User talk:Synoman Barris/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Synoman Barris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Get a smart idea, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Get a smart idea! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Genneya Walton has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Neil Sabatino (May 31)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neil Sabatino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neil Sabatino, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Help
Please help me to my Wikipedia Articles Ayushjioff (talk) 08:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Ayushjioff: Sorry, but I am a new user. Secondly, I don’t think your article is notable or encyclopedic. I don’t know how to help. Maybe you can ask an experienced user. Thanks for trusting me Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 08:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Why are you covering George Floyd?
Why are you covering George Floyd? People should know the truth. You hiding it and deleting it. That's stupid and unfair. He was an adult movie actor.
https://iharare.com/george-floyd-was-a-porn-star/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUVtrcXt2vo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maksimiuk (talk • contribs) 11:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Maksimiuk: The edits are not supported by Reliable sources. Some of the sources you have added here are gossip websites and are not reliable. When editing BLP articles there is a certain protocol that is followed and adding controversial sensitive information about BLP without reliable sources is not allowed. Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 11:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
@tell me about it I should add links to "xxx" websites with videos? As a reliable source of information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maksimiuk (talk • contribs) 12:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Maksimiuk: Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia’s policy on reliable sources Here Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 13:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
@Got a Smart Idea tell me about it First of all, George Floyd is already dead. So rules about "living persons" don't apply to this page. Second, "iHarare Media" is Zimbabwe's newspaper - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_of_Zimbabwe . Your actions are clearly - against African people. Shame on you. You think, that you fighting for "black lives matter"? Look at a mirror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maksimiuk (talk • contribs) 15:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Maksimiuk: I have closed the discussion at the tea house, let someone solve the issue many thanks Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 17:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Usage of 4 and 4im warnings
Hello!
Just a heads-up: You actually don't need to add a 4im warning after a level 4 warning. The 4im warnings are used as a first and only warning (See UWLEVELS).
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. - Flori4nKT A L K 22:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Flori4nK: Noted, actually I have spent my whole evening reverting IP vandalism until I got confused. Thank You Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 22:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Invitation to RedWarn
Hello, Get a smart idea! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
- Easy to use - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times.
- Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks.
- Making life easier on the battlefield - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted.
- Rollback previews - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left.
- Always the latest revision - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors.
- Fast - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template.
- Built on your feedback - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say!
- and many more features ...but I don't want to fill your userpage.
RedWarn is currently in use by over 35 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 18:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Blanking
I can clear my own page. Please stop reverting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.214.15.31 (talk) 11:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Why are you blanking warnings on your talk pages. Please see Wikipedia:Removing warnings Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 11:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Because I have read them already. It's like an inbox, once it's read, you delete or archive the message. 188.214.15.31 (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Get a smart idea. The actual guideline is WP:BLANKING. Please be patient while I take a look at your request. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- zzuuzz Noted. Thank you Got a Smart Ideatell me about it 13:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Get a smart idea. The actual guideline is WP:BLANKING. Please be patient while I take a look at your request. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry about what happened on the page, I thought it was vandalism, I should have looked more closely. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Don’t worry mistakes happens and we are here to fix it Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 14:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome. Happy editing :) Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 14:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Tish Hinojosa
OK, you don't like my edit, then YOU convert the list into prose!!! 50.25.221.206 (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Beck Bennett
Why did you delete my edits, why! --2600:8800:5E00:6A2:E4BB:2601:ABD3:B55D (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Your edits were unsourced, disruptive and seemed like you were never sure of what you were doing. Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 21:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I am frankie rose
and even tho I'm having a tricky time on all music because credits are not there. if you are gonna be a nerd about it fine.
- First of all sign your comments using the four tiles. Secondly, please check WP:V and you will know the reason i reverted your edits. Thank you Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 15:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
CUVA
Hi Synoman Barris, Greeting. You requested to be trained in CUVA on my talk page and removed the message on your second edit - see here. Not sure you removed it by accidentally. Kindly confirm and thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 05:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- CASSIOPEIA, Hello, yes I had requested to be trained at the CUVA, but I waited for sometime and got no response so I requested the same to another trainer. Thanks for asking. Regards Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 08:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Twinkle rollback
Hello. Pretty sure twinkle rollback is a tool designed to counteract unconstructive or disruptive edits, not to decline speedy deletion nominations advanced in good faith. You may want to reconsider how you use it. 69.124.61.163 (talk) 02:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Elon Musk
You asked for me to provide reliable sources but the claim right now that he is an engineer is only backed by source [5] in which he states himself to be an engineer. That is be definition not a reliable source. Please make the changes in order to reflect this. I should not need a reliable source to show that.
