User talk:Superfriend223

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTAFORUM

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia once again. Please note that Wikipedia is not a forum. I encourage you to read through the policies of Wikpedia (starting from the "Five pillars" article above), and adhere to them while raising issues on talk pages. In particular, any claims you make must be supported by reliable sources, and you should not contest claims made in reliable sources using your own original research. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have valid criticisms to make about published sources, you need to publish them in journals or news magazines. Wikipedia is not the place for such criticisms. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That makes absolutely no sense. You can cite anything on Wikipedia, so when new information from credible sources comes in, you don't change information? It seems like your policies just exist to hide your racist contributors and racist policies to shout out all those who provide credible challenges. I see you've done nothing about Joshua Jonathon who uses OLDER articles with no scientific data to "discredit" newer scientific papers on the Indo-Aryan migration talk page. You're just a bunch of racists, that's why his hateful views go unchallenged and don't get any shred of scrutiny. your bigoted racists. Superfriend223 (talk) 04:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTHERE. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Doug Weller talk 09:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 09:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked for 72 hours from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Personal attacks are contrary to policy, and this is a collaborative project. Calling your fellow editors "racists" without extremely persuasive evidence is simply not allowed here. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Vision quest has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Insulting other people's religious beliefs in edit summaries is not an acceptable practice. Greyjoy^talk 07:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Aggressive Islamophobia is not permitted. Go blog elsewhere. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]