User talk:Tajmashaik

Welcome

Hello, Tajmashaik, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Nomination of Karishma Sawant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karishma Sawant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karishma Sawant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why do you think it should be deleted Tajmashaik (talk) 08:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel it shouldn't be deleted Tajmashaik (talk) 08:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karishma has just started her acting career. That's why she doesn't pass notability grounds. That's why Anagha Bhosale and Muskaan Bamne articles were also deleted. As both didn't pass notability criteria Pri2000 (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Karishma Sawant, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I didn't see Tajmashaik (talk) 02:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pranali Rathod did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 14:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever content you want to add on Wikipedia articles has to be verifiable, which means that reliable sources must be able to support the material. Please read: WP:REFBEGIN, WP:RELIABLE and WP:ICTFSOURCES. If you need anymore help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or visit The Help desk for interactive assistance. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 14:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

hello Tajma. After an user alerted me I observed that you have copied exactly same text like science student and the Indian Citizenship templates along with using exactly same type of language that I used on my user page and removing extended confirmed user tag from your user page. It's a request please change the content of your user page according to type of language in which you feel comfortable otherwise it can lead both of us to be blocked on the grounds of being thought as sockpuppet users of each other by other users. Please maintain good faith on Wikipedia. Pri2000 (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i will change it Tajmashaik (talk) 01:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Pri2000 (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome Tajmashaik (talk) 09:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other's user page

Though you made good faith edits, but there's no need to edit other's user page. If an editor wants to edit their own respective page, than they'll do it themselves. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Tajmashaik (talk) 07:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith editing

You really need to stop stalking and stealing other's edits. You literally copied the exact whole information with references from the Draft:Tiku Weds Sheru and created a new page Tiku Weds Sheru with it, you precisely just stole my work which I was going to submit in January next year. This is surely so not done. You've been stalking other editors and their edits, copy-pasting details right from user pages to drafts to articles. ManaliJain (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You also did the same earlier as well, copying everything from Draft:Karishma Sawant and pasting it to Karishma Sawant. Creating direct articles like this by copy-pasting other's effort won't work! ManaliJain (talk) 05:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I Didn't mean to do that but i want to create a page of 'somya Daundkar, but it is getting to deletion so,

and i thought the person who created karishma sawant draft didn't know how to post it so made a page and same happens with tiku weds sheru Tajmashaik (talk) 07:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tajmashaik: Whether the editor knows how to post it or not isn't a matter because if an editor is creating a draft than they surely know that it's to be submitted for review and then it'll get published as an article but you just copy-pasted the content and directly created an article and that's what I'm talking about. Karishma Sawant isn't notable and that's why the particular editor made a draft but didn't submit it and Tiku Weds Sheru would have been submitted for review probabaly by next year. Anyways, I hope you won't repeat these silly things next time as it's unfair for other editors whose work you copy-paste. ManaliJain (talk) 13:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tajmashaik, To have an article on wikipedia ,it must pass WP:GNG.Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you pls explain it to me on Instagram Tajmashaik (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deleted tiku weds sheru, hope you are happy, I know the pain Tajmashaik (talk) 07:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be sad ,we are just following the guidelines.Princepratap1234 (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is the process to delete page on Wikipedia,see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. What you did on Tiku Weds Sheru is not deletion of the page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to make a new page Tajmashaik (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tajmashaik: page on which topic?Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@manalijain i am giving a word Tajmashaik (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have a fan page for somya Daundkar,I wanted to make a wikipedia page which has been deleted twice Tajmashaik (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made draft for that page Tajmashaik (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She is not notable to have article on Wikipedia. It must pass WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR to have article. You can try to create a draft and submit it, if it passes notability criteria it will be accepted but I know she is unnotable so very difficult to have page on here.Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ya it is in draft Tajmashaik (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be vigilant with your edits

