User talk:Technology90210

Welcome!

Hello, Technology90210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ronnie c wright, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zeus^u|c 18:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronnie c wright

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronnie c wright requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Zeus^u|c 18:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Technology90210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ronnie Charles Wright is an American inventor, author, computer programmer, Internet entrepreneur, and philanthropist. He is best known as the inventor of acronetics, a technology used in mHealth and self-help and founder of social network ageFINE. Wright launched ageFINE as a student enrolled in Finance at Stanford Graduate School. As the author of 13 books and a self-made millionaire he is a perfect fit into Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

That's all very well and good, but you are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and that's what you'll need to address. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the record, I only have one account and do not know C. Cabot Churchill. Further, my computer is new, only used by me and requires a password.

Hmm. Looking at your deleted article about Wright vs. other now-deleted versions of the article, it's hard to see much similarity other than topic. Yours also isn't acceptable for Wikipedia, but it's nowhere near as bad as the others. Reviewing admin: please look at Ronnie C. Wright and then Ronnie charles wright; they do seem stylistically distinct. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Technology90210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Technology90210 (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No valid reason given for unblock. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The evidence is clear. There is no connection between this account and account owned by User: C.Cabot Churchill.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Technology90210 (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Technology90210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

This account is unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems that your intention is to create yet again a promotional article on a person who clearly fails to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Whether this account is a sockpuppet or not is therefore not of great importance. Nevertheless, I will comment on the sockpuppet issue. It looks to me as though you are very likely to be the same person as before, and I do see several resemblances to the editing of the previous accounts set up to promote the same person: resemblances that would be very unlikely to occur from a completely unrelated new editor with no contact with whoever made the earlier accounts. In particular, I find the suggestion about "someone with much better knowledge of Wiki markup" surprising, as your editing clearly shows a lack of knowledge of wiki markup. However, as I have already said, that doesn't matter much, as you are in any case not going to be unblocked to write your promotional article yet again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Administrators: The only valid reason, I can give is truth. The reason is truth. There is no connection. Can you please provide a valid reason to block my account. Fact is: One administrator wrote, "it's hard to see much similarity." This should be valid reason enough. Thanks.

Given User:Jpgordon's comment and reviewing the two versions myself, it is plausible that Mr. Wright hired someone to write his page a few years back, and when that person was not successful, subsequently hired someone with much better knowledge of Wiki markup to write the article. That said, we're not going to unblock you so you can resume creating a bio page that has already been deleted as non-notable 9 times (using various spellings) over the years. If unblocked, what kind of edits do you intend to make? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, Sir - Mr. Wright didn't hire me...I don't know Mr. Wright...I heard him speak in Beverly Hills and it inspired me to research and discover no Wikipedia article on him...second, he is more notable than most of the articles of people written on Wikipedia...please explain - help me understand why my account is blocked. I have discussed this issue with people in technology and they explained that most articles are written by public relations professionals, especially for celebrities. I'm not a PR person and I do not know Mr. Wright for the record. Please unblock my account. In the spirit of integrity, fairness and equal access. I have not broken nor abused any rules. So, truly level with me and tell me what gives.

I'm willing to assume good faith and believe that you are not a sockpuppet nor were you hired by Mr. Wright, but I'm telling you right now that further attempts to create a bio entry will result in deletion (in fact, the correctly-capitalized title, Ronnie C. Wright has been salted, and attempts to create articles at alternative spellings will also be deleted and salted. I'm sorry that you can't or don't want to understand why the individual doesn't meet our WP:BIO notability criteria, but the deletion history should tell you that there is a consensus within the Wikipedia community that he does not meet those guidelines. So I ask you again, if you are unblock, what types of edits to you intend to make? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, I seek to write about technology people, places & things that have made contribution to mankind. Second, Ronnie C. Wright is "worthy of notice;" he is "significant, interesting and unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia. Why would you "salt" him? Have you researched him?as a written account of that person's life. Is there something that you know about him that is not in the public domain? In all fairness. Please unblock my account. I'm playing my the rules and policies outlined by Wikipedia.

I'm not responding to further requests unless you agree to stop trying to create an article about a person whom the Wikipedia community has already determined to not meet our notability criteria, period. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(I've removed the multiple unblock requests - you don't need to start each reply with a new "{{unblock}}", just type your reply) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir: This is a professional request to unblock my account...your tone is personal...why? The Wikipedia community has not determined this at all...in fact, only a few editors have commented and they primarily refer to cut and paste created by someone I do not know and, not associated with my account; so, I ask again...have you personal researched Mr. Wright's academic and professional notability?...If you can answer this then I could perhaps agree to what you ask...your tone and attitude is not professional at this point. Please answer the question and please unblock my account.