User talk:Svenja Taubert

This is Svenja Taubert's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Svenja Taubert! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BodyFast has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BodyFast. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Svenja Taubert. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:BodyFast, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Svenja Taubert. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Svenja Taubert|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BodyFast (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fancy Refrigerator were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BodyFast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 14:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Svenja Taubert! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 14:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:BodyFast, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Svenja Taubert, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Svenja Taubert|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 14:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as suggested I posted the disclosure on my user page. Was this correct? Let me know in case you need me to take any further actions. Svenja Taubert (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the disclosure. And yes, that was the correct template, correctly filled-in; I just removed the 'nowiki' wrappers which were preventing it from operating correctly. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, thx :) Svenja Taubert (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]