This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

I'm currently busy with family matters IRL so I will on and off of Wikipedia for a while.

Sxkc, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sxkc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sxkc! You created a thread called Regarding MOS:LEAD at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deji (YouTuber) (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Deji (YouTuber) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is now an article on the subject, Deji (YouTuber), but it has been nominated for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be merged into the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future use or deleted, as determined by the closer. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji (YouTuber).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deji (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deji (YouTuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Deji (YouTuber)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Deji (YouTuber) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DeltaQuad: My draft was made way before the article Deji (YouTuber) was created so its impossible for my draft to be a repost of that article, you can literally check the dates. I have nothing to do with the article Deji (YouTuber), I didn't even make a single edit on it, I knew that article was going to be deleted. Also, while the subject was the same, most of the info in my draft was different to that of the article. Yes, I'm obviously not going to remake that draft, I made it a long time ago, I'm just addressing the fact that it wasn't a repost of the article Deji (YouTuber) because my draft was made way before the article.—Sxkc (talk) 15:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough on the timing aspect, but then it still would have qualified for something like G6 cause it wouldn't be able to make to mainspace. This notice is just a normal template that is put on talkpages. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dissimulation (KSI album)

Hello Sxkc, I don't think you are understanding my points. The Billboard 200 comprises the US Album Sales Chart, meaning there's no need for a mention of the US Album Sales Chart. This is mentioned frequently in Wikipedia rules/guidelines. Also, it's ok to include the UK Independent Chart because this doesn't "make up" the UK Album Chart - the UK Independent Chart is a sub-genre of the UK Album Chart, just like the UK R&B Album Chart. I don't want to have to keep reverting your changes and resulting in an edit war. You need to just accept that there is no need for a mention of those two US Sales Charts. The three articles you gave in defence of your argument don't even defend your argument. The first article doesn't even include the chart, and the other two articles CAN include those charts because the album DID NOT chart on the Billboard 200. KSI DID chart on the Billboard 200, meaning there is NO NEED for US Album Sales Charts when the main, primary US Chart is already cited. I hope that you can understand where you have misunderstood. Also, when you revert my recent edit, you're also reverting other constructive edits made to the article. If your going to revert someone's edit, at least revert the necessary part, not the whole edit. Your behaviour completely goes against Wikipedia rules. I don't this situation to result in you getting in trouble. Timwikisidemen 21:09, 3 June 2020 (BST)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Zaydx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]