User talk:TMallinson

August 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raigmore Hospital, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

College of Remote and Offshore Medicine

There was a message left on the article creator's page. Please see that. Also, as a COI editor, you should not edit the page directly, but ask for changes on the talk page of the draft/article.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll have a look and avoid direct edits. TMallinson (talk) 14:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prolonged Casualty Care has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prolonged Casualty Care. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prolonged Casualty Care (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage. Reads like an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prolonged Casualty Care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TMallinson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prolonged Casualty Care has been accepted

Prolonged Casualty Care, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tannim101 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imaginarium Monkey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TMallinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware this was against the rules. Please accept my apologies, very happy to only ever use a single account. TMallinson (talk) 21:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great, go back to your original account and request unblock there, we don't unblock sock accounts. 331dot (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.