User talk:Superiormarket

April 2013

Hello, I'm AnemoneProjectors. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mehmet Osman because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! –anemone projectors– 11:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jacqueline Jossa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jacqueline Jossa. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 19:55, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at User_talk:Theroadislong shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. FunPika 19:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Top ten tennis players, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 ^Talk 20:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]