User talk:Superjurek

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.115.54.86 (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Superjurek! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am happy to be the first person to welcome you to English Wikipedia! I have prepared this welcome message to help you with your continued adventure here, check them out or visit the new contributors' help page! Happy Editing! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus\| reply here} 19:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started: Tutorials and Training

Click on "show" to the right to expand

We have some interactive tutorials and trainings you may want to try:

And some regular articles you can just read:

Getting Help: How and Where to Ask a Question?

Click on "show" to the right to expand

There are numerous ways you can ask for help.

You can ask me on my talk page.
You can copy and place {{helpme}} with your accompanying question on the bottom of your talk page and someone else will show up shortly to answer your questions here.
You can try one of the specialized fora listed at the "Where to ask a question" page.
If you prefer live chat, try #wikipedia-en-help IRC chat room. Click here to get connected through your browser!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date

On a final note, you may want to try the new (beta) VisualEditor, check out our weekly newspaper, the Wikipedia Signpost, and join a WikiProject of interest to you. WikiProjects gather editors interested in certain topic areas, providing them with information, tools and a place to discuss the topic in question. Based on your recent edits I think you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland. For a list of all WikiProjects, see here. Joining a WikiProject makes the Wikipedia experience much richer! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Cub Scout and Brownie Law for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Cub Scout and Brownie Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cub Scout and Brownie Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 00:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Polish ranks

The problem is, for the English Wikipedia, separate articles are not notable. There is a single article on Ranks in the Boy Scouts of America, Ranks in Gerakan Pramuka Indonesia, and Ranks in the Scout Association of Japan. Those are three of the most important Scout associations, and yet they each have but the one article. Please don't branch like that, they will be merged per en:WP:MOS.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Superjurek! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ranks in Polish Scouting/Guide or leader

The article Ranks in Polish Scouting/Guide or leader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ranks in Polish Scouting/Organizer

The article Ranks in Polish Scouting/Organizer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Encyklopedycznosc na en wiki

Po pierwsze, na en wiki sa o wiele ostrzejrze kryteria encyklopedycznsci. Bez zrodel, art. nie przejdzie, a i zrodla musza byc dobre (na pl wiki jest to rzadko przestrzegane). A do rank w harcerstwie brakuje zrodel. Popatrzylem i nie widze, by inne kraje byly inaczej traktowane; rangi sa opisane zbiorczo w art. takich jak Membership levels of the Girl Scouts of the USA czy Ranks in the Boy Scouts of America. Jest takze art o Scout Leader, gdzie mozna dodac/skopiowac polska sekcje. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jadwiga Bryła

Hello, Superjurek. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jadwiga Bryła, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jadwiga Bryła to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earlobe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hannah Marshall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Earlobe fetishism

The article Earlobe fetishism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Earlobes are an erogenous zone, but I find no sources describing interest in them as a paraphilia/fetish. See also this longer previous version, the article mainly contained how-to material. At best this could be a redirect to Erogenous zone#Ears.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw

The article Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw

I will reply on the article's talk page (in English so others can participate, not just Polish speakers). Also feel free to remove the prod template so that the article is not deleted while we are discussing. It can always go to AfD later. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrycja Grzebyk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patrycja Grzebyk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recipients of the Cross of Valour

A tag has been placed on Category:Recipients of the Cross of Valour indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cross of Valour

A tag has been placed on Category:Cross of Valour indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw (March 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw. Nothing seems to have changed since September 2020.

This draft appears to have been copied (and translated) from a university catalog.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Superjurek! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Wiwi127/Patrycja Grzebyk

Hello, Superjurek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrycja Grzebyk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 10:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cancel

Template:Cancel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw

Hello, Superjurek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw

Hello, Superjurek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faculty of Political Science and International Studies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ORCID-human

Template:ORCID-human has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Skarzyńska (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cowboygilbert was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources in certain places - I will add {{cn}} tags where citations are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alina Skarzyńska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 19:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]