User talk:Takkygirl1153/sandbox
1. I think the article does a good job encompassing many sources. There is obviously a lot of information out there, and it is important to cut it down accordingly.
2. I think linking to other articles is very important, as well as significant context around the arguments. I feel you do a good job with writing in this way. I'd imagine the audience for the article may have better knowledge on the background than me, so maybe it is not as important. It depends who this is being written for. Having the start be a general overview and then the rest be the perspectives/definitions would be good. The beginning would open up the rest of the paper to reader of all backgrounds. The beginning should be a vague Femme definition such as "it meant feminine characteristics that apply to any gender/identity/person
3. I feel there are arguments within the quotes. I think if you pull the important parts, you can start to bucket similar words and ideas to help define the word.
4. There are so many definitions, which is similar to Made in the USA which has vague definitions. I will make comments on this controversial topic in my article.
Start a discussion about improving the User:Takkygirl1153/sandbox page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Takkygirl1153/sandbox" page.
