User talk:Ta bu shi da yu/Archive13

Perhaps a returning problem

I have just received an annonymous demand for information about an article regarding Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black and I have left a reply on my Talk page that I will be happy to respond, if I know who or what I am responding to. I also left an entry on the User's IP Talk page and this led me to look closer, and that is when I discovered that IP 128.143.218.12 is User:4640orFight about whom you had written Because you have given us so much trouble, I am blocking you permanently. If you have a problem with this, please take it up on the Wikipedia mailing list. - Ta bu shi da yu 04:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC). Someone else had added: "sockpuppet of Noah Peters". As IP 128.143.218.12 the User has made several recent edits to pages about various judges. Just to give you a heads-up in case this person is a returning trouble-maker. MPLX/MH 19:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

you're unprotected

brace yourself for the nazi hordes :) — cheers, dab (ᛏ) 23:18, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why me? :P Ta bu shi da yu 23:36, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bye bye jerk!!

I guess this means you will not be crying about the Nazis anymore. What is your problem with Nazis anyway? Did you date a Nazi woman and she broke your heart?? What a shame!!!

Broke my heart? That's not all she broke! *shudder* Ta bu shi da yu 23:54, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your life isn't worth living anymore so pleasee KILL YOURSELF!

You know I'm right. You've felt this way for a long time. You've probably been thinking about killing yourself for quite some time. I'm here to tell you, it's all right. Go ahead. Do it. It won't hurt. Be brave. All your troubles will be over. You won't have the pain anymore. Everyone else? Don't worry, they'll get by. You never really did fit in in Australia or anywhere else for that matter. Do what must be done.

So, this is coming from the Melbourne StormFront chapter. See [1]. - Ta bu shi da yu 23:56, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What do you mean It's not your fault things turned out badly? It certainly IS your fault. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for what you've done in your failed life - and failed to do. Maybe things could have changed if you weren't such a weakling and hate-filled person. You're defective. You've been that way for a long time. You are proof that God makes mistakes.

You disgust me. You should have died a long time ago. You know I'm right.

(readded by Ta bu shi da yu - if they want to look like complete idiots, let them!) - Ta bu shi da yu 23:46, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think you might be confused. The reason I want to kill myself is because I dated a Nazi woman! Oh the horror! - Ta bu shi da yu 23:47, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yay!

Happy Birthday to me, happy birthday to me! - Ta bu shi da yu 00:28, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Heya! Happy (fourteenth) birthday : ) --MPerel^{( talk | contrib)} 00:56, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Happy fifteenth birthday! :-) from Lupo, who thinks that counting is an art. 07:15, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ooooh you're right! I need to go back to counting school! --MPerel^{( talk | contrib)} 06:19, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Happy birthday, Ta bu! — mark ✎ 07:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Congrats Ta bu! hope you have a nice day! Mgm|^(talk) 08:58, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

What?! I missed your birthday? 'Hope you had a great day. Happy (belated) Birthday! SWAdair | Talk 06:15, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sorry I'm so late...happy birthday Ta Bu!!! (do you mind if I call you ta bu? :P) -Frazzydee|✍ 01:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Perverted-Justice.com

I was wondering what kind of help do you need for this article, since I see that on the talk page that yall are in a deadlock. Zscout370 03:32, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NVM, the page is now fixed and all templates have been removed. Glad that is over. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations...

on getting your article into /. :) It's nice seeing you again. I noticed that you're kinda-sorta-maybe still here ;) glad you haven't completely abandoned us!

Regards,

Frazzydee|✍ 01:02, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sum and difference formula (trigonometry)

Hi, this your article, is listed in the Wikipedia:Deadend pages. Don't you want to do something with this? Like, adding some text to math? Mikkalai 21:47, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Big fish...

I see the big fish is still biting the bait of the hook which is called Wikipedia. As the corny line from Japanese anime and drama shows go, "Fight on! Yaa!" -- AllyUnion (talk) 10:30, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Deletionism

You see, darling, the thing about truth is that once released it can never be supressed, no matter how much you try to remove the first copy, there are always others.

See encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Jesus_and_syncretism

ChiveDreams 17:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ummm? I don't care! Firstly, that's an old copy, no longer really endorsed by Wikipedia. If CheeseDreams wanted (after their ban), they could always edit History of Christianity/Jesus, pre-4th century Christianity, and syncretism and merge it into that article, as was suggested on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jesus, pre-4th century Christianity, and syncretism. - Ta bu shi da yu 23:16, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

In case you didn't know

You might want to see Exploding toad if you haven't already. :-) -- Sundar (talk · contribs) 10:59, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

This time, you may call the bluffing toads: "Ta men bu shi da qing wa!" -- Toytoy 15:01, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

expos/nationals debate

There is a major debate going on, and I wondered if you might want to chime in. The debate involves how to deal with franchise moves in baseball. The question is whether Montréal Expos should be its own article or if it should redirect to Washington Nationals. All other instances of franchise moves in MLB redirect the old team name to the new team name, and the history of the franchise is covered within the new team name (for MLB, NBA and NFL examples, see here. Some people are confused and think the Expos and the Nats are different teams. Some people don't want to upset Canadian readers.

Indeed, the Washington Nationals are not a new team - the Montreal Expos franchise has moved to Washington, and the old franchise name should redirect to the new franchise name, just like the 20+ instances of this occuring in Wikipedia. For example, Brooklyn Dodger history resides in the Los Angeles Dodgers article. New York Giants history, including the Shot Heard 'Round the World, resides in the San Francisco Giants article.

If you have the time, maybe you could chime in on the conversation there, Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Montréal Expos. Kingturtle 23:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Windows Driver Model

Not sure if you're interested, but I've noted what WDM drivers are on the talk page. Haven't looked at the main article, but if you want to merge, go ahead. However, you'll need to reference the following:

Finnel, Lynn (2000). MCSE Exam 70-215, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server. Chapter 1, Introduction to Microsoft Windows 2000, pg 13-18. Microsoft Press. ISBN 1-57231-903-8.

HTH. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Omegatron 13:26, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Hello

Hope you can help out with something. User:ElKabong appears to have pretty blatantly violated 3RR. How do I file a complaint?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Islamofascism#How_many_reverts_of_the_page_is_that_for_ElKabong.3F

Many thanks, BrandonYusufToropov 16:07, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind -- another admin took care of this ... BrandonYusufToropov 12:01, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

YOU'RE BACK!

Yee haw! Wikipedia has just become fun again! Sis boom bah, baby! Sheep and whales are exploding all about! Please don't be a stranger. I'm already strange enough for the whole damned site. :^P Talk to you next week (I hope) since I'm going away for the weekend. All the best, Lucky 6.9 07:10, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

welcome back. Great news. Filiocht | Blarneyman 08:22, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

LOL! I promise not to let it slip that you're only editing for a half-hour a day. Ironically, I've decided to take a wikivacation, perhaps a permanent one. Like you, my real life is becoming filled with a lot of other projects. Stay in touch, OK? - Lucky 6.9 16:27, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy Gold!

Just for general humour you are the latest in a small list of recipients of the Comedy Gold award. I hope you can spend your 30 minutes of wikitime productively and directed towards the pursuit of laughter. violet/riga (t) 08:59, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Wilbanks

How's the Howard Kurtz citation? (He didn't specifically use the words "media circus" referring to this, but he did elsewhere in the article and he described the same concept. Plus it allowed bringing runaway bride up to the introduction... Samaritan 00:54, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As John Sebastian Sang

Welcome back! PedanticallySpeaking 17:30, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

how to become a fat bastard

As to a question you posted on wp:rd sometime back. You can get really fat fromcompetitive eating I'd imagine. --Wonderfool t (c)e) 23:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exploding whale

What was that?? BTW, did you notice that we now even have an exploding human? Lupo 08:42, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Please comment on Jguk's most recent actions [2], [3]. It seems to me that he is destroying what I thought was a carefully constructec (though not, of course perfect) NPOV article. Frankly, I think we may have reached the point where arbitration or at least mediation is required. I honestly do not believe Jguk understands or cares about NPOV. Slrubenstein | Talk 15:14, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Why do you disagree with the scholars? Do you disagree with all of them, or some (which)? Do you disagree about everything or some things (which)? Curiously, Slrubenstein | Talk 04:16, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV proposal

Have you read my proposal to ammend the NPOV policy? Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/BCE-CE Debate I'd like to know what you think, you might want to join the debate. Slrubenstein | Talk 04:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

