Jump to content

User talk:TCO/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 7

nomenclature

Like this:[1]?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Good find. That's a useful reference as a cite. But I have hope that one of the other species' original papers would have a quote that I can use, showing the scientist was aware of the myth, probably from Ovid's Metamorphoses.TCO (talk) 15:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I've found that harder to find on the older stuff when I work on reptile articles. Usually it is not in the original literature, you often have to find a contemporary of the scientist or a later commentary that discusses it. I seem to remember running into that with Cyclura nubila, the Cuban Iguana, as nubila can mean "cloudy" or "grey" as in the color, coincidentally, (or maybe not), Gray was the last name of the scientist who first described it(gray/grey iguana or Gray's iguana).--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ

Yeah, a later cite would work as well. Just looking for a quote, for a little more "so what". I asked at project insects and they think the reference may be to a plant that is eaten.TCO (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

RfA Glane23

Hi

I just posted with comments on that very issue, although it was a support in my case. I wondered if you had seen my comment and the links I had put there ? He has created at least one article :¬)

Chaosdruid (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Not enought meat on the bone in that article. Pun intended.  ;) TCO (talk) 22:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Lol - pun liked :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Galapagos tortoise map

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at Fallschirmjäger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fallschirmjäger ✉ 11:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

FAC

Hey TCO, thanks for jumping in and helping out at FAC! I do have a small suggestion, however - super-long review pages tend to deter other reviewers. If you have a long list of concerns, you might consider leaving the complete list on either the review talk or article talk pages, and summarizing your concerns on the main review page while linking to the full review. Just a thought, don't feel you're obligated to do that. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Will start putting the stuff on talk. TCO (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Turtles: Very interesting!

Hi TCO! The article looks very good.

I don't know whether it is worthy of inclusion in the article, near the section on turtles for food, etc., but neuro-physiologists and biological physicists study the neurons of turtles because the fused vertebrae provide greater stability and less noise than do any other animals. (The details of the experiments are unpleasant, however, so much so that I hesitated to share this with you.)

If this would be of interest, I could find you a reference.

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 03:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, please.TCO (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Video player some thoughts

Hi, the point you made about blogs using video for years is true(although it's only been 6 years not 10). Blog with video is in a completely different way to Wikipedia of course. What blogs do it embed a video hosted elsewhere, the most common thing is to embed a video that is hosted on youtube. A video on youtube is not royality free, even if the video is entirely free content as the encryption method is actually owned by someone and in thoery at least royalities are paid. Google stand behind there video with deep pockets so there is no issue. The same doesn't apply to Wikipedia of course where everything is suppose to be free. That being said I'm not entirely sure there is any techincal reason Wikipedia cannot embed a video rather then hosting the content itself, but policy wise youtube videos are not advert free. So that could be the issue. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The state of Oregon had a Youtube embedded video and it played on their site and had no ads or anything. Who cares about the format? I mean the computer has some proprietary parts as well. We can still retain an OGG copy. After all, the video I got was pulled off of Youtube and converted. It's just a mess, that a site with as many hits as this can't play a damned video.TCO (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

On the Oregon site an ad comes up when the video has finished playing. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Well, wiki should just pay for a feed then.TCO (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)  :(

The King and I

Would you be interested in working with me on this? I would say it is about 80 percent done, it needs work in the recordings and later productions section. Sixtieth anniversary of the Broadway premiere is March 29 and it would be cool to have it as TFA. Conom credit is available, and due to my travels I have limited time to work on it.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I will try to help out, but I won't work to a deadline or to conom credit. Sometimes I can, but lately, need to dial it back and just not as much fun to crank. I really like the idea of challenges and deadlines in general. Just right now, need less pressure. 23:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Not a problem. I'd be grateful for whatever help you can give in those areas. And I don't, btw, do stuff like using conom as a goad. I give it, and rarely am I let down.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
I hope to get to Myrrha tonight.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
The King and I project has been dropped; instead Me and Juliet is now at FAC, which will wrap up R&H as far as I am concerned.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll review it man. I'm getting pretty used to them by now.  ;)TCO (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Last one though, will need to train you in coins, Richard Nixon, and postwar Canadian politics!--Wehwalt (talk) 01:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, though, I think you should understudy me on a FAC article, then you will be more relaxed about the process and can do them on your own. One without a deadline is fine, and I know nothing about turtles so will not be much help on that. Any other interests?--Wehwalt (talk) 13:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
I'll collorate with you, some time. I can easily think of topics that would interest you (a book, a film). I should be doing less wiki though and take care of real life.TCO (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Let me know. I've done a film, Borat. Don't think I've done a book.--Wehwalt (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Also, I've had Pierre de Fermat on the mulling over thinking about doing list for a while. Or if that is too stodgy, there was a proposal a while back that I do absinthe with Malleus, but he decided against it.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
those are good. any turtle ideas? how about the Indian myth of the earth being on top of a turtle? we need more GA FAs before 01APR. that's litrary and all
I barely squeaked through biology in high school, how much can you expect from me? Besides, I have no turtle references. I think the Discworld people have the Great A'Tuin thoroughly in hand.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Forget biology, but can you use that rocket-powered mind to figure out something we could slap a Turtle Project sticker on, that would still interest you? That's why I suggested a myth. See here or here. These are much more topics where cultural understanding rather than biological detail is the issue.

We are in a crunch to get 20 points of Turtle Project featured content by 01APR. GA and FL are a point, FA is two. We started with 10 points, added an extra point for Painted turtle promotion. Galapagos tortoise is a GA in FAC now. And then state reptile will go into FL queue in a day or two. But we need at least some more GAs (think that would be the fast path).

Maybe free associate a little and think of something that could be gotten to GA or FA or FL, that would cover interests of both parties. Just do some wild wacky thinking and write a bunch of concepts down on paper and google or wiki search a bit. I bet you come up with something! How about Turtle excluder device? Some legal topic (a treaty or law or regulation)? For instance there is an FDA regulation on turtles no less than 4" for pets (kids have died from salmonella). I feel ya on the sources, but how about just brainstorming first and then culling the ones that are impossible? Some of them may have lots of online stuff (like the FDA reg would)?

