User talk:TFFfan/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, TFFfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Wyatt Huber, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wyatt Huber

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Wyatt Huber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of RASN

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that the page RASN has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consisted only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kinu ^t/_c 01:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pensacola, Florida, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Atlantic hurricane season

The month of December is added to the seasonal summary table for aesthetic purposes so the name of Tropical Storm Sebastien fits correctly. Doesn’t matter if December is part of the hurricane season or not. You should’ve noticed this when you published your edits. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Libertarian Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Communist Party USA. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Mirror Cracked: Hello. I have taken this into consideration, and I will now fight vandalism for a good cause. I want this to be forgotten, and I hope that I can be an admin on a few years to fight vandalism! --TFFfan (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This warning which you gave was not justified. The IP's change to the article was supported by the reference he cited. You need to read the definition of vandalism. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: Thank you for the advice! I am just trying to help and not cause any harm. I have stopped doing vandalism myself. --TFFfan (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be much more careful. Your edit to User talk:82.6.50.252 was again totally unjustified. There was nothing remotely defamatory or libellous about the IP's edit, and if you'd taken the trouble to look you would have seen that the text that the IP was removing was no longer supported by the ref given. If you continue with that sort of edit you are liable to be blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This warning was unjustified as well. The IP editor was obviously removing defamatory content from a BLP (which was not supported by the fake source). Magnolia677 (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]