User talk:Tddaly

Wikipedia is not a directory

Wikipedia is not a directory and especially not one for affiliate links. It's also not the online Yellow Pages. I am referring to your contribution to the search engine marketing article, which I did revert. p.s. I like the MarketingSherpa too and own the SEM benchmark guide and SEO and SEM buyers guides. You too? Cheers! --roy<sac> ^Talk! .oOo. 12:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see response here --roy<sac> ^Talk! .oOo. 05:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Warmsentimentslogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Warmsentimentslogo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Finallogo sendtec.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Finallogo sendtec.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sendtec.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Sendtec.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Banyan Tree 20:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rashad Evans

I don't know much about the topic but I don't doubt you're right. I was probably a little too trigger-happy at the time having to deal with some of the vandalism generated from UFC 103. Sorry, and thanks for fixing it! --aktsu ^(t / c) 13:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking it up though, this local newspaper says "[he] was a two-time All-State wrestler at Niagara-Wheatfield" and this article from his school and this article from MMAJunkie calls him a "two-time all-state wrestler in high school" (the article from his school says "at this school"). Am I missing something? --aktsu ^(t / c) 14:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View

As I am sure you know, maintaining a neutral tone and point of view is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. A recent review of edits to the article Steve Santarsiero indicates a bias tone and constitutes disruptive editing. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Please refrain from posting material that is poorly sourced or clearly serves to advance your own agenda as a plaintiff in a legal dispute. Variety312 (talk) 23:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]