Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused template. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no need for a template to use a file, when any articles can just use the file File:Seme coppe carte napoletane.svg to display this. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 4. ✗plicit 23:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused template. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Arlington Renegades staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Houston Roughnecks staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:DC Defenders staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Orlando Guardians staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:St. Louis BattleHawks staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
All are no longer used. Each one of these staff templates has been substituted within each of these five teams' articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused and not needed as the LA Wildcats article has the same listing as the final roster within the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused, two links, and no mainspace article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Team 9 roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Team 9 no longer exists in the XFL post-2020. Hasn't been used for awhile and unlikely to be. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as template creator. No longer needed, as Team 9 will not be used in the XFL moving forward. Eagles 24/7 (C) 11:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:ORCID-human (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused link template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also delete Module:ORCID-human for the same reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. This navbox has no main article and no links in the body except to tangentially related articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This stub is now in use. Trigenibinion (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This completes a set of templates, it is not standalone. Trigenibinion (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The no-transclusions issue has been fixed. However, while the template links to 6 other articles, there's a bunch of redlinks to fill in. Any comments on those?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Still qualifies for deletion. Tfd is not used to bring attention to create articles. It's up to the creator to have created the articles before the navbox. Same is true for the other set that he created that I nominated on the 23rd. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Different people do different things on Wikipedia. I created the navbox which has data not shown elsewhere. Other people can create the articles guided by it. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's not how navboxes work. The articles have to exist before a navbox is created. When we refer to links we actually mean the articles. By not enough links, they're aren't enough existing articles for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, that is bottom-up. This is top-down. The best method is bidirectional. Trigenibinion (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's not how navboxes work. The articles have to exist before a navbox is created. When we refer to links we actually mean the articles. By not enough links, they're aren't enough existing articles for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links/too loosely affiliated to warrant a navbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It has enough links. What happens is that there are many missing articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trigenibinion Minor point: This template is not a "stub." Her Pegship (?) 14:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is still classified as a stub template because the Peruvian auto parts industry was not investigated. Trigenibinion (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia:Stub. Her Pegship (?) 22:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- There are stub categories for templates. Trigenibinion (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia:Stub. Her Pegship (?) 22:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is still classified as a stub template because the Peruvian auto parts industry was not investigated. Trigenibinion (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Trigenibinion Minor point: This template is not a "stub." Her Pegship (?) 14:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- It has enough links. What happens is that there are many missing articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete only 1 blue link. If the red linked articles are actually notable, create those articles first, and then and only then should this template be re-created. The purpose of a template is to link between articles on the same topic- this template does not currently do that. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- The categories designated as "Foo stub templates" contain stub templates, i.e. templates to be used to tag stub articles. That doesn't include any other kind of template. Her Pegship (?) 22:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Joseph2302 (talk). Her Pegship (?) 22:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No longer needed since it's been blanked almost a month ago according to the edit, "No current squad, S.S. Teramo calcio is excluded from football. There is a phoenix club in Promozione." WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing at S.S. Teramo Calcio says the club has been excluded, but without a 'current' squad there is no need for the squad navbox. GiantSnowman 15:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 4. ✗plicit 03:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete duplicate of table at Shooting at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Qualification, which is only place this table is needed. So template is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Seventh-day Adventist camps of North America map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:St Clarets GAA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No longer used. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused and outdated. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - not needed, insufficient blue links to merit keeping it if it was updated to reflect C.D.S. Tampico Madero#First-team squad. GiantSnowman 15:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Only two links. Not enough for a navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused and very likely an update will have enough links per NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused map of Japanese football teams. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 15:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete don't need a template for this. We have a file of the Administrative divisions of Latvia: File:Latvijas novadi 2021.png (from 2021, when it looks like they changed). Don't need a duplicating template for this too. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).