User talk:Syed Shial

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i waited for more than six months with zero edits and i agreed that i will not disrupt and violate any of the policies of wikipedia. My edit would be a reliable, meets with wikipedia guidelines,etc. I will stop editing from multiple accounts (prevent myself from sockpuppetry or checkuser and other blocks). Thankyou!. Syed Shial (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Could you explain what was wrong with your page moves? Also, what edits do you want to make, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was moving pages bcz of changing their "titles" continuously, i apologizes for that because at that time i didn't read WP:PAGEMOVE. I am a resident of Jammu and Kashmir, so for me it would be easy to edit the pages like religious places, tourist places, villages, institutions,etc. Thankyou! Syed Shial (talk) 12:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been recent WP:LOUT socking found using the CheckUser tool and admitted to on IRC. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Syed Shial, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Syed Ali Alaa-ud-Din Bulhari (R.a), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! POLITANVM ^talk 03:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Syed, I’ve moved your article to Draft:Chewdara-A because it isn’t yet ready to be a published article. Please read through Help:Your first article to learn more about creating articles for Wikipedia. The main issue with this article was that you provided no sources, so the information could not be verified and it’s unclear if the subject is notable. POLITANVM ^talk 14:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:SYED ALI ALAA-UD-DIN BUKHARI (R. A).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SYED ALI ALAA-UD-DIN BUKHARI (R. A).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hii!

It's not my own work so you can delete it. Syed Shial (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hello, Syed Shial,

Why are you moving pages all around? It's disruptive and it results in a lot of error pages that admins must clean up and delete.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia and policies, please visit the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiw can i delete it? Syed Shial (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admins will take care of deleting mistakenly moved pages. But please stop moving pages.

The draft article is now at Draft:Syed Ali Alaa-ud-Din Bukhari. You may continue to work on it at that link. Again, please do not move it.

If you don't plan to work on this article anymore, let us know, and we can have it deleted. Otherwise, it will automatically be deleted after 6 months with no edits.

If you'd like a guide to getting started editing Wikipedia, please visit Help:Introduction. POLITANVM ^talk 17:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syed Shial. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TheresNoTime ^😺 14:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chewdara-A

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Chewdara-A requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Techie3 (talk) 04:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is my original main account,please unblock this and i will not use multiple accounts, as per the rules of wikipedia. Thankyou! Syed Shial (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion yesterday. There's no meaningful chance of an unblock while you continue to violate WP:EVADE and/or WP:SOCK. Your best bet now is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 13:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock my acc. @Syed Shial12 Syed Shial (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You literally requested an unblock on one of your sock accounts at the same time and claimed it was not you. You need to go six months without any sort of editing before an unblock will be considered. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To follow up

on your IRC post, you will also need to agree to stop creating pages about Syed Shial, by whatever name you change the title to . You will need to describe what constructive edits you would make. As to the forgotten password, Help:Reset password might be what you need. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am requesting again and concluding that i will notice all the wikipedia guidelines during creating the pages,etc. Syed Shial (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

i will notice all the wikipedia guidelines during creating the pages,etc just doesn't cut it (indeed, "notice" doesn't even indicate you'll follow them). To demonstrate you understand those policies properly, in your own words explain why your moving was problematic and what you would do differently if unblocked. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser evidence shows no recent block evasion. I'll note, though, that this unblock request doesn't come close to answering the points raised by Deepfriedokra. WP:CIR may apply here. --Yamla (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This time, i am honestly saying that I know i made a lot of mistakes in the past, but from now i will not repeat the same mistakes again, neither i will create pages about Syed Shial nor will edit the wikipedia from the multiple accounts. If you will unblock me, my edits would be according to the wikipedia's policy. Thankyou !Syed Shial (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below; will revoke TPA. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Syed Shial (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, no recent evidence of block evasion. Once again, no meaningful attempt to address the points raised by Deepfriedokra. To the next reviewing admin, if Syed Shial is unwilling to address these points and given many previous attempts to mislead us, it may be time to revoke talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 19:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

concur -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]