Not trying to be pushy and we can do some novel or something some time. But if somehow you could think of a turtle topic, by hook or crook, that would fill an immediate need! And get me motivated to work immediately. (We could do the next one as Fermat or Stover at Yale or whatever, post April Fool's.)TCO (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I think when I look at a topic, what I am thinking about is "can I easily get enough refs to make the article work"? There are articles I'd love to do but it would be difficult to impossible to get hold of enough refs to make it work at the FA level. That's my perspective on a possible article, practical to the last! By the way, Me and Juliet at FAC, could use your attentions, if you have any free time! Whenever I think of turtles and books, I keep coming up with Alice in Wonderland, which I'm not really looking to do.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
I thought of Turtle Back Zoo but that is not really about Turtles, I think my mom took me there as a child. By the way, on Pipe Dream, I find that Cy Feuer had a memoir and I've sent off for it!--Wehwalt (talk) 16:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
By the way, Me and Juliet apparently had a few really good moments, just from the script and from the critics. The sandbag crashing right in front of Jeanie foreshadowed the chandelier in Phantom. The "Keep it Gay" moment when you see the dancers live and then the stage blacks out while the music continues and a very short time later you see them in their sweats, practicing the same number and you realize weeks have passed. And there is a great moment no one comments on late in Act 2, when Mac finds out Betty is available to him again, he accidentally is caught onstage by the curtain, and knows the dance routine so well that he hides behind members of the ensemble until he can sneak into the wings ... it makes you wish for what could have been. By anyone else's standards, R&H's three flops are really good plays, and I'd pay good money to see them.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank You!

The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar
I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition.

It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be presented with a mock up to assess on aesthetic appeal.

Finally, I invite all of you to participate in the featured sounds process itself. Whether you're a performer, an uploader, or just come across a sound file you find top quality, and that meets the featured sound criteria, you can nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. Featured sounds is also looking for people to help assess candidates (also at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates.)

Thanks again for such a strong showing of support, and I hope to see you at featured sounds in the future.
Sven Manguard Wha?
Adam Cuerden (talk)
(X! · talk)

And thank you also for the help with Pipe Dream (musical), just promoted. I don't really do much with barnstars, but thank you for your help. No turtles today, but I was at a shop in Northern California where they had a tank with two iguanas in it ... I will not mention what the shop was selling, but it wasn't the iguanas ...--Wehwalt (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Congrats on the promotion! I don't need a barn star (especially as I did a review, not editing). Your kind welcome though. P.s. I think that turtle FDA thing could use our skillz. The legal component, understanding the history of legislation, recent violations, the loophole, salmonella medical dimension, cute pics of baby turtles. I'm fine with doing it with your methodology and decisions on structure and the like. And if that one does not excite, other ideas (see above)?TCO (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I will think about it, but don't see how these are going to meet. We'll work on it though.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
This one? [[2]] Not very biological...
I don't have any references on it, but let me look at it more.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you have the James Beard cookbook? Or the Joy? Turtle soup? I promise to understudy an FA and do it your way in the future. But if we could rack up some plus signs by 01APR, that would be really killer... TCO (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Not to get off topic, but Wehwalt, are you sure you didn't just imagine the iguanas? That haze over the state of California isn't smog, you know.-RHM22 (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
By the way, TCO, have you ever read through the Joy of Cooking? I love that book. Somewhere there is a section about preparing possum, where they say that you should feed it milk and cereal for something like five days before preparation.-RHM22 (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The Photo Barnstar

The Photographer's Barnstar
For tracking down permission on the Alabama red-bellied turtle image! Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks man. I earned that one. Had seven emails, coupla phone calls, etc. (Of course now we have a bunch of extra ART images!) You can see if you like any better. May be a couple more straggling in later. TCO (talk) 00:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

New image for Pipe Dream

here. Traubel should not have allowed herself to be photographed with mouth open, Johnson looks like he has just been hit with Hazel's baseball bat, and Tyler does not exactly scream "whore" at me, she looks too soulful. Jeez.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

It's a good image.TCO (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Me and Juliet

Thanks for the review. I want to go through Carcharoth's comments first and then will get to yours. Since I unsurprisingly write like a lawyer, I always look carefully at comments about my prose and will go through it carefully. The thing is, there is really not much tension in this plot. I'll go back and work directly from the script, but when there is mystery (will Bob find out about Larry and Jeannie, will he beat them up) it is dispelled rather quickly. I think the idea was that they were saying, "this is just one crisis that happens in the run of a successful show, this his how they deal with it, and then they'll raise the curtain tomorrow night and do it all again." I agree with you, the plot is uninspired, but the end of Act 1, if done well (and from what I've read, it was done well), should be an utter showstopper.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I know it didn't work as a play, but I bet you can make it work in your write-up. :-) I'm nitpicking away at it, just to try to help you (is only way I know). But main thing would be to step back and see if you can make these paras fun to read for the reader. I could care less if RnH wrote a crappy play, I want your article to be fun!  ;-) TCO (talk) 17:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
And please don't be sensitive about your prose ("I'm a lawyer"). Your prose is very nice, sophisticated without wordiness. I just want a little more "pop". Not sure how to do it, but I think it's worth at least thinking about. I would say the same thing if you were doing a Powerpoint at work. It's not a crit, if anything it shows what you are capable of.TCO (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm aware my prose is good for the limited purpose of Wikipedia, but that also shows my writing's limitations. I'm good at characterizing and summarizing stuff. Not so much, when it comes to original creative writing. I'll see about the pop. Did you notice the sandbag at the upper right of the playbill? You can't tell if it is falling or not, but I got a laugh out of it, just sort of naughty.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't notice it. Good eye. There were a couple little things buried in the Pipe Dream image as well. Please make it wider, so we can appreciate image!TCO (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Alluvium

I've added it to wp:WikiProject Geology and flagged it for attention. Right now it fails wp:NOTDICT, but there's loads of sources that could be used to build an excellent article, feel free to dig in (so to speak). "To see the world in a grain of sand, and to see heaven in a wild flower" - Blake LeadSongDog come howl! 17:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Painted turtle native range
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Painted Turtle Distribution alternate.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

The Guidance Barnstar
Thanks for all your help and effort on making the map and getting it to featured status! Wouldn't have been possible without your collaboration. Cheers, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 11:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Aw, thanks! I'm so behaved now.TCO (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Motto?

