User talk:SunnyDSunnyD
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
UEFA Cup 2008-09 goal scoring leaders table
[edit]You said "UEFA does not include these goals in their count, and Wikipedia should not contradict what the organizers consider official. FWIW, here is a link to last year's CL stats on the UEFA website in which they include group stage and knockout round goals only. (Sorry, don't see any stats for UC.)" To be quite honest, you're wrong about you're theory here. The Overall table option takes into account all goals scored throughout the competition. It takes into account all goals scored and the table would be sortable where a reader can sort the table according to which of the three columns he/she wants. Kingjeff (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you have a link to something official showing that UEFA includes qualifying round goals in their statistics? I haven't run across anything like that on the their website. I don't believe what I stated is a "theory", but I will stand corrected if there are official sources to the contrary. Thanks. SunnyDSunnyD (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Further, I see the another link from UEFA that has recently been referenced on the article's talk page discussion. [1] This seems pretty clear about the fact that only goals from the first round on are considered. Again, I'd be interested in documentation (as opposed to rhetoric) supporting your opinion that this is inaccurate. SunnyDSunnyD (talk) 03:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
| Player | Team | QR | FT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player A | Team A | 5 | 14 | 19 |
| Player B | Player B | 1 | 15 | 16 |
| Player C | Team A | 3 | 17 | 20 |
| Player D | Team C | - | 10 | 10 |
Here is an example of what I have in mind for an overall table. As you can see, it's just an expansion to what usual table. Kingjeff (talk) 03:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I understand your proposal and would support it if UEFA considered qualifying goals official in the count, or if they present it both ways. But they don't seem to, unless you have found otherwise. SunnyDSunnyD (talk) 07:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Why does UEFA have to support this? The table clearly supports both options. Kingjeff (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Because they are the competition organizer and therefore a reasonable arbiter of which goals are considered official for purposes of tracking who has the most. You're welcome to your opinion to the contrary, but you were the one who called for a vote. SunnyDSunnyD (talk) 20:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
But you realize you're wrong? Kingjeff (talk) 00:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, no, you've still yet to support your position with an argument other than "you're wrong", so I assume you have none. This is my final reply on this thread. SunnyDSunnyD (talk) 01:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inter Miami CF II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyler Hall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inter Miami CF II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyler Hall.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nykolas Sessock (April 15)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nykolas Sessock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, SunnyDSunnyD!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Inter Miami CF records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Taylor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nykolas Sessock (August 6)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nykolas Sessock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)