COVID biological agent
The European Commission has classified COVID as a biological agent, as has the US. It is quite obviously a biological agent. Explicit sources are not required for any of the other agents in the list either, but here's a source for you.
This is very obvious. Please stop vandalizing the article.
Wikipedia:Sandbox
Thank you for trying to make Wikipedia a better place.
This is really a pretty minor thing, but i'm having trouble figuring out how to say what i'm trying to say. i'm trying to be helpful and encouraging and supportive but what i write keeps sounding belittling in my head, when the truth is i think you did the right thing, i'm just afraid it might not have worked.
In this post, did you use a template to write out the message for you? because the result kind of nonsensically says, "Don't mess up the Sandbox, use the Sandbox instead." i know what you meant, "silt" probably knows what you meant... but...
Truth is truth and rules are rules, but some people need to see or hear them, and some people won't see or hear if they're distracted by... a pretty minor thing.
Does that make sense?
Anyway. Happy Wikipedia-ing. Hope everything goes well.
--96.244.220.178 (talk) 07:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- copy-paste from my Talk page
- Hello, if you read the comments put at the top of the sandbox it says “Please leave this line alone”, but you edited that line, that’s why I reverted it to maintain the structure of the sandbox, Cheers! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thought you said you'd reply here... That wasn't me, that was the user i'm calling "silt". --96.244.220.178 (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- copy paste from above Also take care of the following points... or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. Here on your Talk page, please! :D --96.244.220.178 (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Re: Proposed deletion of Riko Kohara
The article was made literally 5 minutes ago and I was in the process of writing articles and sources.--Yukinotane (talk) 14:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yukinotane, Hello, having a PROD tag doesn’t mean that the article is going to be deleted immediately. Add the reliable sources to it to meet the Notability guidelines.and then remove the PROD tag. I suggest when creating an article use the draft space first before bringing to mainspace ,especially when unsourced,for less chances of deletion. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deletion sorting
Thanks for your recent contributions in performing deletion sorting. Please note that regarding the Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People page, it states, "Note: In most cases there is another, more specific category than this one. If possible, please use one of these instead". I have removed some AfD discussions you listed there because the discussions were listed on at least one of the more specific biographical delsort pages, and were not needed on the People delsort page. Just a heads up so you're aware of this. Thanks, North America1000 13:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, I’ll have a look, thanks for letting me know. I am actually new to deletion sorting. Hope I’ll become more better and precise as I continue. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Sushant Singh Rajput death timing
Heyyy want to you are from? I mean when you edit the Sushant death detail on Wikipedia Karuna Moryani (talk) 05:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Karuna Moryani, I don’t know what you mean? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) There are some folks on Twitter passing around a claim that Rajput's death was added to the article Sushant Singh Rajput before he died and speculating that it was therefore a planned murder rather than suicide. I believe that the UTC timestamps (as opposed to editor-local timestamp) on edits have contributed to their theory. It looks like you were patrolling recent changes that day and did some reverts, so I'm guessing Karuna Moryani is asking what timezone you were in when you reverted the initial suicide edits. Schazjmd (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Schazjmd, Actually this was the first edit about his suicide and I happened to be around and saw that it was unsourced, so I had to revert it. I don’t know what the time was in India? I think the IP made the edit immediately after receiving the news? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Here's a link to one of the conspiracy tweets, if you're interested: https://twitter.com/Official_Arnab_/status/1278005265434963974 Schazjmd (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Schazjmd, WOW, those are just theories, the editor edited some minutes after his death, I think, so he might have had first hand information. Those speculations, about his page being edited before his death, may not be logical Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Here's a link to one of the conspiracy tweets, if you're interested: https://twitter.com/Official_Arnab_/status/1278005265434963974 Schazjmd (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Schazjmd, Actually this was the first edit about his suicide and I happened to be around and saw that it was unsourced, so I had to revert it. I don’t know what the time was in India? I think the IP made the edit immediately after receiving the news? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) There are some folks on Twitter passing around a claim that Rajput's death was added to the article Sushant Singh Rajput before he died and speculating that it was therefore a planned murder rather than suicide. I believe that the UTC timestamps (as opposed to editor-local timestamp) on edits have contributed to their theory. It looks like you were patrolling recent changes that day and did some reverts, so I'm guessing Karuna Moryani is asking what timezone you were in when you reverted the initial suicide edits. Schazjmd (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (May and June 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 16th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
If anyone else would like to contribute to future issues, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Suspicious user
This user joined this platform a month ago and from past 12 days no edits. How come did you know about sushant's death even before the household people? Even before police confirmed? Pratishtha Bhatt (talk) 08:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Pratishtha Bhatt, Which user? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for suggesting Twinkle.