Hey man, haven't talked in a while-but I just saw a (now-struck) comment you made on a talk page and wanted to thank you for the much needed laugh. Seriously, we need to make that the Wikipedia motto or something. Qrsdogg (talk) 03:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for putting up with me, man. Hope you are doing well. You make me smile when you say nice things! TCO (talk) 03:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Things are going well, I brought something to GA last month and I'm working on another one now. But I have to keep holding back whenever I read through some of the more ridiculous discussion, so it's always fun to see someone tell it like it is. Qrsdogg (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
You are a good guy. I will try to keep a smile and a sense of perspective as well.TCO (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

Hi TCO, I apologise for removing the map from the F and A discussion page; I'm fearful that every week will now see full-size postings of FPs we didn't display on the page. The design of the page is partly premised on the idea of rationing the displays to avoid cramming and text squashing, and to focus readers on the amount of featured content we believe they are likely to absorb in one visit. The pic locations also have to compromise between narrow and wide windows. Tony (talk) 14:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC) PS I toyed with putting the map at the bottom (it has to be displayed large). Tony (talk) 14:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

No sweat, man! You did right.
I did wonder about the other two pictures that were missing. Seems like we have a lot of pics on that page, like for the sounds and all, and showing the FPs as images vice text just seems like more appropriate.
But, if you're really feeling guilty, state reptile could use a review from a heavy like you..  ;-) TCO (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
You might also be interested in the concept of this FP nom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/subspecies_of_painted_turtles). TCO (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry

I think Fetchcomm's view is too limited on file mover. I see no harm in giving trusted users all the userrights they could possibly need. Nothing one of us does, is irreversible. We are all writing in the sand.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

State reptiles

Would you mind moving or copying the comments you made on the talk page to the FLC, where everyone can see them? I'd rather not have editors searching on someone's talk page to find my responses on comments, since I am a director. It's important for me to be transparent. Speaking of transparency, I am undecided on whether to offer support at the end of the comment process, because I'd be disqualifying myself from closing the FLC down the road. Anyway, if the comments are moved/copied to the FLC, I'll respond there. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

ಠ_ಠ

I saw this and thought of you Parrot of Doom 22:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Everyone is thinkin of me...just remember me when I am re-permabanned. I had a person who remembered me from basically ripping the entire Gymternet inside out from the butthole, say that he missed me. But this is the Intertubes. We are all writing in the sand per Wehwalt. Not me...I want to tatoo my message on people's buttocks.TCO (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
You know you've made it when your amateur philosophy gets quoted.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Savage

TCO, you sir are a SA-VAGE!!! State Reptiles is (pardon my childness) "gaawjuss!" Seriously, you made that page. Go you! Hope it gets promoted, sure deserves it!  :-) --NYMFan69-86 (talk) 03:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks man. Needed that. Saw you ripping into Galapagos. Good man. TCO (talk) 03:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
That list is superb...it truly couldn't be any better (just like picta, which you ravaged through also!). I fixed one ref that had many citations (and many problems)...that should hold off the FAC archive and give Mike Searson a chance to keep working his magic. Seriously, who is that guy!? He's awesome.  :-) And so are you!--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 04:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Turtles have TCO-like backbone

Hi TCO!

I wanted to follow up on a promised reference to turtles and neurology. The fused spinal-column reduces the noise for scientists studying spinal nerves. Here are recent papers by some Danish acquaintances of mine, which are published in the best journals:

  • R. W. Berg, A. Alaburda and J. Hounsgaard "Balanced inhibition and excitation drives spike activity in spinal half-centers" Science, vol. 315(5810) 390-393, 2007 (pdf). This publication has Supporting online material (pdf), a perspective written by William B. Kristan (pdf) and includes a cover illustration- About the cover
  • R. W. Berg, S. Ditlevsen and J. Hounsgaard "Intense synaptic activity enhances temporal resolution spinal motoneurons" PLoS ONE3(9): e3218, 2008. (pdf). Supplementary material (pdf). Faculty of 1000 rating: "Must read" .

You can find the pdf files at Rune Berg's web-page.

As I noted before, I regret that such experiments cause discomfort. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 15:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Would slide this into some general discussion of the anatomy, as an aside. Or maybe within a discussion of uses of turtles, (they are often disssection specimens as well). I think in the general turtle article. thanks again.

Magda and Lenka

I saw this and just had to refer it to you, I thought you'd like it! Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. By chance, I had just come across an outfit a couple days ago that actually sells these Siamese twin type turtles (or sells turtles in general and had a few pics of the phenomenon). This is the sort of quirky page that Qrrsdog or Mbz could start. I get the impression it is a general type thing and I'm sure there are papers on the happening. Plus, the article would have great images! TCO (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Whoa, that's some kind of turtle there-not what I was expecting. That would be an interesting article, for sure. It would be cool if that happened to a huge tortoise. Qrsdogg (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Reptiles

Hard for me to help. I noticed the word "pride" in the first sentence which sounded like pov to me. I was about to axe or tag it when it dawned on me, mercifully, that the article was "featured list," whatever that means. Something short of FA, apparently. But something editors had to work hard to get. I don't want to rain on anyone's parade. I don't mind axing articles that are "C" rated, but like to stay out of the way of editors when they are creating a masterpiece. I'm not sure I can be of help. Thanks for asking. Student7 (talk) 12:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I think it's a reasonable summary of the quotes and all...but it's changed anyhow.TCO (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Stupid reptile family

Oh dear, LOL.[3] I guess I deserved that for calling the little fish, or anybody whatsoever who isn't me, incompetent.[4] Bishonen | talk 00:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC).

