User talk:T3fg72zp

Controversial Article

Hi there,

I'm hoping to be able to answer any questions you may have here instead of on the teahouse!

If you could direct me to any of the following so I could do my best to help: a), d). Best, Luke Elaine Burke (talk) 02:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just logged in to Wikipedia and saw another established editor has already removed that sentence while fact checking the entire article. So I think there is no reason for me to be at Wikipedia anymore. T3fg72zp (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Tenryuu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Mediation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tenryuu. I have put my reply message on your talk page. T3fg72zp (talk).

Legal issues

Further to my reply to you at The Teahouse, I am leaving this here to be sure you are aware of WP:No legal threats.

Also, the nature of your question gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:T3fg72zp. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=T3fg72zp|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]