User talk:TDMcr

This is TDMcr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

August 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Suspect Device (song), from its old location at User:TDMcr/sandbox/Suspect Device (song). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, TDMcr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suspect Device (song) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WaddlesJP13 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more references and additional inline citations to the end of uncited paragraphs to verify claims and notability. Please also consider formatting the article properly and dividing it into sections to make this long article easier to navigate and read.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suspect Device (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suspect Device (song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TDMcr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suspect Device (song) has been accepted

Suspect Device (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SLFSuspectDevice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SLFSuspectDevice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SuspectDevice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SuspectDevice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi B, the SuspectDevice.jpg I posted is the front cover of a single and my understanding is that I could use a low resolution image of a cover image if its use is solely to illustrate the audio recording in question. Is my understanding correct? If it is, then I would have thought that my use of the jpg on the Suspect Device page would be OK.

Apologies for taking up your time and bear with me as I'm relatively need to Wikipedia editing. Thanks

TDMcr TDMcr (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Uamaol. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. NPOV is met. The sentence is merely telling of something which has been quoted by the publications. Do you have sources telling this is a "minority partisan view?" Add it to the article instead of censuring it! UaMaol (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Uamaol. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Official Irish Republican Army. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. UaMaol (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m responding to your objection of my edit of the Official IRA page. The article states that the Official IRA “were sometimes nicknamed the “Red IRA” by others”. I think this is misleading as this label was never widely used. The only references I can find to the “Red IRA” label is an article in the New York Times in March 1971 and then repeated in the New York Times Obituary of Seamus Twomey in September 1989.

My concern is that any students, writers or journalists who reuse this label after reading the Wikipedia article would cause confusion as this nickname has never been used widely, in particular in Ireland, to describe the Official IRA.

My proposed deletion of the phrase is not censorship as it is aimed at making the article more accurate and all other references to left wing/Marxist influences in the Official IRA have quite rightly been maintained.

I think my proposed edit improves the article and is in the spirit of building a collaborative consensus.

TDMcr TDMcr (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Clash and Belfast (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asparagusus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Clash and Belfast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 22:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Clash and Belfast has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Clash and Belfast. Thanks! Asparagusus (interaction) 22:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your very prompt feedback. I've amended the draft to take on board your comments. In particular, I have changed the wording to make it a more formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. I have also made changes so that it is written from a neutral point of view and deleted peacock terms. Thank you for your comments. TDMcr (talk) 14:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Asparagusus, I've made further changes to the draft The Clash and Belfast article. In fact, it is a major edit! The changes are in response to your comments about the need for a more formal neutral point of view tone of an encyclopedia article. It would be really good if you got the opportunity to have a look at the redraft. Thanks TDMcr (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Clash and Belfast (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at The Clash instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I see no reason that the pertinent info from this draft cannot be merged into The Clash. Even if I'm wrong, there should be a consensus on that talk page that such a spin-off article is necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Clash and Belfast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv 23:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Clash and Belfast

Hello, TDMcr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Clash and Belfast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]