GMTA. I already teased you for it. TCO (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: U.S. state reptiles FLC

I don't think I'm the best person to review the U.S. state reptiles list because I am primarily a film editor, I have only done that Latter Days FAR and a GAN review for another film, and I also have very little experience working with lists. It would be hard for me to review it as, unlike film articles, I'm not familiar with what a Featured version of the list should look like. That said, I can still provide some feedback:

  • Remove the boldface in the first sentence. Bolding is not compulsory and in awkward cases like this, it is better not to bold. (See WP:BOLDTITLE and WP:SBE)
Those are good essays and I heart the idea of using common sense and appropriateness, not just taking a wiki-hammer and banging nails. (For instance, if you know how to use them properly, occasional one-sentence paras are appropriate.) That said, I think bold reads fine and "state reptile" is really the key concept. Most of the articles where we link back use that term and it is the most common within the article. Feel good with bolding it.
  • The wikilink for "reptile" and "turtle" should be moved to the first appearance of the word.
I moved the turtle link to the lead, although I'm ambivalent about having that link in the lead (like to keep some blue out at times for easier reading and it is not a difficult concept). Left reptile where it is, so as not to clash with the bolding. Is fine a sentence later.
  • "In Pennsylvania in 2009, the House passed" → "In 2009, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed"
I want to keep parallel structure, with the sentence before (in Minnesota, blabla. Then in Pennsylvania, blabla. Virginia proponents blabla) It's the state that is the key for the series of examples, thus leading with that and the year is secondary detail.
  • "In 1969 Oklahoma designated" → "In 1969, Oklahoma designated"
Put in. Could swear I had that in there before and someone else took it out saying I was overcommaing.
  • "As of January, 2011, twenty-six" → "As of January 2011, twenty-six"
fixed.
  • There's that short one sentence paragraph in the History. I would just merged it with the next paragraph.
Disagree. The general Wiki guidance on short paras is geared to writers that can't write unified structures. A short para uses properly for transition or as a header is legit. Mashing on overview sentence into a single para of three, would be bad org. In any case, think you will like it better now that it is directly under a header.
  • In several of the citation accessdates: "March 06, 2011" → "March 6, 2011"
Fixed now. Reference format has changed (we had year, month, day, all numeric).

Good luck with the FLC. - Kollision (talk) 11:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Implemented or replied to all. Thank you for the careful go-over!TCO (talk) 08:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

HMS Beagle 1832 image

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at Fallschirmjäger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fallschirmjäger ✉ 22:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Great to hear

Great to hear that list got promoted. With the new changes to the Main page to allow lists to be featured maybe well see that one on there at some point in the future. --Kumioko (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

As the Greek bomb-throwers say..."boom, boom, shake the room!"  :-) Yeah...I hope to see it too. Even added a little more American history today. Feel free to look at it and tweak it. "Don't tread on me!" TCO (talk) 01:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Add it to your scrapbook

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
TCO, what can I say? You took a nothing list and made it shine. You truly are a "tireless contributer;" there's no two ways about it. You may now drink you champaign.  :-) NYMFan69-86 (talk) 01:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks man. I really respect getting the hardware from you and look forward to earning it! This is going on the I love me wall!TCO (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

You're very welcome! A lot of people love you, you are a very important and valued wikipedian. And your userspace is pretty. Hehe...--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I had an admiral uncle who I teased about the "I love me wall" and he said, "the older you get the more you love yourself" and then mentioned that he didn't have a wall, but a room and a half of memorablia. Anyhoo..it's all good. P.s. I am no kidding in email contact with Hobart Smith (most famoust US herp and 99 yo) regarding a followup to his 1939 expedition. Let it bang around inside your head, Spanish minor...;-) TCO (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Haha, will do. Someone has to find out their distribution down there near the Rio Grande. Just how far into Mexico can one still find them? It's like the only thing that nobody's nailed down about this animal! [I believe your uncle, the older you are the more you love yourself....that makes a lot of sense to me]  :-) --NYMFan69-86 (talk) 02:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

Back

I hereby, with no authority whatsoever, give you back your testicles ;-) It's hard to imagine Will BeBack being that assertive, but I know of at least one unnamed admin who would eat them fer shure! Put them in a safe place, HAH!
This user boldly assumes consensus when editing Wikipedia until told otherwise.
— DocOfSoc • Talk • 21:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship#Valfontis

You seem to have opposed the candidate two days after supporting them; both a support and oppose !vote are listed! You may want to strike or indent one of the comments. Regards, Swarm X 23:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm not seeing it. Are you comparing two candidates? Or a different one?TCO (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Facepalm Facepalm. I am an idiot. Just forget I said anything. Swarm X 02:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Admit it. You are hot for me.TCO (talk) 02:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, TCO, but it can never be. My heart belongs to this woman. Swarm X 07:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I will let you have the last tease, old bean.TCO (talk) 07:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Myrrha

Domenico Alaleona "Intermezzo per pianoforte dall'Opera Mirra". Look it up. It has the advantage of being, not a mere piano reduction, but a recognised performance piece. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

That will work great! Do you have a file, or will you play and make a recording?TCO (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Spelling

(talk page stalker) The correct Latin is 'Mea maxima culpa'. ( Catholic school ;-) I have refrained from correcting the spelling of Champagne above. It was very difficult for me! Are you smiling yet? :-D Namaste — DocOfSoc • Talk • 02:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

You should have seen how long it took to get me to spell capisce. (There's this joke about the farmer being criticized for saying dung instead of fertilizer by some gentle lady, and he says, should see how long it took to get me to say dung.)TCO (talk) 03:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

LOVE it! ROFL, will probably "Borrow" it! — DocOfSoc • Talk • 03:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

