User talk:Sweetkiss1234

Welcome!

Hello, Sweetkiss1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ruby Orenthal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! STATic message me! 19:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruby Orenthal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ruby Orenthal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 19:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruby Orenthal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ruby Orenthal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nymf _{talk to me} 07:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Emma Watson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nymf _{talk to me} 19:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bella Thorne, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Billi Bruno may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Billi is bestfriends with [[According to Jim]] co-star [[Taylor Atelian]] since 2001 [[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_2gsjekc2g]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jockzain. I noticed that you made changes to number of articles and added Partners to the Biographies of living person which is too strong term and inappropriate for people who are or were dating and also you didn't provide a reliable source for your edits instead added gossip sites such as Perez Hilton and IMDB bio section which is not reliable at all. It's been removed for now, If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jockzain (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conner Rayburn (According to Jim)

The article Conner Rayburn (According to Jim) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 16:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protection templates

Please stop changing protection templates in articles. You have no reason to do so, and you don't know what you're doing. It's disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

You're not using good judgment with regard to choosing infobox photos (in my opinion) and I'm not the only one who has been reverting your changes. May I make a suggestion that you first propose your changes on talk pages before making the changes? Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Waterloo Road characters Page Protection

Hi Sweetkiss1234,
Please refrain from changing Page Protection expiry dates!,
It's been set to indefinite for a reason!,
Thanks :) →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Candice Accola, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jacqueline Jossa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Television article infobox images

Please note that by convention, we use the intertitle image in television infoboxes, not cast images, as I indicated in this edit to According to Jim a week ago. We do not include multiple occurences of non-free images, as was the case after this edit. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations block

I have temporarily blocked you from editing. In addition to other concerns brought up above, you have now begun introducing multiple copyright violations into the encyclopedia, claiming images to be your "own work". [1] [2] and so on. Your can appeal this block by adding the following below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. We would need some kind of assurance that you are taking the concerns seriously that have been brought up about your editing, and that you will not further put Wikipedia at risk. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 13:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that this user is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nika1234, so you could probably go ahead and block it indefinitely as a sock. I don't have the energy to file a proper report myself. Nymf _{talk to me} 13:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]