User talk:Tauʻolunga

attention

Useful discussions which are still open will be preserved on this page, but gossips, thank yous, unthank yous, etc. will be removed.

Notification of articles for Speedy Deletion

[CSDs retracted; they no longer apply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Heritiera littoralis. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --健次(derumi)^talk 07:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

problem solved. Hey, give people with slow internet access a few seconds to repair mistakes! --Tauʻolunga 08:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSDs are retracted (I've removed the notifications above). It didn't make sense to have two articles redirecting to each other, as they had originally started out. As one of the articles is now a stub, the CSDs no longer apply. Apologies for acting too promptly. Good luck with your article. --健次(derumi)^talk 08:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50_TOP_Obverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50_TOP_Obverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 07:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:20_TOP_Obverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20_TOP_Obverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:20_TOP_Reverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20_TOP_Reverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50_TOP_Reverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50_TOP_Reverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

belated welcome

Hello, Tauʻolunga! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanzBot (talk) 01:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Mala'ekula sources

Hello. Thanks for helping to build Wikipedia. Can you cite your sources for this? Wikipedia needs verifiable sources whenever possible. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 23:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tongan Language Tables

I don't know maybe your computer has it different or something but when I look at the tables in their current form, they are all black. That's why I took away the colours. If you find a way to actually show the colours, you should put it like that. Munci (talk) 10:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then I am afraid there is something wrong with your computer or browser, as the colours are generated by standard html codes. In fact they are even limited to the old 216 web colours only.

3 hexdigits colour

6 hexdigits colour

The only thing I can imagine that you have an old browser, not able to deal with 3 digit colours. Do the two orange table cells above look different to you? --Tauʻolunga (talk) 06:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it appears you are right. The one on the left is black and the one on the right is orange. The computers provided by my uni are obviously old. I think the table should be in the wiki format for tables in case anyone else has an old computer and that's what tables are supposed to be in and that would take less code space up anyway. Munci (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then the problem is easily solved by changing the colours in the article to 6 digit values. I can do that. But I am not going to wikify the tables, because I always mistake in the proper syntaxes for that. But you can do it, of course. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Cool colour scheme now I can see it. Munci (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tongan music notation

A tag has been placed on Tongan music notation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – jaksmata 22:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reconsidered

After looking into this more, I think the article should stay, but I've deleted the text that was a copyright violation. This left the article very short, but people will still be able to follow the link to the webpage that describes the notation. Same as noted above: if you want to re-add the description of the notation, please do it in your own words rather than by copying from other websites. – jaksmata 22:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomy image software

Hello Tonga, I have been admiring the images that you add to articles. What software do you use to create the astronomy images, such as this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Outside_view_of_precession.jpg Thanks in advance. Dotancohen (talk) 10:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema 4D, but probably any other 3D drawing program would do as well. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 09:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Are the celestial sphere images available somewhere, or did you create them yourself? If so, are they available for download? Thanks! Dotancohen (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just any starmap mapped onto a sphere. I do not have the originals any more. Much easier to recreate when it is needed again than try to find them in a dusty archive, not to speak that the program used in that time to read the file now probably does not longer exist. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 05:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Tauʻolunga, thanks! Dotancohen (talk) 10:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Late (Tonga)

Why did you revert my recent edit? --Stepheng3 (talk) 05:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you are right, sorry. I thought ID stood for identity rather than Indonesia, but it was ID_ and not ID| --Tauʻolunga (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PROD: Michael G. Horowitz

I've declined the proposed deletion of Michael G. Horowitz. PROD is intended only for uncontroversial deletions, as it appears that you were using PROD, after having blanked the article, to end a content dispute, PROD is clearly inappropriate. This does not mean that I do or don't believe the article should be deleted, it merely means that PROD is the wrong process. If you'd would like to pursue having this article deleted, please list it at Articles for Deletion, you'll get no complaints from me. If you would like assistance resolving the content dispute (which is on a subject I know absolutely nothing about), please drop a line at my Talk page. Thanks! --j⚛e decker ^talk 21:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Tupou V

I removed a highly POV paragraph that did not link any sources. If you feel it belongs, please re-add it in, but make sure that it has a neutral point of view. The previous passage only mentioned criticism, but did not include sourced information like [1], which says "local Tongan community leaders say it was right for him to have attended the festival in Scotland". And something such as "accused him of being too wrapped up in himself and insensitive to his people's grief" (from the previous version) definitely needs a linkable source, otherwise, it's not very verifiable. Happy editing, Spencer^T♦C 21:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On reading the other mentioned Herald articles, his supposed indifference was more an accusation from the local newspapers, to boost their own sales probably, than that of the people. It has nothing to do with his personal life too. Leaving it out. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PM Lord Tuʻivakanō

