User talk:SuperDraun

Welcome!

Hello, SuperDraun, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! SuperDraun, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur) (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References are mentions or about the company. I do not see the significant coverage required to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TotalTruthTeller24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per your restoring my Victor Stone (DC Extended Universe) merge: All my edits are good NRP. You have known that for years now, I know you must know, more than "somewhat reasonable": nothing but reasonable. Can we talk frankly, finally, just us? Because while I have a lot of respect for what you do in general, I do believe it is wasting both our time to be going back-and-forth like this over the years, since if we continue along this road I am just going to continue making normal, helpful edits, and you will keep reverting them because once upon a time (must be seven+ years ago now) a twelve-year-old was called out for having separate accounts for school and home, and someone she didn't even know attempted to stop her from doing the only normal thing she did in her free time. Plus I know you are much older than me: I saw you mention the 1990s once. SuperDraun (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also on top of that: Skybosh? Bromizir? I do not know who those people are. About a solid third of the people you block as me are not me but I still receive emails over you blocking them. Whatever metric you are using, there is an error there. SuperDraun (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashvin Borad (July 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CFA was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No evidence of notability at all.

C F A 💬 19:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]