Hello,
You recently suggested I try Twinkle for reverting vandalism and adding warnings, through my user talk page, and I would like to thank you! I've just tried it out and it makes things so, so, so much easier and faster. Again, thank you very much!
Swadge2 (talk) 12:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Swadge2, Anytime. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey
Hey, I am Daniton9999, how are you? --Daniton9999 (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Daniton9999, What exactly is your question? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- My exactly question is, if you want to test an app i made. I know, that is nothing with Wikipedia, but I wanted to ask --Daniton9999 (talk) 12:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 China–India skirmishes on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
WP:UAA reports on users with no edits
Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.
For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Beeblebrox, Sorry for the error. I should be more sight full next time. Cheers
Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 22:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for all of the anti-vandalism work you do! ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you Prahlad! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Re Mass killings by communist states.
Citations can be inserted later - lack of a citation is not a reason for you to remove edits such as the entry pointing out that much mass killing was done by communist states. I will put it in again at a later date, but please do not remove it again. You could be kind enough to put it back in for me. In this case I may find a link at some stage. I do think that the point has to be made at the beginning of the page because currently it reads more like procommunist propaganda than being an honest look at the history which included the deaths of 10s of millions of people done by communist states.
Wikipedia becomes boring when administrators do an immediate removal of a reasonable edit!
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that relies solely on reliable sources, if you add unsourced controversial information it is removed immediately. Please also add your comment at the bottom Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 22:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Pay Phone (Edson Song)
Hi, I have seen you have put the song up for deletion although, I have seen the first edit was not reasonable, I then re edited the page with reliable sources, I think it it purely acceptable.
A point worth mentioning...
...is that YES I support your cause, Black Lives Matter. --92.41.16.175 (talk) 21:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Synoman Barris,
I was quite tentative about making that edit due to the lack of citation. However, I noticed that that entire introductory paragraph was devoid of citations, and thus figured that leaving out a citation wouldn't necessarily go against the flow of the overall text. However, with that said, I understand citations are nonetheless crucial. I referenced Rotten Tomatoes in the text itself, and perhaps should've left a citation to the website in order to verify this (?). Where I did struggle, though, was finding a citation to back up the claim that general audiences, i.e. not professional critics or writers for publications, generally derided Nanette. This is something that is evident from the plethora of comments across a number of different public forums and so on; thus, this is an important piece of information that is nonetheless difficult to cite (as it isn't summarised in a neat article in the same manner that the opinions of the critics were). I added this piece of information as it is crucial - to only relay the professional response to Nanette is to give a homogenous and one-sided perspective on what was otherwise a divisive Netflix release. Furthermore, this is ironic, as the critics themselves praised Nanette for shedding light on stories normally only perceived from one side of the coin.
Thank you for reading - I shall try to come back to this article with some citations.
Afd/Urdudaan
Can you please include in India & Pakistan too. Thanks!--Fztcs 16:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Faizhaider, Done , Thanks Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you--Fztcs 17:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
HungerStation/Nova Company
Hello, I appreciate you for your help and treatment with new users, unlike the other admins, were they used to be aggressive towards us, first of all, i create articles about companies/brands that are popular in their countries, for example, HungerStation the most popular online food delivery in saudi arabia, i used to create article about it with adding source, Now Nova one of the most popular water bottles companies in saudi arabia, i collected all the sources from it’s websites so i can write a brief about them, when someone blames me for advertising these companies, then it’s all wrong. I never used to be a part of conflict of interests, I would be very grateful to you if you helped me get these two pages back, I am a passionate person in Wikipedia and I want to serve my country and show its popular companies/cultures and celebrities to the whole world as much as possible Aziz bm (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Aziz bm, Hello, if you want to write it again, you’ll have to remove promotional words from the article , make it neutral, add reliable sources and it will be just fine.I also suggest you work on the article while in draft space to avoid unnecessary deletion s. Ohh! I am not an administrator though. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Aziz bm, Left some helpful links on your talk page. Happy editing :) Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks 🙏🏻 Aziz bm (talk) 19:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Page mover granted
Hello, Synoman Barris. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 21:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Edit
hello my comment on Oliver Cromwell was removed after I stated Cromwell was a rabbit molester but this is intact true during his time in Ireland amongst other crimes he committed one was the molestation of rabbits most notably the molestation on great Victoria street where he performed this infant of the local Irish Catholics as a sign of disrespect.