You reverted my edits on Draft:Somya Daundkar and Draft:Doll Daundkar unnecessarily and then you reverted your own reverted edits. Please be careful with your edits as you are persistently making unconstructive edits despite getting reverted and being warned. If you want to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or visit The Help desk for interactive assistance. ManaliJain (talk) 12:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sorry Tajmashaik (talk) 13:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits bcoz the content I gave was correct

later I reverted my edits thinking if anyone may block me from editing Tajmashaik (talk) 13:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, the content you gave was incorrect plus you also used copyrighted images which you can't. Please read WP:IUPC, WP:FILMOGRAPHY and WP:REDLINKS once since you are making too many disruptive edits. ManaliJain (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

then what image should I use? content is incorret? 🤔 Tajmashaik (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See, you use images from instagram, pinterest etc. on Wikipedia which isn't allowed. Generally most of photos of Indian actor/actress which have appropriate license are available only at Bollywood Hungama website (See c:Template:BollywoodHungama), that too only from parties and events tab. There are a few images which are screenshot of YouTube videos, but that kind of videos are very few. Example: see this video from which Ashi Singh's infobox image is taken and check the license mentioned in video's description, only that kind of license (Creative Commons Attribution license) is allowed here. So now I hope it's understood to you and you won't add copyrighted images again. ManaliJain (talk) 15:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it is an Instagram photo Tajmashaik (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I explained you above that we can't upload images from websites to Wikipedia as it's a copyright violation. And yes, that includes images from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest and basically every other website. Read WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:IUPC to know more in detail. ManaliJain (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can we be friends Tajmashaik (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Somya Daundkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Somya Daundkar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv^🍁 05:15, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you pls delete that page Tajmashaik (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. If you want to write more fan pages for people, make sure you have proper references, and please go through the AFC process rather than move them to mainspace yourself. – bradv^🍁 05:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually new to Wikipedia Tajmashaik (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me to delete the article and then you promptly recreated it? Why? – bradv^🍁 05:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shaiksuhana2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shaiksuhana2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv^🍁 05:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock puppet of that acc Tajmashaik (talk) 05:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

first I created this acc and I forgot about this acc

and later in oct 2021 I created that acc and I had been blocked for disruptive editing later I remembered this acc Tajmashaik (talk) 05:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

pls un block me I will delete that id I don't need that I'd pls un block me 😭 Tajmashaik (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajmashaik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

first I created this acc and I forgot about this acc and later in oct 2021 I created that acc and I had been blocked for disruptive editing later I remembered this acc

Decline reason:

If you're blocked on an account, then start using other accounts effetively evading your block, that's abuse of multiple accounts.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please elaborate as specifically as possible. What are the account names that you have created here? SQL ^{Query Me!} 08:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BbbB23

Bbb45 Bro256789 Bri20785 Tajmashaik Shaiksuhana2 Tajmashaik (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajmashaik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pls give me a second chance I promise I won't Vialote thr rules.

Decline reason:

Multiple instances of sockpuppetry including attempts to evade scrutiny by deleting text from the SPI. Your best (and probably only) chance of an unblock is via the standard offer of appealing after six months without any editing at all. In that appeal please also include details of what articles you'd like to work on, and some indication you've read policies like WP:SOCK. -- Euryalus (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock| I understand that I've made multiple accounts which led me to be a sockpuppet, Even though I didn't have any bad intention, It happened, unfortunately, I clearly understand why I was blocked so I want to start a new chapter of This Account and I am ready to contribute for good. You can delete that account, I promise there won't be any problem from my side, Hope I will get a Second Chance.

Thank you. I'm looking forward to your response. Tajmashaik (talk) 10:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user is now apparently editting logged out as 2409:4072:610c:64ba::76f:90a5 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). See filter log for attempts to disrupt SPI. —Wasell^(T) 10:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajmashaik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I've made multiple accounts which led me to be a sockpuppet, Even though I didn't have any bad intention, It happened, unfortunately, I clearly understand why I was blocked so I want to start a new chapter of This Account and I am ready to contribute for good. You can delete that account, I promise there won't be any problem from my side, Hope I will get a Second Chance.

Decline reason:

Putting aside that you submitted another request when it is clear you would need to comply with the standard offer, you now seem to be trying to disrupt sockpuppet investigation efforts against yourself. Such a monstrous act of poor faith in the unblock process means I will be removing your talk page access Nosebagbear (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]