 03:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Your AIV report against User:Leroy e. brown has been declined. His edits are not vandalism--see WP:VANDAL. It looks to me like the two of you are having a dispute about which citations to use. Instead of edit warring, go to the article's talk page and discuss it. I note that neither of you have discussed it outside of edit summaries. If you don't stop, you might both be blocked for edit warring. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1st School of Public Health

Dear Leroy e. brown, if it means that much to you please feel free to cite Tulane as the 1st school of public despite the Hopkins article citing at least 7-8 independent references to counter your claim (prior to your removal of references) and substantiate JHSPH being the 1st. This "editing war of attrition" is not worth my time. Hope this offers you some comfort and solace. Be well!TennisGrandSlam (talk) 04:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not worth your time, then why have you gone to great lengths to change Tulane's website and revert the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg SPH page so many times? Why have you reported me as a vandal, if you are not interested in war? Clearly this is worth a great deal of your time! Anyway, know that your request for my being designated as such was denied, and that I have never removed any references. There are several people from all over the world who have written on this discussion page with regard to the false information you are so vehemently representing. And, yes, the facts do mean a great deal to me. I have been in this business since 1963, and I have no intention of quitting. People like you and Walter Wiggins must be subdued. Please govern yourself accordingly.

Leroy E. Brown (talk) 04:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find your reaction and comments rather amusing; you clearly have not read the references in the article which are a lot older than the reference you cite which state that Hopkins is the oldest school of public health. Clearly this is a matter near and dear to your heart to which you have attached so much of your own ego to, so like I said I will let you be, your aberrant "encyclopedia browned" resources and flawed "investigational" skills not withstanding -- my gift to you. :) Cheers! TennisGrandSlam (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you are back to devote more of your time to the topic! The truth is near and dear to my heart, yes. If it makes you feel better to consider the truth your gift, then I gladly accept it on behalf of all of the people who have objected to your tirade of puffery. Leroy E. Brown (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JHU Template

Your version of the JHU template from 2009 looks nice. A few too many blues, but still very nice to look at. Have you seen it lately? We need to do something about this. JamaUtil (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 06:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

Nomination of Johns Hopkins School of Nursing and other articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing (authorship)

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johns Hopkins University in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johns Hopkins University in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johns Hopkins University in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]