User talk:Teknologi Positif

March 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Russia–United States relations has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022. Why was I blocked for 3 months?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize. My "Technologi Positif" name doesn't make any annoying edits to this English Wikipedia. Why was I blocked for 3 months? Teknologi Positif (talk) 05:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC) I am sorry. My name "Teknologi Positif" made no disturbing edits to this English Wikipedia. Why was I blocked for 3 months? If maybe I have a certain error, maybe it's not me but using my address to be misused. Please. Please check my contribution if it's true I'm wrong or not. Thank you Teknologi Positif (talk) 05:09, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account isn't blocked. Without the error message that you get when you try to edit, there isn't anything we can do to help. SQL ^{Query Me!} 04:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To look into this, we need to know your IP address. If you don't want to post it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 05:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Advanced Indonesia Coalition, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 05:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop changes in fixing/refining edits again....! as you did at List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign primary endorsements, you may be blocked from editing. Hafizh Iskandar (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop changes in fixing/refining edits again....! as you did at List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign primary endorsements, you may be blocked from editing. Hafizh Iskandar (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Obama

Please stop changes in fixing/refining edits again!! as you did at List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign primary endorsements, Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. you may be blocked from editing. (talk) 01:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT ADD MALIK OBAMA AGAIN!!

Please do not add Malik Obama AGAIN!! as you did at List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign primary endorsements, Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. you may be blocked from editing. Hafizh Iskandar (talk) 03:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hi,

Please seek consensus before changing headshots, as you have in multiple articles (e.g. 2024 United States presidential election in West Virginia).

Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 116.206.14.18. I don't know why I was blocked by User:Malcolmxl5 . I don't use a VPN to edit Wikipedia. I also don't use anonymous proxies. Is the most likely cause another customer using my previously assigned IP address running an open proxy? Please unblock this account. Thank you and God bless you. Teknologi Positif (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is possible that a prior user of your IP address was using a proxy. You'll probably have to wait until you are assigned a new IP before you can edit. 331dot (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign endorsements, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammad Hosseini. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. Teknologi Positif (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi. Your user page appears to be a copy of List of presidents of the United States. This is inappropriate. Please either delete that content or move it elsewhere in your userspace properly identified with a {{userspace draft}} as described in WP:COPIES. Thanks. RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the problematic revisions. RoySmith (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting an RfC

Hi, regarding this edit from earlier today, this edit from two days ago, and this one from a week or so back. In each case, you copied the {{rfc}} tag, including all of its parameters and the prior matter, from another RfC. There is nothing at WP:RFCST, or the entire WP:RFC page, nor even at Template:Rfc, that says that you should do that. Indeed,Template:Rfc#Usage explicitly states do not choose your own value for the |rfcid= parameter, or re-use a value that is in use (or was previously used) on another RfC – instead, always let Legobot select a value.

The reason is that Legobot maintains an off-wiki table of every RfC that has ever existed, and it uses the rfcid of each one as a unique key value. If two RfCs share one rfcid, Legobot can only track one of them - and is liable to get them mixed up.

Please don't do it again. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I ever made a mistake. Teknologi Positif (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Talk:2024 United States presidential election