You know I respect your opinion. Though I wish you had voted otherwise, I am not going to try to change your mind. But I do hope you have/will read my proposal thoroughly, and explain your responses to me, if you don't mind. Curiously yours, Slrubenstein | Talk 05:19, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I think you are ignoring this [4] and this: [5]. In and of itself, your position is reasonable — except I do not believe it is in accordance with our actual NPOV policy. I quote the policy in my proposal to support my claims. Do you think I am misinterpreting or misusing these quotes? Slrubenstein | Talk 06:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ta bu shi da yu! I would be interested in your response to my question here. Would you defend the common parlance if it made similar religious statements about Krishna rather than Jesus, or would you favor more neutral terminology that still referred to the common calendar conventionally used in Western society but made no such explicit religious statements? --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 06:34, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dawson's Creek

When I had the article up on peer review last fall you said you were inclined to support it if it went to FAC. Well it has now and I'd appreciate your vote [[6]]. PedanticallySpeaking 16:30, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome Back!

Welcome Back, Ta bu shi da yu! Hope you enjoyed your Wikiholiday. It's good to have you back. -- Chris 73 Talk 09:49, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Indeed. Just take it easy this time; it's not as if you were obliged to do anything here. Lupo 10:17, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AOL! (read "me too") Rhobite 19:58, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Adminship Addictive

Recent empirical observation suggests that wikiholism and adminship do not mix. Subjects get much stronger addiction symptoms than might be expected from either substance alone. Therefore, I must at this point in time vote to reject your adminship, and point you to wikipedia:rehab.

What? There *is* no page at rehab? Eh? My samplesize is n=4 or so? Hey but I'm supposed to sound all official and all! You're ruining the effect! ;-)

Kim Bruning 15:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

offensiveness

Ah, I, err, cannot remember *blush*. I believe you were pursuing a troll rather, err, persistently, and I disagreed with that, and somehow held a subconscious grudge ever since. I can be unreasonable that way... :) – ugen64 00:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, just ignore it and forget this whole incident ever happened. Surely, it embarassed me... :) – ugen64 01:21, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Wikipedia missed you. E=MC^2 T@lk 01:24, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you back-back?

Either way, welcome back! So, looking for some vigilance editinging? Keep sights on NZNF. All the best, El_C 02:12, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you back back or only back back? ;) Welcome back. Rick K 22:18, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Substub

In response to your query, what happened to substubs... due to the hard work at WP:WPSS, there are very few stubs left (dozens rather than thousands) so there was no further need for a differentiation between stubs and substubs. HTH. R adiant _* 07:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Your Username

Hi. I'm a high school Chinese Language student, and would like a translation on your username. Without characters, your name could mean anything, but my translation of it it "He/she is not fish". Am I correct? Enlighten me. Harro5 04:28, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Your Chinese is good. See Kuro5hin, where TBSDY explains his name.-gadfium 08:26, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back. Your skills have been missed thus far. JuntungWu 07:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, welcome back! :) - Mailer Diablo 08:26, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Welcome back

Thanks for welcoming me back too. After imposing those self-imposed restrictions on myself that I listed on my user page, I feel absolutely no Wikistress. Editing here has become more fun again. I no longer get involved with all of those highly debated articles and policy discussion. Anyway, see you around. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 18:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now I guess we have something both in common: leaving editing on Wikipedia for a while then coming back. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:00, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this may be a little premature, but congratulations on becoming a admin again in a few days. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:00, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, Ta bu!

Seriously, Ta bu, you're asking the wiki superlamer. Sorry, but when it comes to techspeak, I can't even spell. The only reason I'm online is my kid keeps some alien machinery oiled up. And furthermore, you're asking the very person whose Most Conceited New Admin Pufferfish Award you're threatening, by this perverse recasting of yourself as a nube admin! Get real, and welcome back, it's great to see you! --Bishonen | talk 12:48, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An impersonator?