Auckland - River Length
Hi,
It seems impossible for the rivers in Auckland to be that long. This should be corrected.
Best,
MKD.
- Then fix it with a correct citation. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
The longest river in the world is about 6000 km. I doubt there are that many rivers is Auckland. Also, I looked at the reference provided in the article. There is nothing there about the length of rivers or streams. There is something about 3700 of coastline in the Auckland region.
Best,
MKD.
your decline
What credible claim of significance exists in this article which you declined as an a7? Praxidicae (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae:The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. He may not meet the General criterion on notability, but he is mentioned as a rapper in some sources I got my eyes on. I think A7 doesn’t apply, I suggest you put it up for AFd then. Period Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mentioned as a rapper is a claim of significance now? What claim of significance is in those sources? Praxidicae (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Praxidicae, I don’t know what you think, but a musician to me is some prove of significance, you can CSD at will and the deleting administrator may decide. Maybe I may be wrong, but I’ll stand bold on my decision to deny the CSD. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Being a musician isn't a claim of significance. At all. Please leave speedy declines to admins or at the very least, more experienced editors so we don't have to waste time on no participation AFDs about utterly non notable people. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Praxidicae, I see you put it up for AFD, so I don’t see where this discussion maybe leading to. I suggest we leave this to the community decide if he is notable or not, which I may agree he does not meet WP:GNG, but once again I still stand bold in my denial of the CSD. Period! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Being a musician isn't a claim of significance. At all. Please leave speedy declines to admins or at the very least, more experienced editors so we don't have to waste time on no participation AFDs about utterly non notable people. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Praxidicae, I don’t know what you think, but a musician to me is some prove of significance, you can CSD at will and the deleting administrator may decide. Maybe I may be wrong, but I’ll stand bold on my decision to deny the CSD. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mentioned as a rapper is a claim of significance now? What claim of significance is in those sources? Praxidicae (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
A request to not delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Katz_(author)
Hi, this page refers to a published author whose books have been published in different editions in English, Japanese, French and Italian. He is the authorised biographer of popular performer Lee 'Scratch' Perry and the producer of several TV and radio documentaries. Citations have been added to the page and the text re-written to be less promotional. The person in question is independently verifiable as noteworthy and the page should not be deleted.1dubwize (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- 1dubwize, Hello, I have had a quick glance of your article, most of the sources there are not reliable sources I.e Amazon, Facebook e.t.c. I never nominated your article for deletion but simply sorted it. You can go to the AFD entry and provide a valid reason why the article should be kept. Thank you Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 22:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Why do you remove my contribution
My writing does not go against the wiki standard Abubakar Zaria (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Abubakar Zaria,Take a look at wp:NPOV Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
This is an educated platform which helps to promoting information but some of us are bias.The work I edited has a lot of errors who I corrected and it was removed.. Abubakar Zaria (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Abubakar Zaria, but if we add biased information, it will no longer become an encyclopedia Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Whatever the case,you have to be lenient and don't consider ur interest. Abubakar Zaria (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Maria Bartiromo
I have noticed negative connotations on anyone one had an association w/ Donald Trump. Peter Navarro is another one. Why does it matter about her interview with Donald Trump? She has interview hundreds of people. Why is her interview w/ Donald Trump the only one mentioned, why is this in her biography? It appears you, Wikipedia are exhibiting "unconscious bias?" 2601:841:4100:DBE0:F8:FD2A:38FB:9CDF (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Have a look at your talk page Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi
You said you reverted my edits on masterchefgreece but I never even visited the page.