User talk:Swiss3312
Speedy deletion declined: Blue World (Super Junior song)
[edit]Hello Swiss3312. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Blue World (Super Junior song), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to records. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Samskruthy Shenoy
[edit]Speedy deletion declined: Samskruthy Shenoy
[edit]Hello Swiss3312, i just added tow reference to that page. Can u decline that deletion now... Thanks you --Neodare (talk) 09:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)User:Neodare
Black Sabbath Madman Live Athens
[edit]Hello Swiss3312. Thank you for the information about your notification for Athens Live.But how it used to be a promotional and not an encyclopedia article if it was an official release? It is a professional recording from the inside cameras. It was releases like documentary from this company and I've got this dvd. Also, I have found it in many stores and yet, you can order it. if you like to take a look, you can check it on this pages and on you tube.
http://eil.com/products/Black+Sabbath/Madman+Alive+In+Athens/Black+Sabbath+Madman+Alive+In+Athens+460066.html http://www.jcrmusicnews.com/fr/catalogues/details/8381/dvd-import-zone-2/black-sabbath-madman-alive-in-athens-live-2005-dvd-import-zone-2 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=22690
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADP8X-FM15c
If you are wright, then delete my article. But if you are wrong, please remove the deletion tag.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForceOfEvil (talk • contribs) 18:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Neutrality Dispute Fair Admissions Campaign
[edit]Hi Swiss3312. I saw you flagged the neutrality of the Fair Admissions Campaign page, I was wondering what suggestions you had or which parts of the article you disputed ? DTNewman (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC) Hi, in my opinion, the article seems to be a little bias towards the unequal law. Probably at wiki, it would be more appropriate that we give both sides of the picture. Have a good day.
Welcome
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion declined: Antonio Cabral de Melo
[edit]Hello Swiss3312, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Antonio Cabral de Melo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Declined speedy deletion
[edit]I have declined your speedy deletion request on Cyber Storm III. If you check WP:CSD#A7, you'll see that it only applies to people, animals, and organizations; the article in question is about an event. I see you've had other problems raised above about other speedy nominations you've made; you should probably review the criteria, as it's very important that we don't bite new editors by unfairly tagging their pages for speedy deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Nazanin Aghakhani
[edit]Hi Swiss3312, please explain why you so speedily deleted my article without even commenting on my explanation. Also, I wonder how anyone who has joined Wikipedia like two weeks ago is so keen on deleting other newbies' efforts? –Kotivalo (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Amanda Cerny
[edit]I understand that you want to get an article posted for Amanda Cerny. There is already a start to one posted at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amanda Cerny. It's probably in everyone's best interest to get the article written and approved there before putting it up live in the main article space. The article that keeps being posted in the main article space is lacking in reliable sources. They are mainly self-published sources or IMDB which are not the best. So, please, get the article worked out at AFC first and get it approved there. Dismas|(talk) 01:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Chaklalajob (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Machel Waikenda
[edit]A tag has been placed on Machel Waikenda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Machel Waikenda for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Machel Waikenda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machel Waikenda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)