User talk:Table tennis pic

Welcome!

Hello, Table tennis pic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 08:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Table tennis pic, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Table tennis pic!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mouma Das

Any further reverts by you will result in a block. You are not reading the edit summary to fix the problems. 1) NO ALL CAPS. 2) Do references properly. A bunch of refs at the end does nothing. References need to be inline. See WP:REF on how to do this. Ask questions. Ask for help. But no more reverts and no more adding material without references. Bgwhite (talk) 06:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been protected for 72 hours. Your editing is totally unacceptable. An article is not a big loooooong list with ALL CAPS and bold everywhere. Bgwhite (talk) 02:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't a clue on what you are doing because you refuse to talk. Articles are not a big long list. A reference section is not a big long list. DON'T USE ALL CAPS!!! Don't use bold everywhere. For Pete's sake, what are you doing? Bgwhite (talk) 05:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete all this data and records,I can try to edit as you say, I will delete few data which may not too important,and also try to change bold letters in small. And please do not delete data because all this data very useful for Sports knowledge. If you think you can edit few things but do not delete the data.

No, it is not useful. It is way too much. It is presented in a horrible format. There are no references.

Look at Venus Williams or Rafael Nadal as examples on how an article should be done. Bgwhite (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards

Now,99.99% data deleted: Done by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.

Now there is a big question about the Wikipedia's Authentication. People from India and other place should know about real the truth behind the wikipedia. Any one can edit or delete the data.

Now,99.99% data deleted

Done by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.

December 2015

Your recent editing history at Mouma Das shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
(Pinging Bgwhite.) — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about Edit war.It is all about feelings for our National Sports person,Say example you have 20 Awards if I tell you please show only 5 Awards, or write only 5 awards in your bio-data instead of 20.Think this way then you can understand it. About blocking or deleting as a Authority of Wikipedia you can,but it is sure in India we loose trust in your site,due to this half hearted work and only 10% information,Now upto you what you want to...Thanks Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards

Now,99.99% data deleted

Done by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing and edit warring, as you did at Mouma Das. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tito Dutta (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mouma Das

Please do not keep on adding the same text as the content you are trying to add in Mouma Das is not following Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I strongly suggest you to read these pages:

If you continue to edit-war in the article, you may be blocked from editing. --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Tito Dutta

I know why you try to delete the original details of Mouma Das. You not want that people should know the actual data of A sports person. It is not about edit war it is all about your personal attention to hide all the records of a Sports Person from Bengal.

As your wish we will try to put attention of Indian Sports Ministry regarding this misrepresentation of a Sports person.

Dear Anonymous editor, please learn the rules pertaining to addition of information in Wikipedia. By edit warring and accusing Tito of bad faith, you are neither helping write a good article on Mouma Das and also sullying your own reputation in this regard. Dont threaten Tito in this manner or you will get blocked from Wikipedia. AshLin (talk) 13:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your edits, it seems that you are Mouma Das, or are a friend or relative. Please read Conflict of Interest. If that is true, you need to stop editting this article and allow neutral editors to add to this article. AshLin (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second User:AshLin. --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Mouma Das, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. John from Idegon (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John from Idegon Is Indian Sports Person Performance is Spam for Wikipedia,then wikipedia should ban in India....Why you mention all the details as Spam,It is insulting our country.Why you did this John from Idegon,Please give valid reason...waiting for your reply...

Bull. I am insulting your terrible editing, not your country. If you ever bothered to look at any other Wikipedia page beside this one, you would have noticed that none have anywhere near as many external links as you added. After two months of ridiculously bad edits, you STILL cannot even remember to sign your talk page posts. What exactly is your relationship with the subject of this article? Is it idolization, or are you being paid? And if you cannot construct a sentence in English any better than "Is Indian Sports Person Performance is Spam for Wikipedia,then wikipedia should ban in India....Why you mention all the details as Spam,It is insulting our country", why are you editing on English Wikipedia at all? Competence is required, by policy. How about you make some kind of demonstration that might lead a reasonable person to believe you have the requisite competence to do this? John from Idegon (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mouma Das

Only add the table. Do not do anything else. Once you add the table, I'll go over it and clean it up. Do not add a huge list of external links. Bgwhite (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Sure,I will do it,Thanks

ONLY add the table. Nothing else. Bgwhite (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bgwhite As per your guidance now only table is updated.

Proposed deletion of Book:Mouma Das

The book Book:Mouma Das has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1 page book. Download as PDF feature is simpler for 1 page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated book prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the book's talk page.

Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated book prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes still exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]