User talk:TRAiNER4

				[[image:\|30px]]			Contributions by Month
User	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Images	Email	View Subpages	Statistics
Current Time: 16:54, Tuesday, November 12, 2024 (UTC) Reset

Thanks for the.. well.. thanks!

Awww, thank you very much for your thanks on my PlayMania emall! I was rather pleased to have my email read, and I'm even more pleased that you recognized me. =) Chad1m 05:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

note to self

TRAiNER4 ^{[talk] [email]}

TRAiNER4 ^T_C

— JT (TRAiNER4) ^T_C

— JT (TRAiNER4) [^T_C][E]

—TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib)

A new userbox

Notes to self are usually good. ;) Anyway, I created a new userbox I think you might be interested in listing:

PM	This user is a PlayManiac.

There's no shortcut for it, yet, but you can click the "edit this page" button to see the code if you'd like to use it yourself. Enjoy! - Chad1m 23:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aww thanks. I took the liberty of making a shortcut for you. {{User:TRAiNER4/Playmania}} --TRAiNER4 ^T_C 01:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--— JT (TRAiNER4) [^T_C][E] 16:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! =P

Thanks very much. And yes, I know I can't sing, but if Shandi Finnessey asks you to sing, you had better sing. =) — Chad "1m" Mosher ^EmailTalk _Cont. 05:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oy!

Wow, have I been cursedly lucky this weekend or what? I got a call for the Missing Link game ???? STRING/HORN/LACE. I didn't make it into the Player's Lounge, but I was held on the line. I thought they might let me carry over into the next game, but sadly, they didn't. =( All well, that's more luck than I deserve. — Chad "1m" Mosher ^EmailTalk _Cont. 07:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tone down the sig html?

All that html that gets inserted when you sign a comment kinda clutters up the wiki page and makes it difficult for other editors to pick the comment from the sig. Any way you could compress it or use a bit less? Thanks. Gronky 22:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the liberty of changing my signature html. Is this better? — JT (TRAiNER4) [T·C·E] 22:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playmania

Please review the discussion I have started on the talk page regarding the reversion of the edits made by me this morning. Erechtheus 18:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maint. tags from articles (as you did to Playmania) without fixing the problem the article is tagged for. In this case the article needs to cite sources. You can check out verifiability, reliable sources, writing about fiction, and original research to see the policies on sourcing articles. Cheers. L0b0t 00:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the reversions by you and the other gentleman to the talk page (which is frankly pedantic in in and of itself judging by the majority of the talk pages on Wikipedia) is clearly missing the point. Yes, the opening paragraph describes the ostensible method of entry in the show. it does NOT address the question, however, of timing or any of the other issues raised in the initial talk comment. What exactly is it you find so offensive? There is valid commentary on people who have come up with ways to "game" radio contests and American Idol- how is this any different? ChrisStansfield 20:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find it offensive in any manner, as it is fair, HOWEVER, it does not pertain to the article itself, which is why it was removed. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 20:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly does potential rigging of entry into Playmania not pertain to the Playmania article? Explain the logic there. 20:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChrisStansfield (talk • contribs).

The reason no timing issues are addressed is because quite frankly, they are unknown. They change from episode to episode and unless one of us works on the show (which we do not), we will not. Your comments were removed from the talk page simply because they refer to the show itself and not the discussion of the Wikipedia page of PlayMania. This is standard for all television show talk pages and is not simply just to gang on you. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask. Thank you! — Chad "1m" Mosher ^EmailTalk _Cont. 20:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So the simple semantic inclusion of the preface, "Should we talk about the issues of timing on entry on the article, because this seems to be an issue:" would merit the inclusion on the talk page? Because that clearly is the intent of the talk statement- that these things need to be addressed on the page itself. ChrisStansfield 20:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find an applicable source for entries being rigged, or if you can find someone who works for PlayMania (highly unlikely), then by all means, include it on the page, in a Controversies section. Otherwise, it really isn't supposed to be included on the talk page itself, as it's general discussion, not about the article itself. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 20:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's, well...kind of a snake eating its own tail for an argument, isn't it? You say yourself that it is unlikely that Playmania would offer a source regarding timing issues (even though most game shows in my experience like, say, Jeopardy, make it very clear to contestants how many seconds they have to ring in, how long the lockout is on a jump-the-gun buzzer answer, etc.) By the same token, if I wanted to ask on the 1,000 Flushes talk page whether anyone has ever tested to see if it really lasts 1,000 Flushes, that would be inappropriate as it's about the product and not the article. And any opportunity to look for evidence one way or another would be disallowed unless the people who make the product collaborate. :)

