User talk:TVNEWS11

Welcome!

Hello, TVNEWS11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your changes to Latif Yahia

Greetings! I see you've removed some criticism from the Latif Yahia article. Wikipedia articles should be written from neutral point of view, including both positive and negative information about the subject.

There seems to be disagreement about whether to include the criticism. I suggest you present your reasoning for removing the text at Talk:Latif Yahia. That way, the involved editors can discuss the situation and reach consensus on whether to include it. —C.Fred (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Latif Yahia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Your recent editing history at Latif Yahia shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Latif Yahia, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 23:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and persistent deletion of sourced material with no explanation or discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal at Latif Yahia

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Latif Yahia, you may be blocked from editing. JFHJr (㊟) 20:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Latif Yahia. DVdm (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for disruptive editing - repeated removal of cited information, despite previous block and warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have problems with this page, please discuss them on the article talk page. Do not simply remove cited information from the page, and do not delete discussions from the talk page. For advice, see WP:BLP/H. JohnCD (talk) 13:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TVNEWS11 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JFHJr (㊟) 23:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your block evasion with AMA2010 I have extended the block on this account until 12:00, January 26 2012.
Seeing that both your talk pages are filled with complaints about your disruptive edits, I strongly considered making this block indefinite, so I urge you to take this as a final warning: Please try to understand why your edits were considered disruption, and adjust your behavior accordingly in the future. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask.
Amalthea 14:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit summaries

Please be careful with edit summaries like the one in this edit. Wikipedia has a very strict policy prohibiting legal threats, and "Yahia should get his lawyer onto this" is language that heads in that direction, especially if you're perceived by anybody in the community as having a conflict of interest with Yahia. —C.Fred (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Username concern

Hello. I noticed that your username (TVNEWS11) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because It sounds like a role account or an organization which we don't allow. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]