— DocOfSoc • Talk • 21:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Automatic spellcheck is destroying my spelling abilities.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

If I am going to keep composing content here, I need to get some fancier interface and learn how to use addons and stuff. Or Sue needs to fix the clunky edit screen. I am so much faster on MS Word (including making endnotes and the like) it is not even funny.TCO (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Myrrha more

Tell you what, get me a score for the Intermezzo pointed out, and I'll make a MIDI. It may not be FS-level, but it'll be better than nothing. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

  • I tried Google searches but could not find the music. Although there is a 2003 performance on CD: [5]. Ideas? I am not an expert on finding sheet music. I couldn't even find a copy to buy.TCO (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Did you try amazon and bn.com? That's where I go.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I just went there now and tried to search for some combinations like intermezzo, mirra, sheet music, Alaleona, etc. Didn't get anything. There was one 1932 thing from Amazon that was related to Mirra, but it said not available. Can you explain better how to search those sites? I did not see a special section for sheet music (seemed to be within books).TCO (talk) 21:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Mirra Intermezzo is a beautiful piece and got a lot of accolades. We do have the sheet music for Sousa though (from LOC).TCO (talk) 21:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I think it is more likely to be a published score than sheet music. While I rarely look for sheet music (I don't play or read music), I'd imagine them to come up on Amazon like any other publication. Have you searched google books? Not expecting a preview, but it might lead you to a sales source that had it.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

1. All I got was the CD and the 1932 unavailable thingie on Amazon: [6].

2. Here is Google books: [7] Can you tell if any of them have the notes? (even with no view?) They all look like discussion to me.

3. Here is Barnes and Noble: [8]. By the way, the search window there is a lot less friendly than Amazon (seems like you need exact matches, order disqualifies things, Boolian not working, etc.)

You need to use google books, then click on an entry, and in a box in the upper right, there will be links like amazon and bn and albris, which may or may not have them but are at least listing them. books.google.com.

4. I did a bunch of other (not shown) Google web, Amazon and BN searches. I'm not a "jock" at searching, but my Google-fu was not pulling it up.

5. Could you take a look please? Maybe there are some tricks for looking for music that I don't know.

I didn't see anything obvious. But why not ask at the Opera WikiProject? People have collections of stuff, you might get lucky.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I've searched enough, man. I'm probably not that good at searching for music really, given my aculturedness. I think it is inefficient for me to go after it more and not worth the gain. If someone else can track it down for Adam's MIDI great. If Adam will do a MIDI of the Sousa composition (we have that sheet music) great. I will also ask the guy with the MIDI file if he will just donate it. If none of that works, I'll go without.

Exactly. We none of us have unlimited time and energy. But slow but steady wins the race, as they say about ... about ... hey, how about those Yankees?--Wehwalt (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
According toWorldcat, the British Library has a copy. A check - I hope this works - shows that this is correct. I believe the British Library has a Wikipedian in Residence? Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I asked Fae for help [9]. I should have tried Worldcat. Any trick to looking for music there?TCO (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Just do a regular search. Of course, I don't know how helpful the British Library are. My one experience with trying to get stuff from them was so much of a headache that I gave up - but that was several years ago. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

You're much more drawn to the Mirra piece aren't you? (Sousa sheet music is online.) Let's give Fae a chance. Maybe he can go photocopy it and send you the sheets in the post or scan them or whatever. (Do we put sheet music in Commons or WP images btw?) Or at least he will have a contact who can.TCO (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, the thing is the Sousa piece is going to be second-rate because it's a mere piano reduction of a work conceived and intended as a military band work - and such reductions tend to be a little dull. The Mirra piece doesn't lose anything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, let's do Mirra. Fae will get the music or tell us how.TCO (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, it'sd out of copyright here in Europe. The U.S. status is a bit unclear. 86.179.220.254 (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Refactor

Hi TCO, just a heads up that I moved your Q over to the Media Copyright Questions noticeboard. The other page was for existing copyvio issues - hope that's what you where looking for. The Interior (Talk) 02:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks man, perfect! TCO (talk) 03:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
If you don't get an answer there, Commons licensing is another place to try. The Interior (Talk) 03:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

I asked at the Commons Pump. Good enough?TCO (talk) 03:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Only time will tell! good luck with the recording project. The Interior (Talk) 04:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Using dashes script

Hi. I noticed you asked help. I answered here, you can ask again if you didn't understand. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

VanVoice

Hi TCO, in response to your recent comments -- it's not clear whether or not you noticed this, but the editor whose conduct you were questioning made his edits years before being hired by the Wikimedia Foundation. And by the time he was hired, the newspaper had been sold. Maybe you already picked up on all of that, if so just ignore this :) -Pete (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know that and it is a good point.TCO (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll cut my evil threadjacking. It was fun while it lasted...TCO (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
:) -Pete (talk)

i got in trouble once when I didn't start a new thread

(talk page stalker) I figgered out that your TCO stands for Too Cool! ;-) — DocOfSoc • Talk • 21:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

RfA

I hope you don't mind that I badger you a lot at RfAs. You strike me as the sort of editor who enjoys a spirited debate, but if the badgering annoys you, let me know and I'll stop. 28bytes (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I think he's taking a wikibreak.--Wehwalt (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back

Is everything well with you?--Wehwalt (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

There is no Wiki drama. I should really concentrate on some off Wiki stuff for a while. You should ban me.TCO (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
We don't do bans to enforce wikibreaks, see WP:BLOCK.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Understood.TCO (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry if I thought there was drama, your request came rather out of the blue. Each of us learns how to balance Wiki and real life obligations.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
See you in May, big guy.  ;) TCO (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll save you some turtle soup.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Hi TCO, if for some reason you don't want to use the Wikibreak Enforcer (which works well if you don't know anything about javascript but is fairly useless if you do) I'll block you for whatever period of time you'd like, with or without talk page access. Only you have to promise to come back when it expires - I rely on the fact that someone I once unblocked actually creates content as a way to justify my usefulness as an admin, and my self image as an "honorary" content-creator-by-proxy. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I love you FQ. Put me on strictest possible probation until May.71.246.150.247 (talk) 18:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm. Traditionally, FQ is User:FisherQueen, but I'll assume you're talking about me, and take that as a compliment. Blocking with talk page access removed, until 00:01 UTC 1 May 2011. Good luck with whatever you have brewing in real life. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Look forward to you coming back TCO, you do excellent work. Take care. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I second that. Hope you are able to take some time to enjoy the spring weather. Qrsdogg (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Galapagos tortoise promotion