Hi. Are you absolutely certain it's "Sialeʻataongo Tuʻivakanō", rather than "Sialeʻataonga"? The spelling with an "a" gets over 2,000 Google hits, including articles in reputable media (including Matangi Tonga), and the CIA's page on the Tongan cabinet. The spelling with an "o" gets just 87 Google hits, most of them mirrors of one another, and only one is a media article usable as a source. I see you've mentioned Planet Tonga to source the move, but I very much doubt Planet Tonga constitutes a valid source for Wikipedia's purposes. Unfortunately, there's no information yet on Tongan government websites, so unless you have a reputable source proving that the spelling with an "a" is wrong, I think we should revert to that spelling. Aridd (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am quite certain. ʻAtaongo is a common name in Tonga, although somewhat rare, while ʻAtaonga is not. ʻAta-ongo has a meaning (many meanings in fact, not sure about the right one: far-carrying/well-known freedom/openness), while onga does not exist. Siale (flower) is a very common name. The proper writing of the name is probably Siale ʻAtaongo, but merging them would not be extraordinary.

Indeed it is remarkable how secret Tuʻivakanō's real name appears to be, or his familyname for that matter (Kaho). I guess one day a biography will appear somewhere with them mentioned, but when?

I also did these Google searches already in December, and at that time there was barely any hit for both. I cannot escape the conclusion that Idiotsavant introduced the name Sialeʻataonga on 9 December and that all hits you see now are just copies of it. Wikipedia is a trentsetter! And where did he get it from? Genealogical Gleanings - a site which does not exist anymore, but which I have known in the past to contain spellings errors. Planet Tonga in this respect is not better and not worse. So if we have to go by these types of sources, everything is 50%-50%. But at least these sources are original. I knew this error already for some time, but have waited with the change until I found it in at least one such source. Matangi Tonga? I have watched it all the time: not a single time they have used the name.

Absolutely certain? No, 99% at most. But ʻAtaonga is even less sure. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Given the paucity of sources, and your knowledge of Tongan names, that makes senses (even if it doesn't really abide by Wikipedia's policy of "Verifiability, not truth"). Thanks for the clarification. (As for Matangi Tonga, if you Google "Sialeʻataongo Tuʻivakanō", one of the first hits is a strangely truncated title of a Matangi Tonga article: "Siale'ataonga Tu'ivakano by 14 votes to - Matangi Tonga Online". But if you click on the link, the name no longer appears. Seems they initially included it, then dropped it, for whatever reason. Aridd (talk) 08:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finally found an official biography. Should we change the title of the article to Siale ʻAtaongo Kaho ? It would be better. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20 TOP Obverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20 TOP Obverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20 TOP Reverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20 TOP Reverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:50 TOP Obverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:50 TOP Obverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:50 TOP Reverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:50 TOP Reverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mu'a.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mu'a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Taparub.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Taparub.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vavaʻu Academy for Critical Inquiry and Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tongan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tongan national anthem

Who wrote the words? Book source said Tēvita ʻUnga but the official site of the palace says its Uelingatoni Ngū.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So probably no one knows, and the historian who yells loudest is the one who will win the fight and get right. But I have never heard anything else than Uelingatoni Ngū. --Tauʻolunga (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solomone Ula Ata

Thank you for uploading the pic of Ata. Can you help by putting a more dignified portrait of King Tupou IV in his info box rather the the porr one that is currently there? Castlemate (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures I have may not survive Wikipedia's stringent copyright rules --Tauʻolunga (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ma'ulu'ulu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ma'ulu'ulu.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doubledrummer.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doubledrummer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tauʻolunga. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Equation of time

You made substantial changes to Equation of time in 2006. Several edits have been made to this section recently, and there is still a request for citation after the table giving minima and maxima of the equation of time. Would you please explain where you obtained these values from? Jc3s5h (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea anymore; there are so many books giving this table. And does it matter as the fomulas to calculate it are given farther down? --Tauʻolunga (talk) 05:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Portrait mode" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Portrait mode. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#Portrait mode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Captain Galaxy (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ʻIlima Lei Tohi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ʻIlima Lei Tohi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ʻIlima Lei Tohi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 09:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tongan Funerals

Hi, I've copy edited the article Tongan Funerals. I haven't changed the meaning of any of the sentences but if you want to check that, I'd be very grateful. Red Fiona (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]