User talk:SydneyFocht

Testing talk! MSederberg21 (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC) I see your schwartz is as big as mine, but let's see how you handle it. Icecreamcooper (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC) It is just a quote from the movie spaceballs, thats all.Icecreamcooper (talk) 05:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Please leave me comments with your signature, Thank you SydneyFocht (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Mason

Your edit to Charlotte Mason has been reverted by another editor, because the article is not a place for commentary. If you have suggestions for improvements to the article, these can be made at Talk:Charlotte Mason. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback (Psyc 212)

The only article that would work for the class is the spooning article. If you'd like to run a few other options by me, that's fine. Avoid any book and movie review articles. Mpetracca (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at the article and talk page, I think you have a couple of options. 1. Do more background research on spooning, possibly including the tests for it, etc. 2. Change to the Chorea article. It could still use expansion and it looks like this was partly what you were looking into anyway. Look for some recent review articles, etc. If you choose to switch articles, just make sure you put the class banner on the new one and change the link on your user page etc. Still respond to the posts on the spooning talk page, even if you are switching over. Let me know if you have any questions. Mpetracca (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you were able to get everything onto the article page. You made some significant improvements to the content of the article, but it still needs a good polishing in terms of grammar. There is also one of the references that could use expanding (include the full reference info) and you didn't include an image. Overall though, I think with some last minute polishing this could be a really good addition to the article. Mpetracca (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References for Article of Interest

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:SydneyFocht/sandbox (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:SydneyFocht/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Types of Chorea

Hello SydneyFocht,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Types of Chorea for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ~Helicopter Llama~ 18:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not an article

I see that you moved User:SydneyFocht to SydneyFocht, but it is obviously not an article. Rather than nominating it for deletion I have moved it to a user subpage at User:SydneyFocht/Chorea. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:23, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I now see that a large chunk of that page is again a copyright violation from http://www.patient.co.uk/doctor/sydenhams-chorea, so I have tagged the page for speedy deletion. You have been warned previously about copyright violation, and if you continue with that illegal activity you are likely to find yourself blocked from editing Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For your information

Hi. I've commented on your comment/review at the talk page for retinohypothalamic tract. --Hordaland (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]