User talk:Tdbostick

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm still a little new to this. I went back and signed the post I had forgotten to sign. Tdbostick (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Tim[reply]

June 2010

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Charles Darwin. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 14:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing my own comment! I do use the sandbox, but sometimes I don't catch everything the first time. I would never edit someone else's comment. Relax, I'm a bit new here.Tdbostick (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Tim Bostick[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Heiner Schirmer (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Also, please see WP:CIT on how to properly format citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:R. Heiner Schirmer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tdbostick, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! I'm slowly adding the html formatting to the journal references (one down, twelve to go). I'm in contact with a couple professors who will let me know if they find any press releases or other outside sources that I can cite.Tdbostick (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Heiner Schirmer has been accepted

R. Heiner Schirmer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katja Becker has been accepted

Katja Becker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]