Thank you for everything you've done for this article, you have been a saint! I've really appreciated your kind words and encouragement, too, and look forward to working with you again! Minglex (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

Thank you

Thank you for the time and effort you put into reviewing List of longest rivers of the United States (by main stem), which was promoted to Featured List yesterday. I do a lot of reviewing myself, and I know how the process can be uneasy from the reviewer's side as well as the nominator's. I regret losing my temper, and I hope there are no hard feelings. Your advice led to modifications that improved the article, and I appreciate that. My best. Finetooth (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Talkback

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at Fæ's talk page.
Message added 15:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

Sandbox issue

I want to let you know that one of your sandboxes has been deleted. It shows up in the top 5 google-hits when searching that person's name, despite its being in extremely early draft status, and there is nothing in the draft as it currently stands that explicitly asserts notability. It doesn't help that the subject is also a minor, and generally speaking biographical articles of borderline notable minors aren't widely supported. If and when you're ready to really work on this article including filling it out and clearly establishing notability, you can ask an administrator to undelete it; however, I will ask that you add the NO_INDEX template to the page while it is under development. Best, Risker (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

TCO's on wikibreak for another month.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive

The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive.

Awards and barnstars
A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page.

We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Talkback

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at La Pianista's talk page.
Message added 04:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

Jewish MOH list

Thanks for taking the time to comment. I am going to work on those issues in a couple days. I need to update some things with WPUS, the Newsletter and the Collaboration and then after that I will work on the list again. --Kumioko (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Fluxes in metallurgy

The flux (metallurgy) article was MOSTLY about fluxes as used in metal-joining, but that's just due to imbalance in this article, not a wrong meaning. The article does mention the many perfectly legitimate uses of fluxes as flowing agents (and also purifying agents and additives) in smelting-- it just didn't do that in the LEDE (now fixed). It just needed/needss some work to mention these up front (done), and expand the extractive section below (not yet done). After all, smelting is where the world flux entered metallurgy, and it hasn't ever left that use just because the hobbyist knows it better from solders, etc.

Thanks for your other work on fluorine. I think, BTW, that fluoride ions really do decrease the melting point in slags in much the same way they decrease viscosity in most fluorinated materials (by disrupting certain ionic interactions) but I haven't been able to find a good reference for this. However, fluorine's use in industry is probably more "all of one peice" than is realized by many chemists, and this disruption of stickiness gives the element its name also, very fittingly. SBHarris 20:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Looks better now. The whole thing is a little muddled, but that is just the state of our wiki-articles and the use of the word flux having so many different uses. I am NOT a smelting expert. But am used to seeing chlorides (and fluorides) used to dramatically reduce the melting (and boiling) point of metal oxides (and an ore is usually a metal oxide). Then again, it wasn't clear to me if the CaF2 is used to reduce melting points or if it's more about having Ca combine with the slags (they talk about lime as well...and that is really just a source of Ca, I guess). I donno...
In terms of mechanisms, there might be some vague connection of melting aids and slippery surfaces, but I would beware of making that analogy. I think of it more as the overall system thermodynamically having a lowered eutectic or some such. and the physical reason probably has to do with the F- help breaking up the network of metal and oxide. O2- and F- are actually very similar in size and behavior. And the structures like CaF2 are also seen in materials like UrO2. I donno though...TCO (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I had most of your same thoughts. Undoubtedly Ca is useful by itself to get rid of phosphorus, and Cl salts do lower the temp by eutectic mechanisms. But on the other hand, the steel industry is STILL a big user of CaF2, when they could be using cheaper salts, so there's something funny going on that NEEDS F. In particular, fluorosilicates are busted up silicates, which are otherwise very hard and very difficult to melt. Perhaps some of that goes on in iron smelting. One place I do know there is analogy between low-melting fluorocarbons, SF6, WF6, UF6 and so on, IS in the formation of cryolite in the aluminum smelting industry. AlF63+ is just "slippery" and the salt melts far more easily than any other aluminum salt. SBHarris 20:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I think it's a melting aid. Like a solvent almost. (That is what Meiers calls it.) That is more important than impurity removal (after all lime can be used for that and is). It is about the Fl ions and CaF2 is just the cheapest source of them. Adding halides into oxides reduces their melting points because the space-filling structure gets all messed up with different anions in there. Fe2O3 had one melting point on its own, and then a lower one with CaF2 there as well. It really is the same thing going on as when you do metal oxide crystal growth and use a "flux" to lower the melting point of the compound. Fe2O3 is a metal oxide is a "ceramic". Think this is kinda different (other than name) than using a resin for protecting the surface of a metal that you are welding or soldering. I really don't care to straighten out all the uses of the word flux and articles on them though...TCO (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
See the wiki article on eutectics (in general mixing more crap together lowers the mp of each). Also, here is a google search on oxide fluoride ceramic eutectic: http://www.google.com/search?q=eutectic+ceramics&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=&rlz=1I7ADFA_en#sclient=psy&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADFA_en&source=hp&q=eutectic+ceramic+oxide+fluoride&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=54a2aeb3c013e455&biw=1259&bih=594 TCO (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Sandbox restored

