User talk:Tea Mariamidze

Tea Mariamidze, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tea Mariamidze! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	hustle hard girl Bossmom89 (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to cite sources

In Gori, Georgia, I had to remove one statement from the 2008 conflict section, as it lacked a source. Feel free to find a source and add back what I removed.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020: COI on your user page

I noticed that your COI declaration has <nowiki> tags. If you remove them, it will render correctly.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Rustavi 2, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your email

When editing Wikipedia, all content needs to be written in your own words. Paraphrasing is often not adequate - your additions must not include any wording from the source material. One thing I find that works for me is to read over the source material and then pretend I am verbally describing the topic to a friend in my own words. Stuff should also be presented in a different order where possible. Summarize rather than paraphrase. This will typically result in your version being much shorter than the source document. There's some reading material on this topic at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing and/or have a look at the material at Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words. Check out the links in the menu on the left for some exercises to try. Or study this module aimed at WikiEd students.

Since you don't know how to do basic things like locating other user's talk pages, I recommend that you study some of our help pages such as Help:Contents or Help:Introduction to get started.

Please see Wikipedia:Changing username for a guide to changing your username. However, changing your username will link this account to the new one, it might be a better idea to start over, creating a new account using your selected nickname.— Diannaa (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roofit Solar Energy (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roofit Solar Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roofit Solar Energy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 03:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roofit Solar Energy (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Roofit Solar Energy may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bogger (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Roofit Solar Energy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roofit Solar Energy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello Tea Mariamidze. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Roofit Solar Energy, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tea Mariamidze. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tea Mariamidze|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer:. Thank you for your feedback. I have not received any compensation for this draft article. Tea Mariamidze (talk) 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Roofit Solar Energy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roofit Solar Energy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing again

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Tea Mariamidze, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tea Mariamidze|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 10:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong:. Thank you for the message. This is not a paid edit or paid article. I just collected info about the company. As for the edits, the draft got rejected twice this is why I edited it. Please let me know what shall I do next. Thanks. Tea Mariamidze (talk) 10:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you should do next is fully disclose your blatant conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roofit Solar Energy (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

undisclosed conflict of interest needs addressing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roofit Solar Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roofit Solar Energy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– bradv^🍁 14:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roofit Solar Energy

Hello, Tea Mariamidze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roofit Solar Energy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]