User talk:SuperSuperSonic208

Welcome, SuperSuperSonic208!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SuperSuperSonic208! I'm CFA, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! C F A 💬 02:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undone two edits

Hi there! I have undone two of your edits ~ to Future (rapper) and Nas ~ because the language read better previously. Saying something is "better known" is not helpful in an encyclopaedia ~ better known by whom, how do we measure it, what proof is there that it is so? ~ whereas using "professionally known" or some variation thereof makes no judgement and simply states the fact that the person uses an alias for professional reasons. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 05:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, but there's no rule or guideline saying to not use "better known". How is it a poor phrase. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a poor phrase because it is unclear, as i say: Better known than what? How do we know it's better known? How are you measuring it? You are making a value judgement in Wikipedia's voice, which we don't do, by saying "better known". If we say "professionally known", the phrase is at least as clear and is not making a value judgement, it simply saying that the artist uses an alias. which we proceed to give. in his or her profession. Hope this makes it clearer for you. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 17:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I can only say is that there only better known for the stage name. That's all. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SuperSuperSonic207 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuperSuperSonic207. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Ingenuity (t • c) 02:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do? I literally did nothing wrong. Your lucky I wasn't trying to edit war. All I did was go on any articles talk page. That's all. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now i cannot edit anymore. Like i said, your lucky that im no longer edit warring. Now why are you blocking me for no reason? SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me

Please unblock me from Wikipedia. I didn't do anything wrong or bad. Sometimes, I Fixed Grammer or revert back to what they were that doesn't need to be said twice. Also, all I did was go on the articles talk page a lot rather than edit warring. That's all. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make an unblock request, put the unblock template ({{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}) at the bottom of your talk page. If you're going to do this, make sure to address both reasons you were blocked: on your old account and for sockpuppetry on this one. C F A 💬 03:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but how will it work? SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An administrator will review your request. They will decide if you can be unblocked. C F A 💬 03:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. How do i find the template page in order to get unblocked? SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperSuperSonic208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I literally did nothing wrong. Your lucky I wasn't trying to edit war. All I did was go on any articles talk page. That's all. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are a sock of User talk:SuperSuperSonic207. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

I don't think this is going to work. You have to actually try to address the issues you were blocked for. You can't just say you did nothing wrong and expect to get away with it. C F A 💬 17:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i litterly don't like to get block on Wikipedia. I wanna continue editing. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're just going to get your talk page access revoked if you keep posting comments like this. I suggest taking a break before considering another unblock request. C F A 💬 02:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't usually get unblocked just because you don't like being blocked. On your first account, you were extremely combative and showed no regard for collaboratively building an encyclopedia. You were of course blocked for this. Then, you immediately set up a new account with a nearly identical username and just jump straight back into all the old fights you were having before. You learnt nothing from your first block at all, and show zero understanding even after being blocked for a second time, now acting like you're just entitled to edit because you don't like being blocked. Absolutely no way should you be unblocked, in my opinion. GraziePrego (talk) 02:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but you should know that i no longer edit war. Your lucky I didn't even edit war, and rather just go to any of the articles talk page like what many Wiki users would do. That's all. As a result, you shouldn't assumed to can't get unblocked any time soon, especially since I did nothing else wrong, GraziePrego. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being a sockpuppet of a banned account is doing something wrong. Also, why would I be lucky that you didn't edit war? Shouldn't have to be lucky for a user not to edit disruptively. GraziePrego (talk) 03:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just relax. You're not going to get anywhere by repeatedly claiming you've done nothing wrong. You clearly have; you were blocked twice for it. C F A 💬 03:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and because of you and that stupid "known professionally as" term being better, you sometimes don't make any sense by acting like the term "better known by his/her/the stage name" is not allowed on Wikipedia, when there's literally no rule or guideline saying only use "known professionally as". Your the one other reason i got blocked over this. SuperSuperSonic208 (talk) 03:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had plenty of content disagreements with editors, and they all got resolved with no one getting blocked. Why? Because they didn't edit war over them. That's the reason you were blocked, not because we disagreed over wording. GraziePrego (talk) 03:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]