Apologies for the delay in responding; I've been a little over-busy lately and your sensible request got lost in the more heated commentary on my talk page. I have now restored User:TCO/Sandbox/Lexie Priessman and put a noindex template on it. Risker (talk) 17:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks man. I will build it up. She won an NBC nationally televised meet (the Nastia cup, I guess I can cite the TV program or some local newspaper or IG). Also is now on the US National Team (USAG website sources.) Was a member of the elite team that won an international meet over the Russians and Italians (Jesolo).TCO (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Or I could stop content work and just start some random flame wars if you want. (TCO know trolling.) You'd have to repermaban me and then FQ will look bad, for being a liberal, though.  ;) TCO (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Well, we can't have FQ looking bad, can we? So I'm glad I've opened the door to your further content contributions. Much more satisfying than flame wars, anyway.  ;-) Risker (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey man

I just saw you are back in action again. Good to see, we don't have too many editors like you around here. I've just gotten back to working on another strange American state fair contest: Combine demolition derby. It's one of the 5 manliest hobbies, it turns out. Qrsdogg (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

You are a cool guy. Thanks for putting up with the alligator snapping turtle, while not being one yourself. I notice you have been getting all kinds of GAs and DYKs done. Mega-props!TCO (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I got to work with Malleus on one of the GA's. He was very merciful towards me, considering my terrible prose :) Qrsdogg (talk) 15:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

resource request

Hi TCO,

I've responded to your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. You can find links to the two articles you requested at that page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Here.

Got it done before I left; you may as well have it. [10]. Don't expect me to do anything more with it, though. 86.177.225.166 (talk) 22:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Um do you release your special creation and all that happy horseshit?TCO (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
CC license in Lower righthand corner of the page. 86.176.72.221 (talk) 11:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Very thoughtful. Thank you for the work involved. I will get it onto Commons. Please leave it up on the site for a little while. At least until I get someone to verify that page had the licence and all.TCO (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Remember TCO?

Yes, I remember you Sock. 8)

1. Your Welcome

2. No

3. I am only able to access the internet for 2 hours a day, two or three times a week, so I might only have a few edits per week or even month.

Thanks for the inquiry though. Good to here occasionally from wiki friends :)--intelatitalk 23:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Email

TCO, could you either enable Special:EmailUser/TCO in your preferences, or send me an email at (email address no longer needed, overly worried about spam so removing -floq)? --Floquenbeam (talk) 10:38, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Sent you an email. Not sure how to enable Wiki-email (like private messages?)TCO (talk) 11:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If you go to Special:Preferences, to the email options section at the bottom of the 1st page, you can enter an email address. There's also a check box enable email from other users. If you check it, then an "email this user" link appears on the left toolbar when someone visits your talk page, and they can send you an email. Got your email, and replied, but we can probably stop pinging each other here every time we send one I guess. --Floquenbeam (talk) 12:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Advice

If you don't say silly things in the first place, you won't need to apologize. ;) I'm still not entirely sure of your original intent in posting to my talk page (some sort of disgruntled reply to this?), but okay. I don't believe we've had contact before that. Apology accepted, however, so no need to comment further. María (habla conmigo) 12:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I didn't transclude in the end, but the proposal itself can be seen at Talk:Main Page#Formal proposal to put Featured Lists on the main page from 13 June. Regards, —WFC— 16:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

I wanted to be first.  :( TCO (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

RFA

Thanks for helping me with the template. It did not seem to like that I had a username change.--v/r - TP 22:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

No prob. Make sure you fix that Soxbot thing. I have no idea what it is. If you don't either, then find someone who does and get help by advice or just having them do it. Part of this whole gig is interaction and leadership and looking things up. r/ TCO (talk) 22:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Seems to be fixed; either something you did or I did not sure. It's now listed on the discussion page appropriately. Either way good, because I didn't know either. I was copying 28bytes RFA the same way you were. I'm actually heading out right now with the wife, so I'm glad it got sorted and I won't be seen as abandoning it while I'm gone tonight.--v/r - TP 22:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, TCO. You have new messages at MC10's talk page.
Message added 02:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—mc10 (t/c) 02:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Turtle question

Are there any species of turtle that make any cool sounds? --Guerillero | My Talk 01:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't know. TCO (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
If there is one. It could be a FS--Guerillero | My Talk 19:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
What is the best way to search for free sound media?TCO (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc7UbPwhRI8 TCO (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Indentation on talk pages

Why are you indenting different paragraphs of the same post by different amounts, as you did here and here? It makes it really hard to figure out who wrote e.g. the first paragraph of the older post without looking at the page history. ― A. di M.​plé​dréachtaí 16:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I donno. I guess I felt like I was seguing off myself. I can write them one after another, though, sorry. This whole system sucks though. Every other forum I frequent, you don't have to manually sign, only moderators can edit your posts, don't have to do the colons crap.
But OK. I will try to keep things at same level of heirarchy when I am the one talking.TCO (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

U.S. state reptiles

Looking at conservation status column what do you think? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 12:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

My first thought was resistance as the lettering seems so smalland it looks busy. But looking back at SR, we do have a lot of space to fill, because of the darned pictures. And maybe a graphical presentation would be nice (eye can scan the table and see where the circles are, left or right). If you want to try it out, go ahead. Will leave it, if you do the work...TCO (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
P.s. I think a lot of those lemur species are really subspecies...but don't get me going. Taxonomy is for arguing! TCO (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Actually I need to give the guy respect, when you realize there are 250 refs there, he shows the extinct stuff, and then he shows 3 possible arrangements of the genuses. TCO (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Spare the rod

I thought it was tongue-in-cheek, and it brought about a chuckle. :)
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 21:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk page watchers

Following up on a question you asked at the help desk, while the privacy rules prevent you form knowing exactly who is watching your talk page, you can make some reasonable guesses. For example, I turned on the option that adds every page I edit to my watch list. Not everyone does this, and even those that do can turn off watching manually, but many will be lazy and just leave it on. So the very act of my posting this adds one more editor watching your page, naming me. This information may not help a lot, if you are interested in knowing if someone is watching you and not commenting on your page, but I would guess that a fair proportion of the 43 editors watching you are in this list of editors who have commented at your talk page.--SPhilbrickT 21:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Sign in. Chop, chop. TCO (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

National anthems

How do you think this would look as a layout?

