User talk:SweetDreamz

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Phil Judd. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 07:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Judd

This material appears to have been published in a reliable source and, if deemed to be relevant to the subject of the article, is worthy of inclusion here. There are many examples here of rock/pop musicians (such as Gary Glitter) being well-known for their music, but also for other issues. That does not mean that Wikipedia should concentrate on either of those issues. Meanwhile, the laws of libel generally do not favour censorship over truth. Threatening any legal action whatsoever for merely repeating what is reported in reliable sources is unconstructive, and will lead to blocking unless and until such legal threat is withdrawn. Hope that helps. Rodhull andemu 00:18, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you stated that Phil Judd himself has edited the article about him (it's not his article). Please would you point Mr Judd towards this policy on such editing. The core policy here is WP:BLP, which means that we do not omit material which presents a person in a bad light, but that it must be demonstrated to be verifiable by reliable sources. Reports of criminal convictions in newspapers meet this. Mjroots (talk) 05:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Phil Judd, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No legal threats

Your recent edits to User talk:Biker Biker could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Judd

SweetDreamz,

No problem! (Btw - you might want to link your name to your page, it's a requirement per the signature guidelines. Thanks! KoshVorlonNaluboutes,Aeria Gloris 19:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]