Hey Ta bu shi da yu. Can you explain this? If it was a joke, it's not really funny. Otherwise, consider this a notice that someone else probably has access to your account. Phils 16:03, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Switching my RFA support to oppose for now. This makes me wonder if it's the same person and I cannot support giving an untrusted person administrator rights. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on WP:ANI has also started on this very issue. Please explain your reasons there. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you decided to withdraw your RFA. I think that took a lot of guts to admit your mistake and make that decision to withdraw. I don't know how many other people would have done that in a similar situation. Anyway, see you around. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:52, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously for real

Ta bu, I for one can easily see how a thing like that could happen. Don't let it get you down, you are indeed most welcome back!--Bishonen | talk 03:51, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're not feeling too happy right now, and that several people changed their votes. But many more didn't, and though I can't speak for them I wouldn't have changed my vote even had you not withdrawn your nomination. You still have a lot of fans out there, Little Fish. Yes, those edits weren't a great idea, but everyone makes edits or comments they later regret. And the beauty of a wiki is that these things can be easily fixed. As User:Mark said on your RFA, I'd rather have an administrator who did the occasional harmless prank than one who abused administrative powers to force bias on articles or blocked users inappropriately. The community pointed out your mistake and I'm sure you won't do it again. I respect your decision to withdraw your nomination, but I hope you will consider renomination in one month—if no one else nominates you by then, I would be honored to. And if you do decided to keep your nomination up, you still have my support. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hear, hear. Let's not let a little bump derail the train. TBSDY does lots of good work here, and people shouldn't forget that. I won't, anyway. I'll also support a VfA after another little while, when the time is right. Fire Star 04:21, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As one of those who changed their vote, I can assure you that I didn't mean for you to withdraw your nomination, nor did I think the nomination would fail (I moved from support to neutral). It was a message to you, and one you obviously got loud and clear. I'd probably have moved my vote back to weak support after your apology. I'll support you if you renominate in a month.-gadfium 05:35, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Knowledge Seeker. The Dalek edit was a joke gone wrong, but I still would support you for adminship. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes. Now you should a) not do it again, and b) otherwise forget about it and cheer up. You're still a great user (admin?)-- Chris 73 Talk 05:42, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Your nomination

I have removed the link to your nomination subpage from the RFA. I felt that your wishes were made clear when you withdrew your candidacy, and when you requested no further votes be made. In a month or so, I would be honoured to renominate you (but I'm sure there will be many people jockeying for that privilege). Cheers, and may the force be with you. :) →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 05:15, 2005 May 24 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that I do. Anyway, if it was required but I didn't add it, it'd be a lot harder to rectify, because someone would have to notise that it hadn't been added. →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 05:33, 2005 May 24 (UTC)

Hey

Don't let it get you down. Just continue your generally excellent work, and it will all blow over. Rick K 05:48, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

I feel like I have to say something more about your situation because I find it a little similar to what happened to me about a month ago (This happened when you were still on your wikivacation). If you look at this page, it seems that it only takes one simple idea or mistake, and people will suddenly criticise you -- just because of that one simple mistake. For me, it was all because I was a little to eager to put articles on VFD. Luckily, it is just only one thing and it can be corrected. Anyway, don't let it get you down. Just be patient, keep on working on articles like Windows 2000 and other janitorial tasks, and you may find yourself on RFA again. Best wishes. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I second Rick. Absolutely ridiculous, man. People around here can't take jokes. I've done a smiliar thing before and it still comes back to haunt me on occasion. Anyway, you are one of the finest editors I have even seen around here, and I hope you decide to stay... Much regards. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 06:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. What a tempest in a teapot. Take heart. It doesn't matter, because you're cute - Cute editor admirer 07:03, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! - Ta bu shi da yu 07:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look on the bright side: you get to skew the 'statistics' in User:Blankfaze/admin for this nomination! Hmm, I just noticed that he has myself denoted as nomination eventually failed, I should probably block him for his inattentiveness! Maybe he just really wanted me to fail! :D Of course, he dosen't speak to me, likely a recepy for mishaps and hilarities to come! El_C 07:36, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Except he didn't appear to have voted! It seems that he has won this round! El_C 07:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I also see the funny side. Thing is, I don't vote to give anyone admin powers if they engage in vandalism; it's nothing personal.

