User talk:Talk2023112

This is Talk2023112's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukunmi Oluwasina (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject is most likely notable but this draft is not properly sourced. Kindly provide citations with reliable sources. It also seems like the author wrote the draft for the sole purpose of promoting "Wizmatic".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 10:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizimatic! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 10:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina. Thanks! Princess of Ara 07:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly check. Removed the wikipedia link and added a more reliable source

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukunmi Oluwasina (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are six sources: 1 is an interview (primary), 2 is a list of nominees for a prize (a trivial mention, which does not verify the claim that she won), 3 is some kind of gossip column, not appropriate as a source in a biography, 4 is a website called opera.news which says explicitly that it has no editorial oversight (so it can't be used in Wikipedia), 5 is a reliable source, but the article is another primary source, only reprinting a letter written by Oluwasina with some boilerplate text below, and 6 is three sentences with zero content, posted on another gossip website, which explicitly states that it doesn't guarantee the correctness of its information.

There are also various external links in the article body. Those have to be removed. Maybe some of them can be used as sources, if they are turned into references.

However, at this point it does not look like Oluwasina meets these notability criteria.

Finally, almost every sentence is promotionally written.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 18:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bukunmi Oluwasina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk2023112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

talk2023112 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I haven't received any payment for previous post made, the post was not made for promotional purposes, the reason why it was declined at first was because it was leading to an external link (wizimatic) which I removed in the second edit before resubmitting, it wasn't intentional to make the post promotional. I am a close person to this notable figure, hence, the purpose of my contribution to this great platform. I totally understand the rules and regulation of this great platform, and the need to block when being violated, and I never intended to do that neither will I repeat such mistakes again. I wish to be a great editor on this platform with my contribution which will bring about more awareness and knowledge to wikipedia users. Thank you

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username would be acceptable. I don't think that you are merely close to the person that you wrote about and/or wrote about them by chance. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing and tell what specific topics you will edit about without violating those policies. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that you don't have to be specifically paid for edits to be a paid editor, any paid relationship with a subject triggers the disclosure requirements.

331dot (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit already declined unblock requests. Any further comments need to be made as either new unblock requests or just standard comments. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talk2023112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am going to start the article afresh without making the intention of the article look promotional, either to look as promoting the notable figure or promoting other brands. I have read both articles of conflict of interest and paid editing and I sincerely apologize for the mistakes on my end. I totally understand now and it wasn't intended initially. the new article will be a biography as well as RELIABLE references/sources to work done

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

globally renamed Wizimatic to Talk2023112

globally renamed Wizimatic to Talk2023112 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]