User talk:TPeisker15

TPeisker15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TPeisker15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wargasm (band) (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still nothing satisfying our notability policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wargasm (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Spike in My Veins, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Best of Morbid Angel

The article The Best of Morbid Angel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Unremarkable album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lower the Bar

If you wish to recreate the article for Steel Panther's latest album, please follow this link, click edit the page and create the content over the redirect. Editors should not create articles with capital letters for definite articles (words like "the") and prepositions per MOS:CT, as you did with your recent edits. However, please only recreate the article when you can cite reliable sources to prove the album's notability, otherwise it will most likely be redirected. Thank you. Ss 112 16:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Violence Unleashed

The article Violence Unleashed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable EP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Live at Red Rocks (Disturbed Album)

Hello TPeisker15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Live at Red Rocks (Disturbed Album) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TopCipher (talk) 06:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skeletons in the Closet (Venom album)

Hello, TPeisker15. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Skeletons in the Closet (Venom album), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Great Southern Trendkill, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Old (song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Old (song). SummerPhD^v2.0 14:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wargasm (band) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wargasm (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wargasm (band)

Hello, TPeisker15. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wargasm".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at King Animal Demos. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Parched with Thirst Am I and Dying. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 11:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TPeisker15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]