As the show is hardly even on the media radar, no news source is going to go to lengths to investigate this sort of thing, so any "controversy" (something I did not at all mean to allege, by the way) would come from message boards and the like, which we agree are not acceptable sources. So how exactly does one start any discussion of these things in order to FIND sources if not by use of the talk page? I'm really startled by the notion that no questions can be asked regarding the subject of an article BEFORE a person goes in and just starts editing it. I was under the impression that someone making a good faith attempt to get answers prior to referencing them in the article itself would use the Talk page for that purpose. If it really is that limited, how does one suggest possible additions to an article at all without falling afoul of the concept? ChrisStansfield 21:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to argue about this anymore. It doesn't contribute to the article. It doesn't have any relation to the article or show any signs of it being helpful to the article, thus it was removed. If you want to discuss this further, argue with Bmitchelf as he removed it first and knows what he's talking about. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 21:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:100-Winners-PlayMania-block.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:100-Winners-PlayMania-block.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

100 Winners

Hi, Just a heads up, I was working on the speedy delete candidates backlog and I came across 100 Winners, which is obviously not a speedy candidate. I traced the problem to your last edit on the page. It seems that if you use a tag starting {{web...}} rather than {{cite web...}} you put a speedy request on the page. Dsmdgold 16:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

whoops, my bad. sorry. TRAiNER4 16:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image overuse

Greetings! Earlier today I removed a DVD cover image from Kyle XY [1]. Subsequent to this, you re-inserted the image indicating that it "was not necessary" [2]. Please be aware; there have been multiple, substantial discussions regarding the issue of album covers, book covers and DVD covers used in the manner in which you desire on this page. All such debates have resulted in usages such as this being deprecated due to our policy on this issue which may be found at WP:NFCC items #3(a) and #8. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. But, simply re-inserting the image is not appropriate. Thank you, --Durin 15:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ChrisOlivero.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ChrisOlivero.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Our image copyright policies

Hi, can you please make yourself familiar with WP:NFC and Resolution:Licensing policy before you do any more removal of tags from images or addition of images to articles. You have already been informed of our image copyright policies by Durin. If you deliberately violate them again, you'll be blocked. If there's anything you don't understand, I'll be happy to help, or to find someone else who can help you, but constantly re-adding non-free images of living people to articles, or re-adding non-free images for decorative purposes, after you've been made aware of the policy, is not acceptable. To avoid accidental violation, I suggest you don't add any non-free images at all to articles or remove tags others have placed on images, without first seeking clarification from someone experienced with image policy. Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have and all the rules are being followed. They have the proper rationales, and it follows all the rules, and I'm working with an experienced Wikipedian and he agrees with me. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 14:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say an experienced Wikipedian; I said a Wikipedian experienced with image policy. There is a difference. ElinorD (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been blocked for deliberately violating our policies on the use of fair use images for depiction purposes on biographies of living persons. This is a blatant violation of Resolution:Licensing policy, which you were directed to read earlier. --Durin 14:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you go and block me, yet you all seem to only go after the pages I have on my watchlist, which I find *HIGHLY* suspicious. So I revert them due to suspicious activities. I understand where the block came from, but that seems highly suspicious, whether coinidental or not. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 15:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've performed literally thousands upon thousands upon thousands of edits in support of our fair use policies. You're not being targeted individually. Please see User:Durin/Removal_of_fair_use_images#Stop_stalking_me.21. If despite this, you still think my editing patterns with regards to you are "suspicious" then please make a report of same when your block expires. My offer to assist you in any way I can to place my edits under review, given below, still stands. --Durin 15:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not accusing, or going to accuse anything as I have no evidence. However, I'm just stating it's highly coincidental, that's all, and I'll be glad to take you up on the offer in the future. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 15:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just let me know. Thanks, --Durin 15:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I presume this edit summary was intended for me? If so, please let me know how I can assist you in placing my edits under review. Thank you, --Durin 12:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

24 hour block

Following your repeated refusal to abide by instructions given to you by other editors, specifically regarding our policy on nonfree content, I have blocked your account for 24 hours. You may ask for a review of this block by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on your talkpage. Regards, ~ Riana ⁂ 14:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TRAiNER4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All of a sudden the articles that are on my watchlist are being targeted. Also, I am a good Wikipedian, and I've been one for a few years now (I don't remember how long), and It's really suspicious that all of the pages in my watchlist are being targeted, it's a huge coincidence, if not completely suspicious. I was reverting the removals in an attempt of good faith, not to be malicious. It's also suspicious that the images are being removed and an orphan tag goes up immediately.

Decline reason:

Nothing suspicious here, your contribution log is public for a reason. Your continued violations of WP:FU are grounds for a block. Fair-use images may not be used to depict living people. — Yamla 18:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tiring

Yeah, it gets very annoying seeing all the vandalism. I'm sure not allowing anonymous users to post would help the situation out greatly. Is there a way to get it protected? - zachinthebox 18:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother

It sure is fun changing those back to TBA every 5 minutes...isn't it? - Rjd0060 21:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not in the least... atleast the page is protected from anonymous users so it has winded down quite a bit... —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 21:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is a good thing. And just to make sure you know, I WAS being sarcastic with that first comment. - Rjd0060 16:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you need to look up some of the Wikipedia rules:

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

Live feeds would be considered ORIGINAL RESEARCH:

Wikipedia is not the place for original research. Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked: the only way to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RMThompson (talk • contribs) 20:40, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

For years, the Big Brothers have been created and monitored through live feeds. I don't know what your problem is, you need to lighten up. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 20:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here at school...

