User talk:Tara Kate Turkington

Welcome!

Hello, Tara Kate Turkington, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello Tara Kate Turkington. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tara Kate Turkington. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tara Kate Turkington|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Theroadislong, and thank you very much for your message and the time it took to give the helpful advice you have. I have uploaded some pictures to Wikimedia Commons and have done a few small edits of articles in the past, but this is my first attempt at my own article. I am also sorry I have taken so long to respond to you - I have been away on summer holidays.

I would like to categorically state that I am not being compensated directly or indirectly for my entry or edits. I was merely excited to add an entry I think is deserving, particularly during this time of Covid-19, when blood supplies are critically short in South Africa, where I live.

I am a past journalist and now a professional communicator and tour guide, and wanted to make a contribution back to Wikipedia, which has given me so much over the years. I was hoping this contribution would be the first of many - I would also like to contribute, for example, to the entries around the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site, about which I know quite a bit, and to other topics as I get more au fait with the processes of Wikipedia.

I hope the article might be useful enough to be published after I have done any edits you suggest. Please could you let me know what the next steps are? Tara Kate Turkington (talk) 17:43, 2 February, 2021 (SAST)

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Tara Kate Turkington (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - what exactly do you need help with? Thanks, ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Cape Blood Service (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject needs multiple, independent, references to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Western Cape Blood Service and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Western Cape Blood Service, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tara Kate Turkington! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Western Cape Blood Service

Hello! I came across your article today, and have cleaned it up and moved it to mainspace. This organization had three different names, so searching for the older names showed pretty quickly that it is notable. The name that the draft was under has only been used for two years, so it had not generated much press coverage. Ergo, it did not look notable. Thank you very much for your contribution to Wikipedia! --- Possibly (talk) 06:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very, very much! I am so grateful! I was on the point of giving up and thinking I would never get something published on Wikipedia :) --- Tara Kate Turkington (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louis Jansen van Vuuren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Jansen van Vuuren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Jansen van Vuuren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheLongTone (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheLongTone - please could you let me know the reasons you deleted my article on the artist, Louis Jansen van Vuuren? What could I improve so that it can be approved? Many thanks.