I made a comment on the talk page there regarding your original RfC, but I wanted to expand here. Right now there are four users who support your proposal. As a result, I don't believe that you can now withdraw it while their support comments are active as technically you are not considered to be the owner of the discussion, unlike on your talk page where you can archive or delete most discussions without comment under OWNTALK. On the thread of active comments, you haven't striken your own support comment above in that RfC. So for the closer, they are going to read your proposal, your extra support comment, and then your withdraw comment. I would recommend that you should strike the support comment so that others know not to consider it. Other than that, I would recommend participating only in the original RfC regarding the infobox photos. --Super Goku V (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. Teknologi Positif (talk) 04:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teknologi Positif. Thank you. Prcc27 (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why if someone who always thinks the same is accused of being a sock puppet. You can't just accuse without evidence. Could they always read Wikipedia and find my proposal? Why are people who think the same are accused of being sock puppets? Teknologi Positif (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do that to me? I'm shocked because I just proposed a photo about Trump and there are people who think the same but you accuse me of being a sock puppet. Teknologi Positif (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with anyone else. It's just that I'm confused when I submit a proposal for a new Trump photo and there are people who have the same opinion as me, I am accused of using a sock puppet. Maybe I shouldn't submit a proposal for a new Trump photo anymore. I know you are a Democrat, but I ask that you have good intentions towards me. I am actually an Independent and not affiliated with any party. That's why I submitted a proposal for a new Trump photo with a smiling face to be on par with Harris's photo which is also smiling. But if you want to silence my opinion and accuse me, I am willing and sincere. Teknologi Positif (talk) 13:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teknologi Positif. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize if I have lost everyone. I don't know why someone who always thinks the same is accused of being a sock puppet. You can't just accuse without any evidence. What if they always read Wikipedia and find my proposal? Why is someone who thinks the same is accused of being a sock puppet? Why did you do that to me? I'm shocked because I just proposed a photo about Trump and there are people who think the same but you accuse me of being a sock puppet. I have no problem with anyone else. It's just that I'm confused when I submit a proposal for a new Trump photo and there are people who have the same opinion as me, I am accused of using a sock puppet. Maybe I shouldn't submit a proposal for a new Trump photo anymore? I am actually an Independent and not affiliated with any party. That's why I submitted a proposal for a new Trump photo with a smiling face to be on par with Harris's photo which is also smiling. But if you want to silence my opinion and accuse me, I am willing and sincere.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry, including WP:LOUTSOCK. Yamla (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a little mistake while editing, which I regret. Please unblock me. I apologize if I made a mistake. Will I be blocked for life just if I make a mistake? Please give me a chance. I have always contributed to Wikipedia and you can see my work record. Please give me a chance. If not, please don't block me for life. Thank you very much. Teknologi Positif (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not "blocked for life". You are blocked without an end date, which only means that you must convince an admin to remove it. Please describe specifically what you have done wrong and what you will do differently in a new request. 331dot (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply" 331dot (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Previously I was accidentally detected using a sock puppet. Actually I didn't know about it on Wikipedia because I was still learning a lot about editing on Wikipedia. I tried to contribute more to Wikipedia by editing articles, then I was detected using a sock puppet that I didn't know and didn't deliberate. Then I was blocked and because of that I regretted it and tried to learn more about Wikipedia's rules. Of course. I am ready to admit all my mistakes. I know this is a serious matter. Therefore I apologize to everyone I have harmed. I beg to be given my trust again. Is it possible to reopen my blocked account? Please, give me a chance. Thank you very much. Teknologi Positif (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You already have one open unblock request (see below), adding a second will not help your case. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teknologi Positif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Previously I was accidentally detected using a sock puppet. Actually I didn't know about it on Wikipedia because I was still learning a lot about editing on Wikipedia. I tried to contribute more to Wikipedia by editing articles, then I was detected using a sock puppet that I didn't know and didn't deliberate. Then I was blocked and because of that I regretted it and tried to learn more about Wikipedia's rules. Is it possible to reopen my blocked account? Thank you very much.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Teknologi Positif (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One open unblock request at a time, please. No need to make multiple simultaneous requests. --Yamla (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to address your attempt to lie to us, here and at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teknologi Positif/Archive. This is a serious matter. If we can't trust you, we can't really unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I am ready to admit all my mistakes. I know this is a serious matter. Therefore I apologize to everyone I have harmed. I beg to be given my trust again. Thank you very much. Teknologi Positif (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give me a chance. Teknologi Positif (talk) 18:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On your sockpuppet account, you recently requested an unblock saying ”I do not know and have no relationship with Teknologi Positif. Although I come from the same country, I have no relationship with him. I give the same opinion as him on the talk page but it does not mean I am part of the sock puppet.”[1] Yamla told you to address your lie, but your response instead is to double down on your lie..? Clearly you are not ready to be a constructive editor. I say, keep the block in place. Prcc27 (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so rude to me? I have already admitted to all the actions I have done above. What GBUDJT did was someone who spoke using his own account. I have admitted that my actions were wrong and I admit that this is a serious problem. Therefore, I am learning more about Wikipedia because as I explained before I still have a lot to learn. I hope you have good intentions towards me. Thank you. Teknologi Positif (talk) 18:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit wasting our time with your lies. Prcc27 (talk) 20:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further attempted block evasion as Confirmed sock, Commentator4547, including a further attempt to mislead us about this. --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]