User talk:Tamer Gunner

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Houses of the Holy, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Artwork.elmorabba3.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork.elmorabba3.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:00, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Great Gig in the Sky, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 04:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of El Sekka Shemal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Sekka Shemal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Sekka Shemal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Cairokee. Rob van vee 04:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matloob Zaeem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matloob Zaeem, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Arabic Rocks. Please stop adding unsourced genre's to articles. Continuing to do so will ultimately result in the termination of your editing privileges. If you need help sourcing, this is your last chance to ask.' Rob van vee 16:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found here. Rob van vee 16:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits, specifically making repeated unsourced genre changes despite repeated warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemian Rhapsody

Please discuss you change on the talk page first. Some editors might not approve of your source. Genres on wikipedia are very touchy. Thank you, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Album.elmorabba3.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Album.elmorabba3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Minorax (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Wearing the Inside Out. Rob van vee 04:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have taken to adding genre's with sources that don't actually make any mention of said genre's in the source. I will be going through all your edits later when I have time, reverting those that are not properly sourced and if you continue doing this, your next stop will be WP:AIV. Rob van vee 04:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even when a source is provided that does mention the word, it is something being taken out of context, e.g. the line "With its funk-rock strut and widescreen view of humanity..." from a list article to support "funk rock". ValarianB (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The Wall. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FlightTime & ValarianB, we are going to have to keep a constant watch on this disruptive editor given their tendency to add unsourced genre's or adding sources that make no mention of claimed genre's. Not to mention their complete lack of communication here. Rob van vee 05:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Reported. Rob van vee 06:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Rob van vee 08:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time (Pink Floyd song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TD Place (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Tamer Gunner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about El Morabba3 (album)

Hello, Tamer Gunner

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, El Morabba3 (album), should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Morabba3 (album).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matloob Zaeem

Hello, Tamer Gunner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matloob Zaeem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, thank you for waiting for six months to facilitate the possibility of modification or adding more information to the page Matloob Zaeem, and I respect your deletion of it after this period. Secondly, I could not add anything else because I was almost permanently banned, and I am currently waiting for six months until I ask to cancel the ban, which will almost end in December 2020, if I get unblocked, I'll think about what I can do. Tamer Gunner (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tamer Gunner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I am sorry for any article I sabotaged about a year ago and that led to my ban indefinitely. I also apologize for being stubborn until I created another account or two to continue sabotaging. I got what I deserved and learned a lot from Wikipedia politics almost the entire time I was banned. It's been about six months now and I ask you one last chance to prove my goodwill. I promise you guys that you will not regret canceling my ban. Tamer Gunner (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm going to assume good faith and see what happens. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to whomever ends up reviewing this: I don't see any evidence of socking via CU. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SQL: Here is one Tamermostafa99. There was another one but I don't remember it because I only used it for one editing and didn't sign in again. I think it has been closed completely for the passage of a year or more. Actually, I need some help to unblock my account. Tamer Gunner (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jpgordon: so much for accepting the request, I promise I won't let you down. So, what's next? Tamer Gunner (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just edit without calling attention to yourself. I've removed the ugly box from your user page. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you again. Tamer Gunner (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artwork.tarafalkhait.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artwork.tarafalkhait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Artwork.dropofwhite.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork.dropofwhite.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the copyright holder for this image, I uploaded it about two years ago and was ignorant of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies at the time. So it is better to delete this image immediately. The same should be done with these images (File:Cairokee.naswnas.jpg / File:Artwork.uglyduck.jpg / File:Malyoun.jadal.jpg / File:Artwork elmorabba3.jpg). Thanks for pointing this out to me and I apologize for my ignorance of the instructions. Tamer Gunner (talk) 23:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I have now tagged the other four images as missing evidence of permission too, for deletion in one week. If you want them delete immediately, you could tag them with {{db-g7}}.

In my opinion, File:Malyoun.jadal.jpg could be re-tagged as non-free and remain in Malyoun. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cairokee.naswnas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cairokee.naswnas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Artwork.uglyduck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork.uglyduck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Artwork elmorabba3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork elmorabba3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Artwork.dropofwhite.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork.dropofwhite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Creep French single by Radiohead.png

The file File:Creep French single by Radiohead.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Displaying more than one cover art discouraged normally by WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring the more successful UK reissue...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creep by radiohead reissue.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Creep by radiohead reissue.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:High and dry live package EP.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:High and dry live package EP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bends (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bends (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bends (song)

The article The Bends (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bends (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bends (song)

The article The Bends (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Bends (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]