...and I want some info on last night's quiznation. How much was given away? How many games in total? How much did the crossword get to? Hurry up - I've got 30 minutes. =D — Chad "1m" Mosher ^EmailTalk _Cont. 14:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Alienating Our Audience; Kyle Hamilton (rower); John Kyle; Brooke Burns; AustNet; Kyle Janek; Contradiction; WWSI; WTVE; List of United States presidential vetoes; Kyle Bay, New South Wales; Kyle Chavarria; List of people pardoned by a United States president; Kyle Airport; Elaine Joyce; EsperNet; Big Ticket Entertainment; CBS Outdoor; Kyle Brandt

Cleanup: List of United States Presidents by military rank; Supermarket Sweep; Cornerstone Television
Merge: Commander in Chief (TV series); List of United States Presidents by date of birth; Announcer
Add Sources: Kyle Switzer; The Crystal Method; United States presidents and control of congress
Wikify: Studio 7; Milton Bradley; Medical prescription
Expand: XHDF-TV; Facebook; WCW Thunder

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I went ahead and...

Thank you. I wasn't sure what to do/how to do it. - zachinthebox _{(User • Talk)} 10:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PlayMania-block.png

Thanks for uploading Image:PlayMania-block.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings revert

Hello... I left a link in my edit summary, but didn't type it correctly - so here is the explanation I was pointing to. Weekly ratings charts are not considered encyclopedic and as such they have been removed. Discussions about ratings should reflect an overview of the series, rather than a string of numbers that only apply to a specific market. (This is in line with how they are treated on television series articles.) --Ckatz^chat _spy 03:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So how about a regular Neilsen ratings chart? Most shows I've seen on wikipedia have it. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 16:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Quiznation-PlayMania-block.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Quiznation-PlayMania-block.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CompUSA

Hey, Trainer: Where did you hear the rumor that they were gonna close them all down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.56.246 (talk) 08:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's talks amongst me and my coworkers and sales associates at the CompUSA in Mt. Laurel... Nothing is confirmed as of yet —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 21:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. It seems as if your store isn't the only place where this rumor comes from. Right now, word has spread all over the Web, with rumor of an announcement on December 7. [Dirty shame that they closed 10 in Jersey to begin with, and left only one.]

If it is true that they have no restocking shipments planned anywhere for February, then this announcement on Friday can't be good.

Your Website

Hey TRAiNER4,
Just checked out your website. You might want to upload something more than a firefox logo. But cool profile anyway. (Found you from the Kyle XY talk page).
YoungWebProgrammer^{Msg me} 02:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TWC Today

Hi, have you ever considered joining TWC Today? I see that you are a fan of The Weather Channel after the contributions you have made to the TWC Wikipedia articles. You'd be a great addition to the forums. If you'd like to join, please do so at http://twctoday.com/forums

BTW, I don't live far from you. I live just to your northeast in Marlton, NJ and Bensalem, PA :) MikeM2010 (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TWC Classics

Hey, alongside TWC Today. there is a website called TWC Classics. http://twcclassics.com/forums It's me chris121 (aka TVTunerGuy) from TWC Today. TWCFanChris (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SteveWilkosS2.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:SteveWilkosS2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WeekendNow2008.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WeekendNow2008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Real World: San Francisco

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Real World: San Francisco. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (Diff) Nightscream (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fp-board.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Fp-board.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISCC.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ISCC.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IntelliStar-New-Blue-LDL-v3.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IntelliStar-New-Blue-LDL-v3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 09:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Real World: Cancun

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with the reunion information in this edit to The Real World: Cancun. Doing so violates Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please make sure you include reliable, verifiable sources when adding material to articles. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WUWA.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WUWA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Finding Judas Screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Finding Judas Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WeatherCenterLIVE.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WeatherCenterLIVE.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Playmania.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Playmania.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PlayManiaTOC

Template:PlayManiaTOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DrPhil Season 7 title card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DrPhil Season 7 title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 07:38, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: New helper policy

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)}[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Myphl17news.png

Thank you for uploading File:Myphl17news.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weather Channel Mets

Do you agree with the proposed deletion of On Camera Meteorologists being discussed about the Weather Channel entry? Keybeeny (talk) 20:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Olivero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Olivero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Olivero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Quis separabit? 00:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Olivero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Olivero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Olivero (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheMoneyListLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheMoneyListLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]