Demonstrate good behavior for a month or so and I'll probably have changed my mind. I don't mean you have to be a saint; just don't do anything else really bad. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 07:41, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TBSDY – the withdrawal of my vote for you was not actually because you had vandalised the article, but because I was concerned that your account had been hijacked. You have my support whenever you want it. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 08:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your quality as an editor (one of the few, the fine) is still unquestionable. I cannot agree with users who consider this nothing but a harmless joke (it was the main page article, after all), but I, as well as everyone around is fully counscious that this is one mistake in an otherwise absolutely brilliant record. Keep up with the good work. Phils 09:14, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

To my mind your prompt apology and withdrawl carry greater long term weight than the initial misjudgement. --Theo (Talk) 12:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I realize from your post on WP:AN/I that you were demonstrating the quick-response nature of Wikipedia to a friend. While I don't support the method you used, I still admire that you admitted your mistake and rescinded your nomination so that you could apply later under better circumstances. As when you stepped down from adminship, I think you did the right thing in this case as well, and I think that despite these two instances of bad judgement, your behavior overall has been in line with what Admins should exemplify. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 14:38, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Another way to demonstrate this, if you want to show a friend later, is to use the Heavy Metal Umlaut video. See http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/gems/umlaut.html . Hope you are doing well, by the way. Email me sometime. Pravoka 00:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

By being upfront about what you did at Daleks and then withdrawing your nomination I think you did the right thing. I looked at some of your recent contribs (Microsoft) and you are obviously an excellent editor, and assuming there is no repeat (as I am sure there won't be) I would not hesitate to vote for you if you renominate in 3 months. I grew up with the Daleks (Dr Who was easily my favourite programme as a kid) so I can see the humour, but some of the vandalisms we meet are funny and it doesn't make them less vandalism. I can well imagine how terrible you felt last night, but hope it doesn't keep you down for long, or put you of working here/wanting to be an admin again, SqueakBox 19:04, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

I agree. It would have been so much easier to say that someone else hijacked your home computer and made those joke edits, but you didn't, and came right out and admitted your mistake. I don't vote for (or against) adminship very often, but I'll gladly vote for you again when it comes up. --Death phoenix 20:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Marge:         I'm sure God will let us return soon.  I mean, how 
               long can he hold a grudge?  [Marge wakes up in 
               church]
Lovejoy:       Forever and ever ... [turns a page and continues 
               reading] ... and ever and ...

—The Simpsons, "Simpsons Bible Stories". Wikipedia can easily be worse at times. Please reapply as soon as you think it's prudent. I have a support vote lying around that isn't doing anything constructive at the moment. JRM · Talk 08:37, 2005 May 25 (UTC)

Thanks!

Uh—thanks—I'm kinda flattered—loss of words... Lupo 08:13, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

September notes

Tnx for doing them. I have yet to read up on this tag and learn it :) Looks really nice. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:53, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FAC Help

Salve, TBSDY!
Haven't talked to you in a while; hope all is well. I've nom'd one of my articles at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bob McEwen on Congressman Bob McEwen and I would appreciate your comments there. PedanticallySpeaking 14:45, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Windows 2000

In all honesty, I was (*yawn*) about to go to bed. From a quick look, I see the same jargon (because its a copy), so whatever your fix is can be applied to both I presume. I was going to give the PR a closer look tomorrow, and now I'll do so for both. PS, could I suggest Port Jackson for your next focus article? I have always been amazed by the pics I've seen, and am a quite clueless American on the topic. When I looked it up I was a little dismayed by the sort of stubbish article. Anyway, until tomorrow, happy editing! --Dmcdevit 08:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Our Gang.

Thanks. I saw the comments about the dubious references in the "imposters" sections, and I understand the concern. I revised the section and used different references. --FuriousFreddy 14:50, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Riot of 1879

Thank you for your kind comments on WP:FAC. I'm a bit puzzled by your suggested improvements - did your edits to the article deal with the point, or is there something else you're suggesting? Kind regards, jguk 20:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 2000

Meant to leave you a note last night, but forgot. Just wanted to say I love what you've done with Windows 2000. AlistairMcMillan 10:35, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

Definitely interested. I'm never sure how much time I'll have, and I have a habit of... oo shiney thing... getting distracted, but it really kinda bugs me right now how little depth most of the Microsoft related articles have. It's only rarely that we get above the level of the kind of stuff your average Slashdot poster would know. And aside from the usual battles over at "Internet Explorer" no other pages really get that much attention. Anyway some co-ordination, assuming that is what you mean, would probably be a good idea. AlistairMcMillan 03:27, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)