User talk:TDurden1937

Welcome!

Hello, TDurden1937! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 00:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

SORT-OF-SOMETIMES-BUT-NOT-ALWAYS-SEMI-RETARDED

USERBOXES

Wikipedia Accomplishments

This user has been on Wikipedia for 17 years and 1 day.

104+

This user has made more than 104 contributions to Wikipedia.

This editor is a Registered Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

1RR

This user prefers discussing changes on the talk page rather than engaging in an edit war.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 21:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Criticism of science

The discussion of the merge for this article has restarted again after a posting on the helpdesk, I wanted to see what your thoughts are and if they have changes since your last post on this issue considering both pages have undergone revisions since you voiced your opinions. Please check it out and post any changes over here. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 02:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:TDurden527

Just curious, why do you have an alternate account named User:TDurden527? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well . . . lol. I'm not sure. I think I created TDurden527 when I started contributing to the Wikipedia Survey Project, or whatever its called, ha ha. Now things are screwed up 'cause some stuff is posted to TDurden1937 and some to TDurden527. Not sure what to do about it or . . . really what went wrong. Seems it is causing some confusion . . . so I'll have to try and do something about it. BTW, I signed into Wiki using TDurden1937 and now my "User:" seems to be TDurden527. I don't get it.TDurden1937 (talk) 19:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)TDurden1937[reply]

I Quoted You On My User Page

Just to let you know. Wekn reven i susej eht ^{Talk• Follow} 13:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

criticism of science work

if you want to give me an e mail the one i most use is tsp214@verizon.net. but i have checked it infrequently the past month due to a new schedule i've obtained. so it might be better to communicate mainly over wiki talk pages. i wont be able to elaborate in full on any lengthy topic as i've sustained a fractured forearm and can only type with one hand at the moment. however, dont be discouraged, im still more than willing to communicate- i just will be rather short and prosaic instead of my usual long winded, poetic self.

the idea i have so far for improving the article is possibly transporting some of the "philosophy of science" article over to show how criticism from inside scientific circles helped improve it. i just contacted an acquaintance of mine who i consider someone well versed in western philosophy to write about hume and the like in the article. i have yet to hear from him, though. i believe we may be able to take excerpts from the philosophy of science article, and place them in the criticism article with a link to wear it came from for most of it without doing much of an injustice to the topic. i will be better suited for the task after the cast comes off.

regards -PoS (ProductofSociety (talk) 02:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Project: YEC

Think you might want to join? This project section has a lot of potential, but currently lacks direction. Wekn reven i susej eht ^{Talk• Follow} 11:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thanks for the addition to my page. First and foremost, I want the "Creationists" and "Evolutionists" (to use over-generalized terms) to stop the mad accusations against one another. I'm a Biblical creationist myself (YEC) and admit many of us have been over-harsh, including me, towards evolutionists. Visa-versa applies. The Bible tells us how to react in situations when beliefs are in question in 1 Corinthians 1-4. As long as you are a Bible believer, I'm not sure which one is worse: being an angry YEC, or a Gap theorist. Although I believe the origin of the world is central doctrine (maybe not essential, but if you love the LORD with all your heart, soul, and mind, I'm sure He'll want you to trust in his word, but I won't go into the interpretation part just now). To quote Paul, "What do you want? Shall I come to you with a rod? Or in love and a spirit of gentleness?" Thank you. Wekn reven i susej eht ^{Talk• Follow} 14:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Is it all right with you if I move the second part to a (comments on the quote) page that appears right after "TDurden1937"? One reason why I like discussing things with you is that I never get extremely heated responses. Like in a real conversation. Even if we don't agree on something. Perhaps this mentality itself might be good to spread around. I agree with pretty much all you've stated so far. My view of science goes as follows, to quote Roger Patterson: "Science has been hijacked by those with a materialistic worldview and exalted as the ultimate means of obtaining knowledge about the world. Proverbs tells us that the fear of GOD, not science, is the beginning of knowledge. In a biblical worldview, scientific observations are interpreted in light of the truth that is found in the Bible. If conclusions contradict the truth revealed in Scripture, the conclusions are rejected. The same thing happens in naturalistic science. Any conclusion that does not have a naturalistic explanation is rejected." The issue for us then becomes 'what truth is found in the Bible?' Hope to hear from you soon. Wekn reven i susej eht ^{Talk• Follow} 16:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its Okay.TDurden1937 (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)TDurden1937[reply]

Alright then. Wekn reven 15:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Thanks for the link. I'll be keeping an eye on Ichthus and am interested what ya'll come up with.

TDurden1937 (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)TDurden1937[reply]

Icthus

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi TDurden1937! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

706 pound 12 oz shell

Hi there Doug, oz = ounce = 1/16th of a pound. So 706 lb (pound) 12 oz was the old way to designate 706 3/4 pounds weight for the shell. Good to see some interest out there for old military stuff. regards, Rod in Sydney Australia1.129.97.20 (talk) 07:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]