User talk:Tejas Subramaniam

This is the talk page to my homepage (i.e. User:Tejas Subramaniam).

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tejas Subramaniam. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Tejas Subramaniam, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Noam Chomsky

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Noam Chomsky you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HAL333 -- HAL333 (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Sarsour

I know that you are interested in left-wing politics. Would you like to review the article for Linda Sarsour, the controversial feminist activist?MagicatthemovieS (talk)MagicatthemovieS

Drive-by GA noms

Hiya! Wanted to leave a note that it's generally frowned upon to nominate articles for GA review when the editor hasn't edited the article or engaged the talk page to see what the page's editors think. I encourage you to do either on the pages you have nominated for review. czar 11:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that; thanks for letting me know. Tejas Subramaniam (talk) 14:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Manmohan Singh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manmohan Singh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Manmohan Singh

The article Manmohan Singh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Manmohan Singh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 11:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Noam Chomsky

The article Noam Chomsky you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Noam Chomsky for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Noam Chomsky

The article Noam Chomsky you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Noam Chomsky for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CodexJustin -- CodexJustin (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello Tejas Subramaniam. I notice in a couple of recent edits you have removed the very common phrase "committed suicide" and replaced it with something not as successful. There have been a number of discussions among editors about this very thing, one of them is here, and consistently the decision has been not to do this. There are, i think, several reasons: One, and perhaps the best, is that the phrase is, as i say, very common, probably the most common way to refer to the act of killing oneself; a second is that the replacement language is almost always not as smooth, nor necessarily as accurate. I also note that in one of your edit summaries you indicated that you were following "journalistic practice"; you should note that we follow our own practice here, not some other, arbitrary, authority's direction. If i can help in any way, please ask. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 09:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LindsayH: Alright, then, I wasn’t aware of Wikipedia standard practice here. Thanks for letting me know! Tejas Subramaniam (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Nigerien crisis

On 8 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Nigerien crisis, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. qedk (t 愛 c) 21:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]