Nation National anthem Date adopted Lyrics writer Music writer Audio
 Afghanistan "Milli Tharana" ("National Anthem") 2006 Abdul Bari Jahani Babrak Wassa noicon Milli Tharana

—WFC— 11:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Looks slick and you are making a big upgrade getting those sounds in there. I like seeing things take off. I dropping one into Myrrha for the first time and learned a little about using the template. (I had a MIDI file so had to use a different template than normal.) Sounds in general can be a another tool in the bag of tricks!TCO (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Glad you agree. Once the sounds are in there, this will be on its way to being among the "best of the best": the sort of stuff we should be falling over ourselves to get on the main page. —WFC— 11:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Agree. That is a really a beautiful compilation of content, when you realize how many minutes of music are together on the page and how easy to navigate. Even how fun to play a little bit of one file then try another. Almost like opening those little doors on the Christmas calander.

P.s. Could you fix videos on this website?  ;) TCO (talk) 11:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Wish I could! —WFC— 12:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
I love the layout --Guerillero | My Talk 02:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 08:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

See my talk page for a link to the right Signpost Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days and ends on June 30, 23:59 UTC. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! There is also a referendum to appoint a Coordinator Emeritus. Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

A330 FA nom comments

I don't see why you removed your comments so quickly. I was trying to take care of comments from Nikkimaria and then SandyGeorgia at the time. The A340 is so closely tied to the A330 that it should be mentioned in the Lead. Tonne is the UK/International term for 1,000 kg, and that's the spelling version used in this article. I did copy editing based on your comments mentioned on the review talk page later. Thanks for the comments. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

1. I KNOW it tonne means metric ton, just that the latter term is easier and more common. (no biggie).

2. WRT to th 340, I was getting that as I went into the article. Just tell me up front with a topic sentence and it will take care of the confusion. Or this would be a great place for a chronology or flow diagram (what led to what). IOW a non-photo image.

3. I cut it because it is a lot of work to deeply parse an article (I was starting to really get into it). Not only for nits, but also for content and flow and such. And Sandy said she doesn't like long reviews. So SHE can track down whoever does what she wants (and no bitching about not enough of them). I am cool with you. It has a huge amount of good content and in places reads very professionally. Think a tiny bit could be done to make it less of a detail glaze (topic sentences), but net-net good stuff. Much better than the norm.TCO (talk) 19:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Sp33dyphil wrote/rewrote much of the article earlier this year and nominated it. I am just trying to fix what all I can in it. But time is running out on this review. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Good luck, man. I feel for ya. TCO (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dichapetalum cymosum

Glad to see you came right with the Gifblaar. Did you get the images from the Russian or somebody else? --User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Christa Botha (see file view in Commons) came through. The Russian did not reply. I love the idea of a drawing, also, but I strongly syuspect that is a photo of a copyrighted image from a book.TCO (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Good work on the article, btw. I was thinking about trying to push someone to get that whipped into GA shape. Main thing is find a couple RSes and start doing cites. (I don't want any credit...or work...just to push someone.)TCO (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Well, I am going to make this article one of my main focusses then. I have never helped in getting an article to attain featured status. This will therefore be a useful exercise in understanding just how that works. But you are right, citations are the most important thing atm. I just wish there were a .pdf versions of the books in the Further reading section so that I could add specific references to claims made in the article. Are there any? Nevertheless, I am all for helping you out here and am glad to be working with you. Good hunting! --User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't know about /pdf. but in the US, there is this thing called ILL (google it) and it works very well...and very few people known of it. I understand it works in many other countries. Maybe even in Africa. Waht it means is that you can almost treat your LOCAL PUBLIC LIBRARY like the Worldcat. just ask the librarian for an ILL form. She may look a little googliey at you...but stand your ground. then fill out the card. And you can get references shipped from ALL OVER. P.s. If it still doesn't work, I will get my ass in gear and help from the US, where we have more books than Africa. (kidding...don't hurt me...had a huge Afrikaans rugby player for a flatmate.) TCO (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Turtle coins

There's an article on Turtles on coins in this month's Coin World. If you send me an email, I'll send you screenshots.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Ok, give me a sec. (I don't think I can use the images, but the article would be good resource, if readable after you scan it.)TCO (talk) 17:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Gah. How do I email you? What is your address?TCO (talk) 18:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
There should be a "email this user" link on the left hand column on my user or talk page.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk back

Hello, TCO. You have new messages at DiscipleOfKnowledge's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

aargh...damnit. Stop talking back a me.  :)

You are going to rock this plant article. I am going to sit and watch and cheer you on! git 'em babeee!!!!!TCO (talk) 22:17, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your zeal is commendable

The Original Barnstar
Your zeal is commendable.  – Ling.Nut 02:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
This is nothing man. FAs make me horny! (But I said I would behave so, will.)TCO (talk) 02:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
To me, it is not original. Is c.1998 trolling.  :( TCO (talk) 02:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

RfA

I feel nervous opposing while you, NW, NYB (last time) support. how close are you to "metaphysical certitude" (on The McLaughlin Group's scale)?  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Brad supports lightweights all the time. I routinely disagree with him. So don't let that bother you. As far as me, I just saw he had done a few GAs and writing something is my big bugaboo. I didn't really look at anything else. Pretty low on the certainty scale. I don't know how NW votes.TCO (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

RFC on a subpage structure for the Manual of Style

Hi TCO.

As someone who contributed to discussion when the issue was raised a little while ago, you may like to have your say in the current RFC on subpages, at WT:MOS.

NoeticaTea? 05:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Just go to your preferences, look for the Signature box and put what you like there. I have the below wikitext in my box [[user:mav|mav]] ([[User:Mav/Reviews|reviews needed]]) --mav (reviews needed) 22:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TCO/Archive_3&oldid=1144607330"