User talk:TaipanKing2000
TaipanKing2000, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi TaipanKing2000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC) |
October 2021
[edit]Hello TaipanKing2000. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TaipanKing2000. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TaipanKing2000|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 10:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Hi David Gerard Thank you for your message. I am not being paid for my edits/contributions, nor do I have any relation to the subjects. I am just creating pages for persons I believe are of significant importance to their respective fields.
Clearly, from your message, my contributions do not seem to meet Wikipedia's standards/regulations. As such, I shall not not be making anymore contributions/edits. I apologise for any inconvenience caused, and you need not worry about my contributions/interference any longer. Regards, TaipanKing2000
Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice
[edit]Talk pages
[edit]So, you'll notice that I've indented my comments when they are replies to you. This is something we use to make the flow of conversation - who is responding to whom - clear. You do this by using a colon (:) in front of each line you indent. If you add two colons (::) it indents it further as well.
You can also use bullet points at times by using an asterisk (*). You can indent these like this :*
And don't forget to use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your posts. It really helps. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC) |